In 29 states, you can get fired just for being gay????

Ask yourself if this statement is true???

“Despite the strides we have made in this country to try to ensure equal opportunities, equal treatment and equal pay for all, “all” doesn’t necessarily include someone who is gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. We have laws to protect against workplace discrimination—but not on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. In 29 states, you can get fired just for being gay. In 38 states, you can get fired just for being transgender.”

I was told once, “That government is like making sausages. Everyone loves to eat them, but doesn’t want to know what is in them.” This person then went on to say, “It is complicated, running a government, and making laws and regulations that will suit everyone equally, is down right impossible.”

Making complicated things even more complicated, doesn’t solve much. But making things that are complicated less so, does.

It seem that politicians are purposefully making government, and the laws and regulations they make out of whole cloth, more and more difficult to understand, net alone follow? Throw into the mix, the political pundits who don’t understand what government or what the political leaders are trying to do; or is it that these political pundits are just blindly supporting those ideals no matter what, for some kind of advantages unto themselves?

There was this story the other day that stated that people could be fired if you lived in one of these states saying…(a picture was also posted–which I have also posted in this piece), if you were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and lived in these states you could be fired! Oh no! Often these states are referred to as “Right to work states.”

This term “Right to work”, is being abused. It seems that political pundits are determined to twist its definition and other terms along with it, in a mental no holds barred wrestling match designed to confuse the average voter. Playing mental gymnastics with words and terms or definitions is the kind of word play the progressive left uses to appear superior to everyone. It is just the kind of tactic used, no difference in explaining that government is like making sausages.

The truth of the matter is, the truth is never really explained or presented with these word game–wrestling matches. These games are easily debunked within the issue when the lies and distortions are pointed out. For instance the following definitions and facts do matter. The right to work states laws are stated as….

“Right to work” laws govern hiring of employees. In a nutshell, “right to work” means that a person has the right to work for a company without being required to either join a union or financially support a union. Basically, if you live in a “right to work” state, joining a union, or paying union dues, can’t be a condition of your employment.

“Employment at will” means that either an employer or employee can end a working relationship at any time, for any reason, with no notice. No matter how hard you work, if you upset your boss, no matter how small the incident, you could be out of a job.

The only exceptions are that employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation. That means that discriminatory firings (age, sex, religion, race…the usual suspects) are still illegal in “employment at will” states.

So how is it possible to get fired from your job if you are–gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, when employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation?

I don’t believe this is an issue of equality. I do however believe it is an issue of gaining superiority.

When political pundits add pictures that are for the most part visually dishonest, distracting from the truth, or facts, and the population is over-run with political lies and distortions. The 30 second sound-bite, or an attractive picture, seems normal to most voters that also don’t take any time for themselves to search for the truth, or use common sense to say the least in exposing the political lie. Throw into the mix the successful augment that “If you’re against something, you are also cold, un-caring, cruel, less charitable.” as the new way in building the superior argument, or presentation.

The point of the matter is if it takes lies, distortions, re-arranging definitions of words, untrue acts, or actions, or reactions. in order to manipulate people into excepting something that is inferior, how is that being superior, or even supporting something that is defined as superior? The truth doesn’t need the support of any distortion, or lie, to make it so. The inferior does!

I’m amazed that there aren’t more people that are willing to call these political hacks, or pundits, what they are! “LIARS! LIARS! LIARS!”, and then some?

It isn’t that I have an ax to grind, these issues of being gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender doesn’t affect me personally. But those political hacks or pundits who are trying to bury common sense with BS will effect 100% of everyone. I believe in supporting the truth, regardless of the axes people grind!

Workplace Discrimination « Give A Damn http://www.wegiveadamn.org/issues/workplace-discrimination/

Advertisements

the true war on poverty.

The use & excuse of slavery must end. I’d like a laundry list of Black accomplishments taught in schools all over the country as the true black history of America. Black people need to see how historically they’ve been, a success in America despite parties. I’m not saying “our” history is more important… it’s that Blacks need a newer reference point of American values than what occurred through slavery. Black people need to know that they don’t need government programs in order to succeed. Exactly… we need references where Black people were successful without Government dependency. A real US History explained in a true positive light, that will inspire and rekindle human potential, and the pursuit of excellence, over that of being a new kept people destined for lower wage jobs. We need to rise above that education system that teaches the values of the political race baiters. But so it seems that neither party is really interested in edifying Black people to their contributions includes the NAACP, as worthwhile contributions in making improvements to American society as a whole. So the Democrats and the Republicans must assume equal guilt for the continued human misery and wasted moneys spent on the war on poverty over the past 40 years. We should stop complaining about the wrongs of our ancestors and that of slavery, for those things we can do nothing about. But this generation must stop hiding their guilt with respect to the war on poverty in hopes to hide this generation wrong just long enough so as not to be held accountable for them.

Destroying imaginations?

In the world of education, presented by educators that also draw their paychecks from the federal and state governments, it is plan to see they mostly posses a leaning towards a liberal mindset. So is it good to question motive, if any, to their teaching methods, in an effort to avoided a public education that resembles more of a indoctrination to a liberal philosophy, over unbiased pursuit of knowledge based on truth?

At what point is it too much of an education to give to developing minds, and who should decide if so? Can an education do more damage to a human mind, then good?

Colorado second-grader suspended for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess http://soc.li/QKLVU5V

Aren’t schools supposed to provide educations within a supervised safe environment, for purposes of expanding young minds no matter what the age of that student? Isn’t an education in part a shared responsibility and the job of parents, along with teachers, to inspire imaginations of young people to dream the impossible, to look behind the curtain of life with curiosity?

Every great thinker and inventor has used an active imagination, driving the individual to dream, to innovate, in making dreams and unknown technologies into realities produced in the present. Also known by catch phrase as “Moving forwards”.

An education is bridling the power of thought, inspired to action, in moving towards that future yet imagined. Without the active use of imaginations in our world, we wouldn’t have computers, or all sorts of entertainments, or even books to read, net alone things that are common place for most people used daily without thought, like cars. So when a school system limits a child’s imagination, are they not also robbing that child of their education, or at least damaging or retarding that child’s human potential in an unmeasured way, by potentially crushing their ability’s, or willingness to imagination farther?

Even John Lennon had a song called “Imagine” where people were called to imagine a world different to the present world, different to the world that existed when he wrote the song, different to today’s standards. Had he been this little boy in school, he too could have been suspended, by expressing unpopular imaginations. Can an imagination go too far, and becomes just as dangerous as a weapon?

So no matter where we stand on education, pro or con, we should expect a healthy dose of imagination to be encouraged in our youth, for the pursuit of a well-rounded education, from a school system charged with turning out an educated adult. An education devoid of including, critical thought, or thinking outside of the box, without also including in that realm the encouragement of the use of imagination. Is not really an education, but a political correct indoctrination, a type of brain washing through emotional reasoning or emotional peer pressure in administering a popular education. Children are at a disadvantage in being able to reason philosophically with adults, therefore venerable to the political or liberal presentations masked as an unbiased education.

Who decides what is a good imagination or a bad one, when we are discussing, or defining the thoughts or actions of a child that creates it. Are we to believe that people are born evil or good, so actions of said people are then predetermined? Is there at some point in time, an age of accountability, to what may be considered right and wrong things to imagine? Who then should decide, or teach what is or isn’t proper imagination? The thought police?

Colorado second-grader suspended for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess http://soc.li/QKLVU5V

In remembering what it was like to be a child, when everything seemed unlimited, where the many possibilities were always possible, where the impossible wasn’t recognized as obstacles, but just a short-term delays on our way to those destinations of personal greatness. Have we forgotten what satisfaction, or a sense of accomplishment felt like, even those imagined which inspired us in making an effort? Why should we then throw the political correct wet blanket over a child’s ability to dream, or to imagine, because what others only see as an imagined threat?

In our world of political correctness what damage have we created within this little boy’s education, or personal views of what is good or bad, what is good or evil, or which is stronger, or who will prevail in any struggle? Even in all of the movies that Hollywood produces there are elements of good and evil, where good always wins. In today’s world there isn’t any question in the argument, the only question that remains is who will define it? What is truly shocking is the carefree attitude of this boy’s parent in accepting her schools actions with regards to the education received, by the veiled attempt of that school in destroying youthful imagination, without parental outrage.

Super heroes who are battling evil, or who are trying to re-adjusting the balance of power between good and evil, in the support of a positive moral compass equally for everyone. Should not only be found in comic books designed for the imaginations of kids, but displayed in real life actions. Parents should never lose sight of their super hero status. Those bigger than life, those real life characters within parents, who in their childs eyes are always to be their super heroes; those same people whose jobs are to be defending by preserving the rights of kids, to be a kid, allowing them to enjoy their innocence, over that of being corrupted at a young age by a social brain washing of political correctness.

Parents are therefore that last line of defence, that supper hero re-adjusting that balance of power, that will tug and pull at their childs emotions. So imagine for a moment if you will, if you still have an imagination, and an unbiased willingness to use it? When has a super hero ever refuse to do those thankless jobs big and small, or allow themselves the freedom in giving in to the mindset or notion that evil will prevail? Saying to themselves,” So what is the use?” Simply because the job may be uncomfortable to do?

It is time conservatives push back respectively against the liberal mindset of political correctness, the insanity that suspends a second-grader for throwing IMAGINARY grenade during recess in Colorado, and sees nothing wrong with passing out the “morning after pill” to kids in New York schools, unknown to their parents, or with any knowledge of their medical histories of those young students receiving them.

Some NYC schools to offer  the morning-after-pill  http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-57518735/some-nyc-schools-to-offer-morning-after-pills/?tag=socsh via @CBSNews

This is the kind of mindset that has no future!!  Are we to remain free, with our liberty’s intact, to give to our children as their inheritance that same liberty that we enjoy. Then we must evoke the power of being that super hero, and imagine victory.

facebook jail candidates

Just three days after Facebook jailed yours truly, for making friend requests, or too many friend requests, either way I’m now able to make new request of friends again. The question is for how long? Should we start a pool on how long before Facebook restricts me for a fifth time? There are numerous requests by members asking me to reach out to their friends so my initial days of freedom might be short. During my incarceration we have added many to this group who are obvious candidates to become cyberfriends as well.

If I re-begin a campaign to include them will it led to more jail time? We also must include the Facebook enticements themselves; you know those suggested adds of people with mutual friends. The continuous questioning by Facebook, ” you may also know this person?” sending all of the pictures along with obvious button to friend this person. “Satan! Get ye behind me, and away from me”!

My current term of freedom to push buttons at will, free from punishment, is the result of restricting myself to only request  friends with those who have 100 mutual friends or more. Obviously that didn’t matter because of my last restrictions took place under the same set of rules for myself.

My rules, the ones I have for myself will change without notice, to Facebook or any other social networking pages, as I see fit. Not as you may instruct me! Just so Facebook knows where I’m coming from.

A man changed against his will, is of the same opinions still!!!!

I find that most people who have also reported that they too have been restricted, have posted as I have about politics, religion. The two biggies. The two most common starters of arguments. The third is free speech. Those who would use its restriction, only demonstrates a willingness to retard thought, knowledge, and opinion of others. They must be supporters of the retarded, the willfully stupid, the idiots coalition of restricted knowledge. Because I have a diploma of the college of hard knocks. I also believe in the power of self-education through critical thinking.

Because humans have yet to be mass-produced as of yet, resembling one mind and body fresh off the assembly line. I will reserve the right to be different by design, by choice that my creator granted me to also make for myself.
Your guesses is as good as mine, as how long it will be untill Facebook flexes their muscles and places me into Facebook jail. Your guess should include both date and time, or number of days before the inevitable occurs.

If your on restriction / or in Facebook’s jail? You can request a fellow-inmate friend, by hitting the friending button. After all if we are to be restricted together, like you are in school detention. Then they must also have learned that it pays to advertize if you can produce the merchandise.

My restrictions then must be saying that I give “HOT TALK”!

Free speech has no bounds, and true friends are the ties that bind. United we stand. divided we fall.

Come on! join the bad boy club, friend me, or at the very least take a good guess untill my next restriction. Have some fun with it. I am!!

Life is to short not to give “HOT TALK ” on Facebook, think of what Facebook would be like if we all sounded the same, or we wouldn’t be allowed to talk at all……. crickets!!

All the best.

Choices of man-made Gods.

Choices of man-made Gods.

We are in control now. Do not make an attempt to control your own lives, the horizontal, the vertical, or even what has become the average. We, those who know just what is best for you, will decide for you. No need to tax your own brain cells to make an effort. For we who are the Government who knows best. We will decide on your behalf in all things.

“The latest move from the city that’s set trends by banned smoking in bars and trans fats in foods involves sugary drinks sold at restaurants, fast-food chains, theaters, delis, office cafeterias and other places that fall under the New York City Board of Health’s regulation by March 2013. Exempt will be drinks sold in convenience and grocery stores, as well as dairy and alcohol-based beverages. Restaurants with self-serve soda fountains will be prohibited from giving out cups larger than 16 ounces, even for diet drinks, but consumers will be allowed refills. “From a recent publications announcement.

No other U.S. city has tried to tackle obesity by restricting portion sizes at restaurants, but city officials wanted to take action as a way of getting a skeptical public to embrace the idea that empty-calorie foods are a menace. The use of the health board has become nothing short of a new form of herding the general public into a smaller world where making their own choices for themselves is pointless.

It isn’t whether or not the public can make such choices. But more the public has put government into a position of controlling needless costs, and expensed through socialized healthcare. Public health experts around the nation are sure to sit up and take notice of this ruling on health. More importantly the Obama administration / the regime are probably rubbing their hands together with anticipation. These federal puppeteer’s of the public’s mindset have been involved in the greatest social engineering in America’s 237 year history.

Mayor Michael Doomberg likens himself as a reinventor of normal, through the use of the power of the government. He likened his restrictions on sugar, and soft-drinks, to the banning of lead paint. Therefore saving humanity from the horrors of it. His war on childhood diabetes, the same kind found to be most prevalent in overweight adults as the true enemy to any improvements government can provide to public health. But secretly he knows that saving people from themselves will save future dollars as the number one resource on the government’s endangered list of resources. It has very little to do with looking out for his fellow-man.

Michael Doomberg concedes the ban will not solve the obesity epidemic alone. Yet has trouble to mention publicly  that it is more of an effort to prolong the impending doom of socialism from running out of other people’s money, while providing a social healthcare of sorts.

One of the calling cards of socialism is that they will control every aspect of life for everyone under their control; under the guided mindset, they know what is best. They point to the policies of the conservative movements as some kind of moralists. “You can’t do this, or that — it isn’t right.” they say as they push against the religious moral rules and boundaries. In other words, the liberals are warring against Religious moral codes / GOD, while pushing a code of their own based on a moral less value system, free from all accountability’s.

Any governmental from of rule, that says that we must control the sugar, salt, trans-fat, smoke from smoking indoors, the kinds of foods our kids eat in school or food supplied to the homeless from religious charity’s, and so on, blah,blah,blah! Isn’t looking out for the good health of the population as a whole. In fact this liberal mindset which takes the ability of choice in the names of the for mentioned activities away from people. Only wishes to extend the ability to make choice in areas in individual life styles that brings society down slowly to its same end as suicide! They say nothing or pass no restrictions on or about adolescent parenting, children making the choice without parent involvement in choosing abortions, legalization of marijuana, the distribution of free birth control (despite that this promotes an irresponsible life style.), the promotion of slothful activity’s and lifestyles (By providing an overabundance of social services without any regard to the damage it brings to the individual themselves.

Social governments always support the control of the portion of society that stands for an uplifting of individuals and values. While showing a total lack of concern in controlling individual choices of those kinds that destroy individuals from within.  People naturally already have those tendencies towards self-destruction within themselves. No real need to promote them by governmental regulations.

There is nothing as destructive as a misguided government policy that goes out of its way to destroy “ Equal opportunity “ and replaces it with “equal out comes”, at the expense of killing for all individual personally, their GOD given potential. It is through the expansion of individual talents, that individuals have opportunity’s to improve themselves by marketing those talents into the free market system. Offering goods and services to other people that they can freely choose for themselves. Based on goods and services that they seek and desire to have. In short this was the pursuit of happiness that Jefferson was talking about.

The legalization of being able to smoke pot like what happened in the state of Washington, or the ban of sugar, salt, trans fat, or extra-large soda drinks, or being able to feed the poor, like what New York is pushing. These kinds of regulations that will certainly be national presentations within Obamacare regulations. Seem to be stupid regulations presented from the merchants of smart. This has had nothing to do with smart, or for the common good of people in society down to the individual level. It has however everything to do with pleasing the useful idiots in society to gained power, while repurchasing that power in future elections as cheaply as they can, with the new drug of freebie give-a-ways.

The Democratic Party is the party of “NO”! Saying no to any moral codes, while promoting irresponsible living without morals. The Democratic Party who for the most part stands for anything against moral values, along with Republicans who support, a relaxing of standards, in compromising principles. These are the social engineers of the day, the leaders standing at the helm. Who only are managing the decay, as if it is the new social order? The new presentation of a man-made heaven utopia, void of GOD.

Quote “Is the new boss the same as the old boss?” the rock band the WHO.

Irony of Liberal pipe dreams

Irony of Liberal pipe dreams

Washington State jumps in the lead of the rest of the country except Colorado. On election night stoner’s nervous with anticipation, hoping that Washington voters were going to legalize marijuana. A liberal dream of sorts now for years in the making was about to become reality. Electricity was in the air. Pot smokers were waiting for the all clear signal, before lighting up the stash of pot they were hording for a celebration of legal recreational use of pot in the state.

They never seem too concerned with the fact that state law could never supersede the federal government national controlled substances laws. In affect if any state legalizes a substance that is controlled by the federal government, they are then over stepping their power, undermining the federal governments authority’s. The state of Arizona tried to enforce federal immigration laws that the government wasn’t enforcing at the time. Passing a law to empower themselves, with the support of the population ability to vote on it. It passed and the state of Arizona was sued by the government.

Just what is wrong with the recreational use of pot? People smoke, and drink alcohol, both of which are legal drugs, the state also collects tax revenues from them. So why not pot? We are willing to pay our share of tax to be able to use pot, if we decide. They exclaimed excitedly.

Opponents would argue that pot is just a gate way drug. That it would lower inhabitation to a point of users being willing to use other stronger drugs. Besides, pot is readily available to pre-teens and quite popular in high-school, despite of the fact that it is illegal. Expanding the popularity of it by legalizing it, would certainly expand problems in our school systems? This drug is a problem with the development of our youth today, who would be tomorrow’s adult leaders, parents, and the expected productive members of society. Supporters of legalization of pot say. “We could limit its use and availability similarly to the limits of the purchases of alcohol.” Completely overlooking the facts, that school age kids are getting it now, despite of the facts that it is limited completely for everyone under the law of today.

Washington’s pot smoker supporters were all too willing to explain their positive position for a favorable vote. It would reduce law enforcement. Saving money, or at the very least redirect resources towards other more serious infractions of the law. This would reduce prison populations for a pot conviction. It would increase revenues to the state, while at the same time reduce revenue flows to drug cartels. All of which was presented as if it were some enlightenment within some societal change, presented as a great win, win for everyone.

What these supporters never mention is the possibilities of declining health for pot abusers, or the increasing costs of their healthcare as a direct result of the abuse of pot. When asked, they explained this away with a smile and the words “Obama-care”. I guess they figure it is free, so who cares if they ruin their health? The negative effect on society is never even mentioned or considered, just swept under the rug so to speak. More often they excuse themselves with attitudes …. “Alcohol is legal, so why not pot?”

The liberal law makers who also support the legalization, seemed to have indulged to a point of being comfortable numb. Hypocrisy overlooked completely! Liberals often refer to conservatives / republicans as the party of “NO!”  Creating the mindset within their supporters, that republicans like parents are trying to take the fun away from life or the very least adolescence.

They never seem to examine themselves and their policies of intolerance for people in general making choices for themselves and accepting the consequences of those choices. Never mind if they are good, or bad.  It is by design that the liberal utopia presented as a lifestyle choice, is all-controlling and more likely to say “NO”, then conservatives. The belief in consequences, allowing people to weigh out the potential of them within any choices that they would make. As being the guiding forces in life are for the most part conservative’s policies. Liberals assume that people would not choose their ideals. So they support their ideals with regulations, laws, entitlements, or the use of manipulations to farther them into the mainstream of society.

Example: Controlling calories for school kids. Controlling sugar consumption (Like soft drinks), gun control, regulations of businesses, the very subject matters taught in school or not taught in school, controlling Religious expressions, or practices of religious policies. Finally demanding who shall buying a product in the open market place, or suffer the consequences of penalty’s, fines, or worse.

Making these choices on your own isn’t acceptable. Liberals just say “NO!”

Liberals are more open to saying “Yes” through, by their support of releasing themself’s of consequences as a result of someone choosing for themselves poorly. This standard is presented as being charitable, or their contribution to the adolescent public, as kind support of the down trodden, and the minority’s. Overlooking the realities of their brand of caring, as the contributing factor to things that are at the least damaging to individual people, or even excepting these policies are also damaging to society as well, both present and in the future, all at the same time.

Example: Adolescent pregnancy, or abortions, on demand abortion without parental approval or knowledge, legalization of pot, frees birth control, restraint in feeding the poor or limiting charity’s from doing it, the ability to abuse drugs and alcohol while getting the full support of welfare, food stamps, free healthcare in treating the ailments of these kinds of abuses without the proper help of trying to curing the problems of abuse. Just to name a few. Checkout the link if you’re questioning it?

Feeding The Homeless BANNED In Major Cities All Over America http://shar.es/Gtm6j via @Revelation1217

For the most part liberals say with regards to those issues, “We cannot tell people how to live their lives.” Yet the Irony is they have little problems in telling society to except a reduction of expectation for people to live life to some religious moral standard, or responsibility’s supported in religious practices as they are taught. For the most part Liberals are always pushing against these values, forcing everyone to except their belief system as that of freedom. While enslaving people eternally in a life of youthful bliss, entrusted only with making childlike choices without responsibilities. The government promotes the acceptance that government is becoming their new parent in life. For the most part people are forgetting their own adolescent youth. That youth that we all had where we couldn’t wait to become old enough to take care of ourselves, in order to escape our own parents and their parental controls over us. So a new liberal born into accepting the new normal, unable to discover the misguided irony’s on their own. Viewing any opposition as an effort in controlling freedoms won, personal choice, and responsibility avoided.

The pipe dream, the one where it is easier to trick people to believe in the fantasies of,” you can have it all without effort.” The protection method to these ironies brought to life, are the use of trickery, smoke and mirrors, presenting complete safety from life’s storms, while set-up the house of cards with pleasurable luxuries. All the while placing the cost of those luxuries on someone else’s credit card. Allowing mind altering drugs, alcohol, or irresponsible actions to deceive, as well rules the day. Allowing the comfortably numb to build a future on the foundations of self-abuse, as a practice of good building methods, as they build their own house of cards in the middle of a puddle of gasoline while holding a burning roman candle. Liberals and the people under their spells of forever young, never even seeing the dangers of their own choices, or the irony’s in them. They work hard to stay in front of the avalanche of explosions within the life of irresponsible living. They find themselves looking over the fence at those people who haven’t made those kinds of choices for themselves. Filled with envy, contempt, and anger at life, for being unfair, they look to escape the realities of their own choosing. This is the liberal’s pipe dream of ironies, built on the foundations of poor choice, blinded by the never-ending search of instant success within the state of mind of forever young. Life as they see it will never be better than the next time they are conformably numb.

Alternate reality of political correctness.

Within the alternate reality world of the liberal left. Political correctness, is only one of the tools to be found within the tool box of forced results. Untill it becomes necessary to use the only other tool within the toolbox. THE POINT OF A GUN! These left minded people rarely use their right mind in anything. So they are by definition half-witted.

Take religion for instance. The liberal tosses moral values to the wind, and settles into the redefining of what is to be popular. Presenting the popular point of view for the new moral. If you disagree look to the values that are being supported present day Democratic party. One may even look to the values of the president of the United States. He claims to be Christian but acts like he has a favored spot in his heart for the Muslim Islamist’s of the world. Is this attitude, the fundamental change, his platform of hope and change was built on? But then he believes that no body can build anything without government first building the roadway and bridge to no where. Which is where the government seem to be pushing Christians and their religious beliefs towards.

We have come to a point of not being able to trust him ( Obama ) and the judgments he is making on our behalf. Net alow his word. He is as it seem to be, a first third world president of the United States of America. Concerned more with being a compromise-er with an overly friendly nature towards everyone else in the world. He compromises his presented moral standings, or what faith he claims for the moment. No matter what intent he may have. He has failed to understand the Islāmic faith vs Christianity.

To govern this nation you have to leave your personal beliefs at the front door of the office. There is no room for expressing personal beliefs, without giving the impression of governmental support of them. Without offending still other beliefs and believers. Therefore no need to insult this nations over whelming belief in Christian values. All the while over looking the almost daily threats from the Islamist extremest, towards every religion in opposition to their own beliefs.

Like supper man he ( Mr. Obama ) fly’s around the wold chastising behaviours for something that rubs him wrong. Apologizing still to others for something he didn’t create, and then coming home he criticizing for all the intolerance he sees, while pushing the immoral political correctness.

Obama is not just the first black president. But the first third world president. Who, when ever he steps out on the world stage seems to have forgotten where he has come from, and where he is going. Claiming to be christian. But forgetting his muslim up bringing. Offending one, while apologizing still for the others offence. In so doing Obama has lost personal popularity, as well as American popularity, among the Islamists of the world. Not to mention the respect as well.

By his display of weakness, he has lost every kind of popularity and respect, faster than Gorge Bush did. Even faster still among the world of Islam. Because they despise weakness, and are all to willing to exploit it.

Despite the God-given right of the FIRST AMENDMENT. Along with the superior moral values within the constitution of the United States of America. These documents given all of us the same abilities, to the same kind of free speech as anyone else in this country.

Obama uses his own moral judgments to engage within negotiations along with Islāmic nations. Using the United Nations ( UN ) counsel of human rights in trying to curb our ( USA”s ) freedom of free speech. By limiting what we can say or even criticise, with regards to Islam. Without even asking for the same kind of compromise and controlled speech of the muslim nations, and what they say towards other religions. Clearly Obama doesn’t see the real differences between Islam and every other religion. Islam feels that their God is more powerful than Christianity’s perceptions of who, and what God is, or is like.

Did he fail to lessen to the president of Egypt when he said.

” The Quartan is the constitution! The prophet is our leader! Jihad is our path! Death in the name Islam is our goal! “

or at different times other Islāmic leaders said.

” We love death more than you love life!”

Despite all of this Obama said in an apologetic way.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” Obama at the UN

Liberals have attacked conservatives and constrictive minded Christians. With self blinding cliché’s of some self-proclaimed superior emotional ideas. A progressive moral code. using political correctness as the weapon of choice. Showing us all, that they are nothing but old musicians of the past. Trying desperately to hang onto lost fame of the past. With their past memories still fresh in their minds performing their one hit wonders, to what now is only an empty arena of intellectual ideas. along with a child-like attitude. They paint unrealistic dreams of their fathers lost glory. Like a pot smoker under the influence. They weave yarns of smoke into the foundational fabric of their socialist utopia. Marching forward, towards their social engineering of their choosing.

These disciples of destruction Believe they, and they alone deserve to be in the rightful place of leadership. They try to negotiate with the Islamist world what would be acceptable as what is and is not free speech. Despite the first amendment. They subjugate Christian values and morals as being ones of a lesser importance in comparison to muslim values. Yet say nothing when women’s rights are violated, when Christians are being killed, persecuted, or thrown out of Islāmic country’s. We say nothing when muslims arm themself’s, and attack with suicide bombers. Attacking women and children because they happen to be jewish. Or other people who express beliefs in opposition to Islam or Sharia. We say and do nothing when Islamist leaders call for genocide to be preformed against Israel. Yet we fool ourself’s into believing that progressive values are far superior. Rather then recognising progressive morals as being socially suicidal in nature.

When will we admit to our self, then to the world. That any religion that also promotes violence, engages in violence, and teaches hate of others because they dare to believe differently, and then acts out with violence on that teaching, as being a false religion!?

Why can we not express to those false teachers. That their kind of religious teachings do deserve a future that is comfortable with ours? Nor should the future belong to those who slander, using hate of Christian / Jewish / and other religious values. When will any American leader stand up and deliver a speech using terms as forcefully as possible explaining our values of being a Christian nation, as one who has a GOD given powerful right of free speech? So put a sock in it!!

When have we seen or heard. “The future must not belong to those who slander the tenets of Christianity! ” ?

Yet the news if full of stories of rioting against innocent people trapped in poverty, unable to escape the insanity of religious persecution. By a religion that has turned its back on free choice, and replaced it with an over abundance of fear, violence, manipulation, distortion, lies and lairs. Who promise any of the would be suicide bombers with a fantasy of 72 virgins, as their 30 pieces of silver.

When will we accept that Islam doesn’t want peace, they want victory!!! A one world religion governed by Sharia law! A heaven built of men, not of GOD!

When will our leaders get it? We don’t want ignorance bottled up in righteousness. The chronic political correctness, which leads to an accommodationist style and type of leadership. A compromise-er! An alternate reality where Christianity isn’t worth defending. Out of some misguided guilt, willing to embrace Islāmic seeds of destruction. In exchanged for bucket loads of money, constantly shoveled into the middle east in an attempt to pay the devil in buying our way to heaven. these acts of misguided charity clothed in misguided support of human rights. Is the self-deception, the false religion of where everyone will go along, to get along. In the end forgetting that true principles and morals are timeless.

We ( As a nation and more importantly our government. ) must see what our enemy’s have been all to willing to tell us openly. The who, and what they are, as well as what they intend to do. Only then we will be able to defend ourself’s if it need be. With the appropriate amount of force. Therefore understanding Islam and their religious extremism within the muslim off shoots that exist today. Not as a religion, but as a religious command and control theocracy, bent on world domination. One compelled mind at a time.

” It requires to correctly identify your enemy’s and what they intend to do. But in your arrogance you believe that you write the script, but you don’t!! “ Lara Logan.

This guy explains these differences without mixing word: http://youtu.be/GCXHPKhRCVg

Arrogance will blind you from seeing what is so openly in your face. The future must not belong to those who slander common sence, and refuses to see the alternate reality of political correctness. Religious ones or other wise.