Should middle schools be teaching lesbian kissing??

News report from; Red Hook N.Y.

Parents of children attending a Red Hook, N.Y., middle school are outraged after a recent anti-bullying presentation at Linden Avenue Middle School.

The workshop for 13- and 14-year-old girls focused on homosexuality and gender identity. They were also taught words such as “pansexual” and “genderqueer.”

Parents say their daughters were told to ask one another for a kiss, and they say two girls were told to stand in front of the class and pretend they were lesbians on a date.

Middle School Girls Told to Ask for Lesbian Kiss During Class http://www.charismanews.com/culture/39237-middle-school-girls-told-to-ask-for-lesbian-kiss-during-class via @sharethis

Why was this only reportedly for 13-and 14-year-old girls, why not the boys as well? Not that we support such behaviors in a public school system as part of a well-rounded education. If this is the kind of thing to support within our school systems, shouldn’t we also be supportive of gay students acting as if they were straight, telling them in a class room setting to kiss the opposite sex? Would that be over the top, or cruel? Is this what passes for a good education? What does this kind of instruction really do for these young minds?

Can someone be taught a sexual orientation, or is it just a complex interplay of genetic factors? If we were to except that there is a genetic factor to what defines a person’s sexual orientation; then this kind of class room education, as was done in the Red Hook N.Y middle school would be cruel, unusual, insulting, demeaning, to those school age girls that wouldn’t be genetically predisposed to such orientation. If there could be a factor that sexual orientation is learned, instead of being genetic, then what was this school thinking with the exercise? Is it a schools responsibility to produce more of a certain type of people sexually, or just to provide a well-rounded education to all types of people regardless of sexual orientation?

Even in that bastion of liberalism “California” They have “Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight”. Why any schools would then try to turn “Straight People Gay”, with lessens that resemble sexual experimentation on young impressionable minds?

California to Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/05/08/california-to-ban-therapies-that-try-to-turn-gay-people-straight/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=Share%20Buttons

It simply is amazing that these days young girls can without parental guidance; get free birth control, and abortions services. But can’t bring aspirin to school, can’t sign a contract to buy a car or rent an apartment…and so on. They can’t get married without parental permission, but society supports if a mistake is made, welfare services for expectant mothers whether they are living at home or not. Schools are becoming a place where parents are forced to send their kids, to receive an orientation that undermines the family structure, religious value systems or even morals. A far cry from what was intended to be a public education, an education that would consist of reading, writing, arithmetic, and sciences…ect. To now day’s what has become, “Sexual Social Design”, through a social engineering within the liberal-mind set. Freedom of choice, individual or otherwise isn’t an option with liberal policies. Unless people start to defend their rights and demand a change, this will become the standards in the future, or worse!

Advertisements

An Obstructionist view to the good, the bad, and the ugly, and modern slaves.

From Examiner

On Wednesday 12/13/2012, singer Harry Belafonte offered some friendly advice for Barack Obama while speaking with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. In his view, the president should rule like a third world dictator and throw the GOP in jail for opposing him.

“That there should be this lingering infestation of really corrupt people who sit trying to dismantle the wishes of the people, the mandate that has been given to Barack Obama, and I don’t know what more they want. The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a third world dictator and just put all these guys in jail,” he said.

Mr. Belafonte must have never hear of limited and separation of powers and a limited government? A representation by the people who voted for their representatives in government. The left loves to say. “Elections have consequences.” Until they have to live with the consequences of any elections they disagree with.

I suppose the left has forgotten that in 2010 the people voted overwhelmingly to control spending, by limiting government, as why the GOP Tea party won overwhelmingly in the house of representatives. Now these same people are called “obstructionists” by the liberal left. Liberals are forgetting facts of truth totally, offering complaints to them, by saying that elections have consequences, but refusing to see the election results in terms of people speaking to their political leaders, over that as being only a win or a loss in any election.

In America we don’t elect a dictatorship ( a winner take all, completely unopposed power, a situation in having to accept only the winners policies). We elect officials who hopefully have the ability’s to perswade people to see their points of view, and then voting on those points. Not to drag people, kicking and screaming, in excepting or invoke political policies of crisis, or manipulating people in selecting only from these solutions of more spending and borrowing. What is said to be those same failed solutions of uncontrolled government, that only seems to lead to an even more manipulative or uncomfortable life, within an identical crisis to the past.

“Nothing is accomplished in facing tomorrows responsibility’s, by refusing to act on todays responsibility’s.” unknown.

Doing the same things over and over expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

To call your political opponents obstructionist because you dislike their politics, or at the very least, want them to compromise their principles, is just using a dictator’s vision,” In order to get along, you must go along.”

One man’s obstructionist is another man’s conservationist. Who would be working to protect against socialist dictators using command and control style governing as the only option. The left seem to be using crisis, or the creations of them, to increase the need for government to take power and liberty from the people, thus killing the future needs to vote on issues. After all if you don’t support winners policies then you are an obstructionists to them, all because elections have consequences you know?

Using the terms of……. “Elections have consequences.” never seem to sink into the liberal mind, when they have to deal with a loss of an election. Funny that the left then also starts to use terms like “obstructionist” in describing someone who is doing their job, according to the people that voted these politicians into office. Liberals tend to overlook that there is more to an election year then who won the presidents office.

When that doesn’t work they seem to use stronger terms like Mr. Belafonte used, “Infestation”! So when Republicans or Tea-party people were elected to office, charged with doing the job as the people’s representatives, in stopping Obama’s reckless policies, they can now be considered to be an “infestation” in government. The descriptive nature of these words and others, describing your political rivals as being the problem, while hiding the true nature of the problem, is governing through fear. Because words have meanings the word choice is interesting, since one normally deals with an infestation by eliminating it. Can there really be any room for compromise, or honestly any bipartisanship, or a willingness, for these opposed powers in working together?

Republicans, or Tea party patriots, the faster you realize the facts, that the Democrats are out to eliminate you as a relevant political force, if not totally eliminate you, because you’re position and opposition to their brand of socialism designed for a total takeover, a total power grab through corruption of the election proses. The better you will be equipped with the power to recognize that you and you alone are the last conservationists of liberty, and freedom in America. If they look at you as an infestation, then you can’t ever compromise your principles in trying to co-govern with the enemies of liberty and freedom, who would deal with any infestation like a third world dictator by eliminating it.

The importance of the debt limit isn’t in limiting government from paying bills. But limiting government in increasing its size, and moving away from its importance of its spending as a driving force in the economy. Future growth borrowed from the bank of China, with the belief that our children will be all too happy to pay these bills, while receiving nothing in return for these payments. Is taxation without representation!

The borrower is a slave to the lender! Borrowing more and more to function as a society, as an economy, or as a government, is just sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

The function of any limit, is to give a warning to the danger of going past your limits, before you even get there, so you can avoid any and all negative consequences for going past them.

Constantly moving your limits, pretending they were always ment to be moved, all because of being ill-equipped to deal with the problem, doesn’t resolve or prevent any problems, nor is it a solution. It is a symptom of the addiction.

Democrats when faced with having to reduce spending on their favorite programs, the project devastation they present, along with some frightful out comes, or some kind of uncomfortable existences, as being inhumane, abusive and uncaring treatment, are the results of policies of the opposition party. Obscuring the facts of finance, that prosperity and wealthy, is never an accomplished goal by being asset poor and mountain of debt rich.

If Liberty is to become extinct it is because the conservationists (GOP conservatives) are not willing to do the hard work, the unpopular work of presenting the arguments in a persuasive way to the public. Only quietly going along, to get along, isn’t governing from the perspective in preserving the constitution for all from all foreign or domestic enemy’s. Compromise isn’t any tool used in making persuasive arguments, but is excepting a more comfortable defeat.

When was an unlimited debt ever the principles of our founding?

Government doesn’t produce anything, it taxes all economic production of the people, and then by definition is a growth inhibitor.

Politically speaking. We must recognize that every dime spent in payment to the interest on our debts, is a drag on future growth, future job creation, future security, future economical innovations, while increasing the size of todays obstacles into impossible ones, for future leaderships to deal with. We today are standing at the generational crossroads, deciding what kind of future our kids will have, or can expect. If we the adults in society or in government, are only interested in working for the extravagances of life, allowing ourselves only to enjoy freedom and liberty. Then we must honestly confess, too our own selfish greed, “That we don’t care about our youth”! What gives us the rights to sell, those freedoms and liberty’s, those God-given rights, that our kids should also be able to expect for themselves, with indifference to enslaving them to foreign banks, and treasonous governments, forcing them to pay for our extravagance of today? The borrower is a slave to the lender! How can we then enjoy our extravagances by selling “Our kids ” and their lives into slavery tomorrow?

Modern third world dictators always use the command and control style of governance in solving a self-made crisis while also reducing any powers that oppose it. The Democrat party, and prehaps some of the Republican party, must see themself’s as the slave masters of tomorrow? By wanting to eliminate all infestations / or opposition to their support of policies like, unlimited debt, and the slow erosion of liberty, their policies only seem to managed the decay, over finding true positive solutions.

When has a Democratic policy, a socialist solution, ever been purposed to the people resulted in a reversal of the social decline within society? Liberal policies have only added to a farther decline. Will the Modern Republican party embrace conservative principles, present them publicly and persuasively, or will they allow liberty’s extinction, by finely drowning it to death, with debt?

In 29 states, you can get fired just for being gay????

Ask yourself if this statement is true???

“Despite the strides we have made in this country to try to ensure equal opportunities, equal treatment and equal pay for all, “all” doesn’t necessarily include someone who is gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. We have laws to protect against workplace discrimination—but not on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. In 29 states, you can get fired just for being gay. In 38 states, you can get fired just for being transgender.”

I was told once, “That government is like making sausages. Everyone loves to eat them, but doesn’t want to know what is in them.” This person then went on to say, “It is complicated, running a government, and making laws and regulations that will suit everyone equally, is down right impossible.”

Making complicated things even more complicated, doesn’t solve much. But making things that are complicated less so, does.

It seem that politicians are purposefully making government, and the laws and regulations they make out of whole cloth, more and more difficult to understand, net alone follow? Throw into the mix, the political pundits who don’t understand what government or what the political leaders are trying to do; or is it that these political pundits are just blindly supporting those ideals no matter what, for some kind of advantages unto themselves?

There was this story the other day that stated that people could be fired if you lived in one of these states saying…(a picture was also posted–which I have also posted in this piece), if you were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and lived in these states you could be fired! Oh no! Often these states are referred to as “Right to work states.”

This term “Right to work”, is being abused. It seems that political pundits are determined to twist its definition and other terms along with it, in a mental no holds barred wrestling match designed to confuse the average voter. Playing mental gymnastics with words and terms or definitions is the kind of word play the progressive left uses to appear superior to everyone. It is just the kind of tactic used, no difference in explaining that government is like making sausages.

The truth of the matter is, the truth is never really explained or presented with these word game–wrestling matches. These games are easily debunked within the issue when the lies and distortions are pointed out. For instance the following definitions and facts do matter. The right to work states laws are stated as….

“Right to work” laws govern hiring of employees. In a nutshell, “right to work” means that a person has the right to work for a company without being required to either join a union or financially support a union. Basically, if you live in a “right to work” state, joining a union, or paying union dues, can’t be a condition of your employment.

“Employment at will” means that either an employer or employee can end a working relationship at any time, for any reason, with no notice. No matter how hard you work, if you upset your boss, no matter how small the incident, you could be out of a job.

The only exceptions are that employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation. That means that discriminatory firings (age, sex, religion, race…the usual suspects) are still illegal in “employment at will” states.

So how is it possible to get fired from your job if you are–gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, when employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation?

I don’t believe this is an issue of equality. I do however believe it is an issue of gaining superiority.

When political pundits add pictures that are for the most part visually dishonest, distracting from the truth, or facts, and the population is over-run with political lies and distortions. The 30 second sound-bite, or an attractive picture, seems normal to most voters that also don’t take any time for themselves to search for the truth, or use common sense to say the least in exposing the political lie. Throw into the mix the successful augment that “If you’re against something, you are also cold, un-caring, cruel, less charitable.” as the new way in building the superior argument, or presentation.

The point of the matter is if it takes lies, distortions, re-arranging definitions of words, untrue acts, or actions, or reactions. in order to manipulate people into excepting something that is inferior, how is that being superior, or even supporting something that is defined as superior? The truth doesn’t need the support of any distortion, or lie, to make it so. The inferior does!

I’m amazed that there aren’t more people that are willing to call these political hacks, or pundits, what they are! “LIARS! LIARS! LIARS!”, and then some?

It isn’t that I have an ax to grind, these issues of being gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender doesn’t affect me personally. But those political hacks or pundits who are trying to bury common sense with BS will effect 100% of everyone. I believe in supporting the truth, regardless of the axes people grind!

Workplace Discrimination « Give A Damn http://www.wegiveadamn.org/issues/workplace-discrimination/

Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College

 Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College campus in Cypress, Texas, after a male suspect reportedly used a small knife, ran from building to building and randomly attacked individuals along the way.

The conditions of the victims are unclear, but four were taken by life flight for treatment, which indicates severe injuries. Twelve of the victims in all were hospitalized and two refused treatment. Witnesses reported seeing students with stab wounds to the neck.

Police got the initial report at 11:15 a.m. A suspect with a knife was reported on the sprawling campus on the Northwest side of Houston and there were reports of multiple stab victims. The school was placed on lockdown. The length of the attack is unclear, but the suspect was reportedly taken down by a student.

@FoxNews: a dozen injured in stabbing attack at #Houston-area college campus http://fxn.ws/10FZW8z

Banning the weapon, any weapon is the legislative easy way out to governing. Banning evil intention is also hard if not impossible to do, without some kind of thought police. But if we had thought police, any brain-dead legislator purposing a weapons ban, should be arrested for crimes against humanity; or at the very least held responsible for future victims of violence at the hands of such weapons, because criminals don’t follow laws or regulations.

It just shows that controlling or banning the weapons of choice, chosen by the criminal isn’t a deterrent to violence. Nor is there any more safety to our collages or students that go to them. To then glorify the need to control any weapon as a way to reduce violence is just not supported by the facts or statics. To use violent acts by deranged people looking for the easiest victims possible, as a way to reduce the personal individual responsibility’s (not to mention your God-given right) to protect one’s self, is by its self an act of legislative derangement.

Our representatives should use common sense over that of a knee-jerk reaction to remained popular, or maintaining their electability. After all they protect themselves with armed guards or police officers. Why then should the citizenry be reduced to a second class importance with their protection over violent people doing violence against them?

Clearly a weapon in the hands of any individual then possesses the power in that situation, to use it for good or evil, to use it in senseless acts of violence or putting an end to them. I seem to remember that every act of violence ends 100% of the time with a weapon in the hands of a good person willing to also use that weapon against violent perpetrators of crime, risking personal injury to themselves for someone else’s safety.

Banning any weapons in the hands of the people; expecting them to protect themselves until police officers arrive on the scene would be just as deranged as to expect police officers to go weaponless into the same situation to disarm the perpetrators. Clearly our legislators wouldn’t allow themselves to have unarmed police officers as their protection detail, even after, should they ever become successful in banning weapons?

So the theory becomes fact! A weapon in the hands of a good person doesn’t create future victims. But evenly distributes, balancing the power in the struggle for the ultimate power between the would be victim, and the deranged violent person.

Third world transformation of the USA

Do you remember just what was meant when Mr. Obama said? “The transformation of America.”?

 Update Houston; an assistant U.S. Attorney who has been prosecuting 34 members of the white supremacist Aryan Brotherhood has suddenly announced he is withdrawing from the case because of what he called “security concerns.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jay Hileman didn’t say what those concerns were.

But a friend of his – who happens to be one of the lawyers for the defense in the case, thinks he’s probably worried about his family.

If government employees are in fear of doing their jobs, of prosecuting the worsted of the worsted in criminals because of personal threats, or “security concerns.” then where do all of the citizens of this country stand? How is it possible for the government to protect us?

I’m personally tired of the government or their spokes puppets standing at the podium and calling for new gun regulations, like back ground checks for the law-abiding citizen who wish to purchase a legal and 2nd amendment protected gun. Not that I’m against regulation, but what I’m against is an increase of regulations, and over regulation, like that of also implementing a national data base that can and more than likely will be abused by government at some point in time in the future.

I seem to remember what Washington said of the government, ” It is evil, but sadly a necessary evil.”

The government puppet and chief said the other day (paraphrased) “We need to have back ground checks to make the country safer from gun violence….” They (as in the liberal mind-set) still see the “GUN” as the problem? When the problem is with people possessing a normal state of mind. The criminal element is a small segment of society, which has a false belief in the tenants of unrestrained ability’s in their actions against others.

Think of it–the government thinks it can keep its citizenry safe from all kinds of dangers, by eliminating guns! But the problem is not with the implementation of some regulation/law/limitation. But the problem is with some of the population that will not ever subjugate themselves to following laws, and regulations of the land. Who are these people? How will the government best control these people, while protecting the freedoms and liberties of the law-abiding? There isn’t any population testing available in make any determinations, who will act within the laws of the land or who will not, until a law is broken?

In third world country’s law-abiding people are in-between a rock and a hard place. The government who makes the laws and the criminal elements who act with little concern for them. In this update from Houston, it shows that there is fear within the government legal justice system, whose job it is to in force the laws of the land. But violent criminal elements are acting out to intimidate the system in their favor. Stories like this are all too often recurring in any third world country. Google any third world country, and see for yourself. Of course you will also see that in these country’s people have lost their rights to protect themselves, depending totally on the government. Would you trust the Mexican legal justice system? Remembering just who has the weapons, and who does not have them, and whether the government is or isn’t corrupt. Does it surprise anyone why people come across the border illegally into the USA?

Why would we then trust in a government in this country saying, for all intents and purposes “We the government will protect you.” This same body of political puppets will not protect you by securing the borders, but demands of you to give up your own protection of yourself. Have we forgotten that no one will ever arrive from the government just in the nick of time, just before an act of violence towards you is committed?

It seems we have all kinds of money to barrow, and waste, yet not enough to pay for a super hero like super-man who always arrived in a nick of time, along with his can of whip-ass, as his weapon to swiftly dispensed swift justice towards those armed criminals of the day. Until that day, let the criminal element worry what is behind closed doors? Because it certainly isn’t super-man. With this story out of Houston they point towards a more violent criminal element as being responsible…

“In fact, there are experts who say this looks more like the work of a Mexican drug cartel. But whatever it is, to see this kind of violence happening here in America, it’s like we suddenly woke up in a third world country – except with better plumbing.”

The more we change ourselves into a governmental protected class, the less protection we will have. The more we have politicians espousing the abilities of protecting you so you don’t have to. We will resemble a third world nation where protection comes at a price no matter who’s supposedly offering it.

If the government could protect anyone except from a military conflict of some kind. Why wouldn’t they choose to protect their own employees involved in the legal justice system, from violent crime before it could happen to them? It is hard to ask the government to protect us, when we have stories like this one, which demonstrate they usually arrive after the fact.

What country IS this& http://mynw.me/YVCaFC

What are friends for in this parallel life’s journey within this social asylum. A kick in the…

After all what are friends for? A kick in the…? At lest they should posses and present honesty their advice. We shouldn’t expect anything else from them? A true friend would be using, brutal honesty and the power of a friends observations, to help a friend in trouble that they also love. We therefore should expect nothing but honest comments, observations, criticisms, advice, as they guide, support, and commiserate with us in our travels along our parallel life’s journey within this social asylum.

If we take a deep breath, and really listen to what is being said, and quietly taking some time to think… really think about what is being said, instead of angrily reacting emotionally. We may gain some wisdom.

A friend of a friend wrote some profound words, as their observations to what might as well be a doctors prognosis, a temperature reading of a sick social asylum, and the final analyses to what disease we are fighting. With all sicknesses or diseases, the medicine are usually bitter to taste. Prehaps this brave soul, this social MD’s words will help to bring about at the very least a recognition of the condition, as well the stage of the disease, and a willingness to take the bitter pill, over that of just excepting our demise? Surviving any sickness, or disease, requires a willingness to fight it!

At what point is a freedom fighter a social terrorist, an obstructionist, an infectious organism, to the progressive liberal mindset that sits in opposition to the concept of what America was founded upon? What happened to those same concepts of life liberty and the pursuits of happiness, or of individual freedom, and the responsibility’s that go along with it?  Why is it, in supporting these things we have been viewed politically as “Obstructionists” when we indeed are nothing but “Conversationist / Freedom Fighters” who would like to preserve America as founded? When did these values lose their luster, or social value, while getting replaced with socialism’s false guarantees? Socialism is birthing the utopia of the mesmerized, envious lazy minded individuals, through its religion of unrealistic pursuits, of equal out comes, and average existences, and misery for all. A managed decay is its only contributions to the world at its very best?

Why have we failed to recognize the failed policies of socialism as our politicians present them to us? When has socialistic utopias the world over ever supported themself’s? They have all needed to be rescued or bailed-out, by free market capitalism in order to continue to exist. For those who believe in the concepts of evolution ( where everything must adapt, and only the strongest will survive) why do we as a people support political failures, or the weakest of political parasitic organisms, where misery is their greatest contribution to their populations and to the world? Why then would we who live in the shadows of such great failures, and misery’s, volunteer to do the same, without much as giving any opposition to it?

There has been no greater waste of resources of human efforts, and charity. Then those misguided contributions, given as emotional gift of charity; in the hopes of helping people while supporting political leaders and their policies that have done nothing but take from the population. Destroying human dignity, human potential, the ability in improving themself’s, or talents, or even their lot in life.

Thanks Mark for passing along this friend of your statements.

Mark M
The saddest, albeit possibly most accurate short message you will read that was  written by a USMC Vet. ( I can’t argue with any of it.  Passing it along as it was received. )
He wrote: The American Dream ended (on November 6th) in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled… and developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind. A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union Members,  Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell’s America. The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch…the Pit Bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod, along with international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order. Our side ran two candidates who couldn’t even win their own home states, and the circus fattster Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing “post Sandy” tribute that elevated the “Commander-in-Chief” to Mother Teresa status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never again comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired. You will never again out vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not moderates–not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to “white guilt” and political correctness….. I’m done.

Safety hostage takers! Presidential thievery! And the sequester.

Presidential thievery through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices of policies within the sequester is coming to you soon! We must be prepared to act as informed voters to these subject matters. Because acting like A.D.D. voters of the low informed kind, is of no good to the defence of the nations liberty’s.

With the negatives to the sequester looming, how will it affect the economy, seems to be the only debate among politicians? No one is interested in making a real effort in discovering how best to avoid the negatives within the sequester, just the magnification of them. Mr. Obama solution to his created problem seems to be, emphasizing the problems and presenting the other political party in the most negative lime light, through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices. Mr. Obama, who would rather choose to party, celebrate, or vacation, then in finding solutions himself. His offerings, presented to the economic Gods of socialism, inflict maximum pain on the population while common sense is being quickly swept under the rug, hoping that no one will noticed.

Under the flag of procrastination our government governs one crisis into many more. In a blink-of-an-eye Mr. Obama is just now realizing that we have to do something. like a kid who is realizing that he has a science project do in days,  and has wasted almost all of his time, finely decides to do something. His reaction; Chooses to blame others for his own procrastination.

A look at the cuts and the chilling impact the administration says they would have on the economy goes like this. Find the most uncomfortable services that the public will most likely complain about and cut them relentlessly….

-Defense: Troops at war would be protected, but there’d be fewer Air Force flying hours, less training for some Army units and cuts in naval forces.

-Health: The National Institutes of Health would lose $1.6 billion, trimming cancer

-Food and agriculture: About 600,000 low-income pregnant women and new mothers would lose food aid and nutrition education

-Homeland Security: Fewer border agents

transportation: Most of the Federal Aviation Administration’s 47,000 employees would face furloughs, including air traffic controllers,

-Environment: Diminished Environmental Protection Agency monitoring of oil spills,

-Labor: More than 3.8 million people jobless for six months or longer could see their unemployment benefits reduced by as much as 9.4 percent.

-Housing: The Department of Housing and Urban Development said about 125,000 poor households could lose benefits from the agency’s Housing Choice Voucher program and risk becoming homeless.

-Not to mention other idle threats made to the citizens of this nation, like Joe Biden who said (paraphrased), “An increase of rape and violent crimes may be on the rise without increased spending on police officers and other public safety services.” As the justification for more uncontrolled, unwise, wasteful spending.

Just a good reason to have control of your God-given rights, and not the government taking them away, like their attempts with the second amendment.

But then we have hostage takers in office, where they would rather take some needed services, placing them in a so to speak head-lock, and placing a gun to those services heads, demand more of the same reckless spending on your children’s credit card issued by the bank of China, or else say good-by to these services!

What kind of politicians uses these kinds of tactics against the people of his or her’s own nation? It isn’t any good long-term policies or of any good for the people. But more bad policies piled up against or upon past bad policies, all the while risking the people’s safety, by the same people, sworn to protect and up hold their safety. In other words, these politicians are threatening the safety because they refuse to do the job of, cutting waste from the government’s budget, in so doing they threaten, instead of protecting the growth of the economy. Cutting the waste out of government or shrinking the size of the same would be limiting to the tax burden on the people, and pro-growth.

There is no differences to our modern-day politicians, and modern-day mugger’s on the streets of Chicago. Everyone knows that mugger’s are breaking the law and acting without human decency, the other uses the power over the people justifying their own actions of theft, through making laws that destroys human dignity, good will, and trust.

Mr. Obama created the sequester, rather than now excepting the blame for a bad policy and idea, as well as acting like an adult person in finding solutions. His actions are that of just implementing political leverage. As the head of the Democratic party, the commander and chief of thug politics, and political thievery, Mr. Obama has shown his true colors of Chicago politics, and corruption of the political proses. Policies like this will only cause the people to make every effort in protecting themselves from the long arm of the government, causing a farther slow-down in the economy at worse, or more of the same at best.

With Obama in office, the people shouldn’t expecting the government to protect the people from the barbarians at the gates, it will be more like….. Pay your toll (higher taxes) for more of the same wasteful spending, or be thrown to the mercies of those barbarians within our gates.