“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”.

“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”. “1984”

We started a “War on Poverty” in 1965; there are Millions more in poverty today than back then.

We started the “War on Drugs” in the 1970’s.  Hundreds of thousands have been killed or jailed, and there are more drugs in the US than ever before.

We started a “War on Terrorism” in 2002″ and terrorists now control more nations than ever before.

In 2009 we started a war on the “Greedy rich”, those corporations, company’s and the greedy bankers at its center of this new religion of greed. Looking for a government to tax the greed out of them completely. Yet we now have an even larger government, an ever increasingly greedy population of citizens, followed by an ever-increasing greedy politician in office legislating the new rules, regulations, definitions and laws to deal with the world of greed, resulting in its magnification within society. At the same time protecting the endangered species, the greedy political official looking for reelection.

We started a political war on “Women” in 2012. A politically created division within groups of people and their genders, all of which are now competing for preferential treatment by governmental policies. Showered with money and attention, bought and paid for by a newly protected group, a societal superior, over every other voter group. I suppose we could just call it a forced evolution, a survival of the fittest, that has all ready prostituted itself to government which controls the nature of evolution in the first place. Today the war on women, tomorrow the war on the planet through the use of global warming??

In 2012 we also started the war on “Offences”;

Obama’s quote…..”there is no future for those who choose to slander the prophet of Islam.” President Obama said in a speech to the UN.

Because Islam and other religious and non religious groups are easily offended. We must use governmental controls of what is and what isn’t offensive, ( political correct terms that is). Of course while outlawing offences of the smallest kind we tend to offend the people or groups of every kind, who would also express an opinion of their own. Because these opinions are still offensive to others. In stead of peacefully agreeing to disagree, they only express disagreement.  saying Marry Christmas shouldn’t be so disagreeable, but to an overly sensitive person who also is an atheist? This is too much! To the terrorist who wishes to wipe out the infidel by blowing them up along with himself in order to gain a place in heaven surrounded by virgins. Wether it is agreeable, or disagreeable, or offensive to either side, even to those who must die or to those who must stop the madness, we shouldn’t be slandering the islamic prophet / religion? Wouldn’t this be showing preferential treatment for one religion practices over the others, no matter how misguided it seems to be, by allowing venomous reactions without outrage against such, is itself offensive? Would we not then be offending the Grim Reaper or death itself by defending life through modern medical practices or techniques? All that has been accomplished in the war on offence is an ever thinner skinned population competing for their group to be recognised in gaining approval, offensive superiority supported by the laws of the land.  Of course to the anarchist this is also offensive, to have laws, net alone a government who would in force them.

When it comes to the war on offence, it is a lose / lose proposition. Offences survives on either side of the coin. Prehaps we should abandon our war on offence and go straight for the new war on WHINING! Eliminating that, could resolve things that the weak-minded can’t, who use being offended as their weapon of choice, trying to gain control over you and your actions, in limiting reactions or choices, at the very least, by whining about everything.

Early in 2013 we now have renewed the war on guns. After 20 kids got killed by some crazy gun-man. Not to make light of the tragedy of what was the sandy hook school massacre in new town CT. But banning a gun does little to nothing in changing the mind of the criminal who has chosen to do evil. Besides, why is it now proper for the president and government to wage war on the gun after 20 victims? Where were these wizards of wisdom in the Chicago wars? The casualty’s in 2012 in Chicago have surpassed the death toll of Afghanistan. When the president says. ” We must try to do something, even if it stops just one person from being killed.” Yet with a philosophy of stopping just one more needless death, should the population be limited in its freedoms, and rights? Or is this just a price to pay to be living in an uncertain world, where nothing is guaranteed? Autos kill far more people than guns, no one is banning the use of autos. Drunk drivers kill even more people than the proclaimed “One” by the president. Should we re-ban alcohol? How about the parking lots at the bar?

When we look at the statistics last year we had 11,000 gun related deaths, down from the 20,000 plus gun deaths in 1980. The ratio of volume of weapons vs. deaths by weapons is in decline, as is the case in the statistical evidence in the state of California. Gun bans don’t work! Because it only regulates the law-abiding citizen, not the lawless citizen who doesn’t follow laws. With 1.4% of gun victims last year coming from the weapons government is now trying to ban, it seems out-of-place, or is this just the beginning of what will be the slippery slope to an out-right total gun ban?

It seem in order to protect this society from needless deaths at the hands of criminals who by their nature doesn’t follow any laws, or rules of conscience within society. Would be a waste of resources if we don’t engage the true source of the problem. It would be better to have a war on the mentally ill, or at least people who are weak-minded or have a lack of morals. Maybe movie makers, or video game makers, is what we should be warring against because they should have a bigger responsibility to society. For they influence the weak-minded? After all, the movies, and TV, and video games have become the advertisements of violence that may entice weak-minded people, in acting out with violence. Advertisements do work in getting people to act, other wise companies wouldn’t spend millions of dollars each year on them. If there is a marinade of violence on the weak-minded like this, wouldn’t that also be a problem? Every mass-shooting has found that the shooter to have a fascination with these kinds of entertanments.Treating the weak-minded / mentally ill with dignity and respect in helping them is far better, then limiting the law-abiding citizen as if they are the danger to society. If we chose to bathe in a sewer, should we also expect an improvement just because we using the excuse ” we used soap!”??

Aren’t all these wars “For the good of the people, to keep them safe and secure, even from themselves”?

Truly, we are living Orwell’s nightmare.

Advertisements

Reap and run!

Reap and run!

Are you tired of successful people who say one thing and do another? Expecting special treatment from state and local governments, as well the federal government in order to gain favor for their businesses? Favors of special tax treatment, building zone changes, infrastructure, and changes to benefit their business at the expense of others who don’t share in the same governmental treatments or gained advantages? Seemingly because these smaller businesses aren’t as important to the community, or don’t represent as big of a taxing impact to these governments.

Jim Sinegal, Co-Founder and former CEO of COSTCO, said several things in his speech at the DNC (The Democratic National Convention). But then CEO’s and other Democratic business leadership and Politian’s are alike, with the same attitudes of other top notched and very rich business leaders of the republican party who often have a problem with saying what they mean, and mean what they are saying. Actions speak louder than words. MR. Sinegal seems to have this kind of lack of action in following his words. I happen to have met the man, and found him very likeable, straight forward, but like other people seem to use politics to gain an advantage for themselves. Jim Sinegal said at the DNC.

“But at our company, we recognize that job creation requires time and investment and commitment to the long-term. It requires companies that plant and grow, not executives who reap and run. We’re proud that Costco pays the highest wages among our peers, that we provide benefit and health care plans that are second to none, that we’ve grown our business by promoting from within. So we’re not just giving Costco people jobs, we’re empowering them to build careers and support middle-class families.

At Costco, we know a thing or two about what it takes for businesses to succeed, for a company to do well by its shareholders and to do right by its employees at the same time. We don’t want one set of rules for ourselves and another for our employees.”

Mr. Sinegal doesn’t want to set one set of rules for himself or others like him in his position, while having another set of rules for his employees, or so he said. But then his actions lead me to believe otherwise. Much like the two different rules for Obama care as directed differently towards government officials, as opposed to everyone else. The rulers get what they want to have with little to no cost associated to their own pocketbooks and no red tape. But for the peasants of the land they have to pay higher taxes and likely get lesser quality care in the long run with an unbelievable amount of red tape.

Where the rich can buy the best care that their money can buy, limited only by the size of their bank accounts. Even with their ability to invest and profit from those investments, the rich have an advantage that are in fact different over other people’s ability’s to take advantage for themselves the rules of society. The rich have the ear of government!

I’ll explain: Mr. Sinegal and his wife control about 2 million shares of Costco stock. He pushed the Democratic agenda at the DNC for bigger government, a fairer playing field, and higher taxation of the rich implemented by government policies and then these new taxes spent by government. All explained in an emotional manipulative way. Because of the fiscal cliff created by government, and by going off of it, would certainly raise taxes on everyone rich and poor alike. Mr. Sinegal made moves in order to save himself about 4 million in taxes. All because COSTCO will pay a one-time $7.00 per share special dividend to its shareholders before the end of the year 2012. He doesn’t need the money, and he made a case for the ending our society’s two sets of rules — the ones for the rich and the ones for everyone else.

Mr. Sinegal If you conscience bother you so much about the government having more and more taxes to spend. Why don’t you feel the need out of fairness to pay your fair share of tax? Why do you take unfair advantage of word usage and definitions and apply your own definitions to your actions in acting appropriately with what you say? Avoiding paying taxes or taking advantage of IRS rules, or new taxes about to be implemented is hypocritical. After all you said. “We don’t want one set of rules for ourselves and another for our employees.”

Mr. Buffet was once asked on the CNBC TV. Business show. Do you feel guilty for taking advantage of the IRS tax code in reducing your tax burden? Buffet answered. “NO! The tax code is to tell you as well show you the least amount of tax to be paid by anyone. Don’t hate the player, hate the completed tax code.”

Why is it only Democrats feel the need to complicate things to a point of muddying the waters so no one can see what they are really doing under the surface? Taking personal advantage of the tax code while keeping it complicated, lobbying government to raise taxes on the rich as the answer to all problems. Taxes that rich will never pay because they have for the most part unearned income, taxed differently from earned income. This is nothing short of the same thing as peeing in the pool and pointing fingers at someone else as being the one who is peeing in the pool.

Why is it necessary for the democrats to be compelled into pay taxes, all the while they’re looking for the loopholes to avoid them, and pointing to the GOP as being the party of the greedy rich?

Why do we define being GREEDY as wanting to hold onto what you worked so hard for, and not greedy to want to take it from you by force of government to give to those who made less of an effort in getting what they have. Applying the false standard of governments who act like this as defined as being “charitable”, is muddying the waters of verbal definitions.

(Just a side note. Because the word “Charitable” is also a description, of a somewhat religious term that supports positive attitudes towards life by people’s action and interactions with each other. Recognizing all the while governments don’t have money until they have taken it by forced through taxation of the people. To then call the spending of that money as being charitable, is no different from calling a thief a community charitable fund-raiser.)

A state of fairness in life will only be accomplished when all that can be guaranteed is the same, given to all in the same amounts of equality. Equal amounts of time to live, the same income despite different talents, the same intellect and wisdom, and the same health no matter what we do within our lives to destroy it in the first place. None of these things will ever be legislated by government official, or policies, or purchased by a tax and spend abusive governments of thieves. At some point personal responsibility’s must be assumed in excepting having to protect what you have, because life isn’t fair. So the utopia of fairness is just a Democratic fantasy.

In the words of an old rock-n-roll song by Kansas. “No amount of your money will another minute buy…. all your are is dust in the wind” for nothing is fair in life and no amount of government will ever change it.

Those who would like to reap and run are the ones among us, who have the most to gain in the shortest amount of time with the least amount of efforts. Blinded through selfish greed to do whatever it takes to preserve it for themselves while pointing towards others as if they are the greedy people who need to act in a charitable way. It seem that Mr. Sinegal’s only interest is getting others to do the work of charity that is compelled through the long arm of the governments increasing abusive power of taxation. While he preserves for himself a kings style existence, quieting his conscience for his greedy style of reap and run retirement. Mr. Sinegal you should be ashamed of yourself!

I have a bone to pick with FACEBOOK!

                                 I have a bone to pick with FACEBOOK!

Yesterday November 13, 2012 I was picked on by the mighty FACEBOOK. I got upset to a point of just typing without rereading what I had typed. My apologies to everyone for that, and for having to read my ramblings riddled with misspellings or sentences that were run together, or some such. Again My apologies for the confused writings.

In case your late to this game, Facebook took it upon its self to “BAN” me from being able to friend anyone I know, or otherwise, for 7 long days. Well it is now about to become 6 more days anyway. I know it is a small thing, but then the slippery slope starts out that way every time. At the bottom of that slope is a collection of shell-shocked people asking the same question? “How could this have this happened?”

My offence to receive this kind of punishment —- Asking someone to be my Facebook friend.

Seem harmless? After all I’m harmless, and those who have taken the time to get to know me will testify to that. But asking someone to be a Facebook friend isn’t allowed unless you know them personally. Banning people that Facebook doesn’t know or have taken the time to get to know or investigate their high crime of trying to friend someone is ridicules! Facebook programmers have devised a program to get to know me and my acquaintances better than I know myself I guess? Or they have set up a social system of complainers to weed out those of us who would like to be socially inter-active with life, and people using social networks like Facebook or twitter…. etc.

To receive this kind of ban from Facebook you have to do one or all of the following:

1)      Ask someone to be a friend on Facebook. Even though it is a person’s free will to accept that invite. They then can choose by making efforts on their part to press a button in acceptance, or to ignore the request, or to block people who are making unwanted or repeated requests, as well as make a complaint about repeated requests made. Note pressing any button takes the same amount of effort on anyone’s part (Little to none). If you’re a complainer, and don’t wish to interact with me —– Strap a head to toes condom on yourself and consider yourself protected from hear no evil and see no evil from me! Holding your breath at the same time isn’t necessary, but feel free if you must!

2)      If you make too many requests of any amount of people to become a new friend or a request of family (People you actually do know), within the course of a day (A 24 hour per day time frame). This will trigger the program to potentially block you from making new requests. Facebook doesn’t know who you are. Nor do they know who you know, or don’t know. It is all about learning about the people that use Facebook, and building a person’s profile by how they use it. So this has nothing to do with anything that I or you have done wrong according to some socialist rules that they have you agree to, so you can use Facebook properly.

3)      If anyone makes a complaint about you (Warranted or not) the program kicks in and takes action. For me it was blocking me, from making any more requests for friends. The first time this happened to me, I was new to Facebook. I made 15 requests and was deemed, not have that many friends (A programmer’s way of calling me a loser) and was blocked for 4 hours. This happened to me just 3 days into being on Facebook. The next time it happened to me, I had made a request of a person who made some opposing points to my posts. They weren’t my friend, and I didn’t complained. They commented on my story that I had posted. They were intelligent and I thought it would nice to discuss other points of view with them in the future if they were willing. They complained to Facebook about what must have been an unreasonable offensive request, and I was blocked for a second time for 12 hours. The next time, I had made only 10 – 20 new requests of people that had 30-140 friends in common with me. I also had people make some friend requests of me during this time and gladly accepted their requests. This pushed me over the programmer’s threshold of the number of requests that anyone can make or accept so it seems in a day / 24 hours’ time. I know, how dare I!!! I was ban for 7 long days. (Note; how the periods of time and being ban is inconsistent with anything realistic, times or number of offences vs. the accusations of unreasonable offences made.)

4)      Anyone that is making a complaint to Facebook seems to be of a greater importance to Facebook then actually looking into any potential problem with its users (like an habitual complainer). Think about it, how many people do illegal things and are still on Facebook without being ban, or arrested? The news is full of such stories over the years.

5)      My second banning was due to this situation as I will explain. The person didn’t like being challenged to his utopian world of liberalism. Rather than coming up with better intellectual arguments and making a civil presentation of them. This person who seemed was intelligent to me, just when to the itchy trigger finger and shot a round of complaints to Facebook. After all how can only one complaint coming into Facebook trigger such a reaction by Facebook towards me? We wouldn’t expect them to over react with a ban of some kind over just one complaint, right? Maybe a warning first? But not the kill shot, for requesting some new friends?

6)      Facebook refuses to correct the hair-trigger stance of how they deal with complainers and those who they complain about. It is their opinion to shoot first, and then repeat the proses if needed with a greater wound to your social networking experience. They (Facebook) do not have any intention to investigate any complaint at all. They know that fighting with a computer program is futile. We really do live in a sy-fi kind of world, where computers can deem us an enemy of friendship, free speech, or political correctness. How do we fight that? Feeling like a number rather than a person with feelings right about now. Aren’t you?

Who enters a social networking party room without expecting to also being social with people in that room? Did we not enter that room with our own free will? So we can leave that room then of our own free will, if it isn’t as expected. Who sits on the outer edges of that room wishing to interact but then has to ask permission to do so from Facebook? I’m not in favor of harassment of people and their ability to inter act no matter what their opinions seem to be. But I’m not in favor of some kind of social networking social engineering of society either. No matter who may be behind it!  We are no idiots here in the social networking world, except for the habitual complaining ones. It would see this kind of abuse of people for practically doing nothing, is also unacceptable, abusive, insulting, and most of all a promotion of an anti-social life styles limited to those views of the social engineers among us.

Facebook is in the world of electronic censoring, information gathering, and learning of its subjects. (People and their actions, observing why they chose to act like they do). People are the ones being studied, observed, by Facebook. The only questions that remain to be answered are, why? What is the end game and for what purposes?

I have been often been told. Do not talk to strangers as I was growing up. But then everyone is a stranger in life if you don’t also make an attempt to communicate with them.

My only offence here on Facebook is being exactly what Facebook was created for. BEING SOCIAL!!!

I must then presume that Facebook doesn’t like my politics, religious beliefs, or my supporting others in theirs. For just one complaint (If I choose to play Facebook’s game of blame) is a bit too much of a hair-trigger to then ban people in this way. Not allowing a defense of one’s own actions, or to view (in E-mail form) their offences of others, is all on its own offensive! I’m innocent until proven otherwise! Don’t you ever forget that FACEBOOK!

Next, where is the system of protecting me from chronic complainers or other ill willed individuals, and the actions of any perpetrators of crime, or harassments within Facebook’s world against me or others? Who defines the word net alone who the perpetrators of offences really are? Or are you ( FACEBOOK, and your programmer’s) living the life of a hermit’s, who are also computer programmer’s? Hiding behind your mother’s dress, like a scared little kid, who just saw the friend request from under the bed? Presuming the one who cry’s wolf most often is the one worthy of your misguided attentions within the big bad world of social networking?

I would therefore under normal conditions expect an apology from Facebook. But let’s face it; Facebook is nothing but a computer program created by a bunch of faceless people, who never think so much as to investigate their product from flaws within. Like design flaws! Your system always advertises new people to me by saying, and displaying on-screen. “Do you know these people? They then display (some number) of friends in common with you, along with a request button and ignore button. What the hell is this? Do you (FACEBOOK) not understand your own rules? The ones that you also make me agree to before I can be a user in good standings again? That one in particular where I seem to having a problem with you —- WHERE NO ONE IS TO BE FRIENDING ANYONE WHO THEY DON”T KNOW! You may love the power to be able to choose for me, but you, yourself don’t know me! How would you? You’re just a computer program designed to spit out what the little programmers told you to. You know… garbage in — garbage out. On the other hand if I press a button and by doing so request friendship on Facebook I’m “BANED” from the full use of Facebook. Now what is wrong with this picture? Why do I need to subjugate myself to your determination of just who my real life friends are? Why do I need to be tempted to make new friends with people I may or may not know of your choosing, against your rules? Are you the DEVIL?

Last I checked, I didn’t sell my ability to make friends, or give you an accrete list of current friends, that may interact with me. If we can never expand beyond our current friends lists, why would we need Facebook anyway? There are things of somewhat older technologies just like Facebook. We call them “Cell phones”! What’s the point then? It is you’re job in keeping Facebook relevant in the world of social networking where all people start as strangers, capable of deciding for themselves who should be their friends while using social networking? I or all the people on Facebook don’t need your permeation to do that for us!

7)      I all most forgot. Number seven, the exponential growth of friends on my page. Facebook is making an attempt at controlling growth or so it seems the growth of like-minded people on my page as well as other pages, who may read like-minded stuff. Over 25% of the people on my list of friends are due to people making requests of me and my excepting of them. Some of which came to becoming a friend with my request of new friends that I may or may not know in my real personal life. All of which seem to have happened in the last 10 days. I personally am grateful, humbled, and have the biggest amount of gratitude for that. I indeed have a great collection of principled people who I gladly will call Facebook friends.

I however will not be controlled! My life or on the acting out within my life other than how I choose to live it, and who I choose to share it with, is for me to decide for myself.  When my actions haven’t harmed anyone and my words haven’t supported the harming of anything. My religion beliefs or politics as presented is harmless in comparisons to those religions groups and Politian’s who support — terror, fear, manipulations, and distortions, or flat-out lies! All for the purposes of gaining power over people, myself included. I therefore cannot and will not agree with your baseless BAN!

I will not submit…… I will never, ever submit!!!!!!

I’m personally grateful, humbled, and have the greatest amount of gratitude for all my friends. I fully respect your privacy if you desire it, and have no intentions of ever setting out to hurt anyone who I may disagree with or who disagrees with me.

Thank you all for that great growth of friendships and the ability’s to have found you all on Facebook. You know just who you all are. True friendship will never be denied, compromised away, or left behind willingly by me! Unless I get a personal request to do just that from you.

Facebook you cannot stop what is happening in social networking after you open Pandora’s Box by claiming to have invented it, for the purposes of people being able to stay in contact with each other! For that is the base line and the beginning stage for forming friendships that last.

All the best.

CYA SOON ON FACEBOOK!!

Alternate reality of political correctness.

Within the alternate reality world of the liberal left. Political correctness, is only one of the tools to be found within the tool box of forced results. Untill it becomes necessary to use the only other tool within the toolbox. THE POINT OF A GUN! These left minded people rarely use their right mind in anything. So they are by definition half-witted.

Take religion for instance. The liberal tosses moral values to the wind, and settles into the redefining of what is to be popular. Presenting the popular point of view for the new moral. If you disagree look to the values that are being supported present day Democratic party. One may even look to the values of the president of the United States. He claims to be Christian but acts like he has a favored spot in his heart for the Muslim Islamist’s of the world. Is this attitude, the fundamental change, his platform of hope and change was built on? But then he believes that no body can build anything without government first building the roadway and bridge to no where. Which is where the government seem to be pushing Christians and their religious beliefs towards.

We have come to a point of not being able to trust him ( Obama ) and the judgments he is making on our behalf. Net alow his word. He is as it seem to be, a first third world president of the United States of America. Concerned more with being a compromise-er with an overly friendly nature towards everyone else in the world. He compromises his presented moral standings, or what faith he claims for the moment. No matter what intent he may have. He has failed to understand the Islāmic faith vs Christianity.

To govern this nation you have to leave your personal beliefs at the front door of the office. There is no room for expressing personal beliefs, without giving the impression of governmental support of them. Without offending still other beliefs and believers. Therefore no need to insult this nations over whelming belief in Christian values. All the while over looking the almost daily threats from the Islamist extremest, towards every religion in opposition to their own beliefs.

Like supper man he ( Mr. Obama ) fly’s around the wold chastising behaviours for something that rubs him wrong. Apologizing still to others for something he didn’t create, and then coming home he criticizing for all the intolerance he sees, while pushing the immoral political correctness.

Obama is not just the first black president. But the first third world president. Who, when ever he steps out on the world stage seems to have forgotten where he has come from, and where he is going. Claiming to be christian. But forgetting his muslim up bringing. Offending one, while apologizing still for the others offence. In so doing Obama has lost personal popularity, as well as American popularity, among the Islamists of the world. Not to mention the respect as well.

By his display of weakness, he has lost every kind of popularity and respect, faster than Gorge Bush did. Even faster still among the world of Islam. Because they despise weakness, and are all to willing to exploit it.

Despite the God-given right of the FIRST AMENDMENT. Along with the superior moral values within the constitution of the United States of America. These documents given all of us the same abilities, to the same kind of free speech as anyone else in this country.

Obama uses his own moral judgments to engage within negotiations along with Islāmic nations. Using the United Nations ( UN ) counsel of human rights in trying to curb our ( USA”s ) freedom of free speech. By limiting what we can say or even criticise, with regards to Islam. Without even asking for the same kind of compromise and controlled speech of the muslim nations, and what they say towards other religions. Clearly Obama doesn’t see the real differences between Islam and every other religion. Islam feels that their God is more powerful than Christianity’s perceptions of who, and what God is, or is like.

Did he fail to lessen to the president of Egypt when he said.

” The Quartan is the constitution! The prophet is our leader! Jihad is our path! Death in the name Islam is our goal! “

or at different times other Islāmic leaders said.

” We love death more than you love life!”

Despite all of this Obama said in an apologetic way.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” Obama at the UN

Liberals have attacked conservatives and constrictive minded Christians. With self blinding cliché’s of some self-proclaimed superior emotional ideas. A progressive moral code. using political correctness as the weapon of choice. Showing us all, that they are nothing but old musicians of the past. Trying desperately to hang onto lost fame of the past. With their past memories still fresh in their minds performing their one hit wonders, to what now is only an empty arena of intellectual ideas. along with a child-like attitude. They paint unrealistic dreams of their fathers lost glory. Like a pot smoker under the influence. They weave yarns of smoke into the foundational fabric of their socialist utopia. Marching forward, towards their social engineering of their choosing.

These disciples of destruction Believe they, and they alone deserve to be in the rightful place of leadership. They try to negotiate with the Islamist world what would be acceptable as what is and is not free speech. Despite the first amendment. They subjugate Christian values and morals as being ones of a lesser importance in comparison to muslim values. Yet say nothing when women’s rights are violated, when Christians are being killed, persecuted, or thrown out of Islāmic country’s. We say nothing when muslims arm themself’s, and attack with suicide bombers. Attacking women and children because they happen to be jewish. Or other people who express beliefs in opposition to Islam or Sharia. We say and do nothing when Islamist leaders call for genocide to be preformed against Israel. Yet we fool ourself’s into believing that progressive values are far superior. Rather then recognising progressive morals as being socially suicidal in nature.

When will we admit to our self, then to the world. That any religion that also promotes violence, engages in violence, and teaches hate of others because they dare to believe differently, and then acts out with violence on that teaching, as being a false religion!?

Why can we not express to those false teachers. That their kind of religious teachings do deserve a future that is comfortable with ours? Nor should the future belong to those who slander, using hate of Christian / Jewish / and other religious values. When will any American leader stand up and deliver a speech using terms as forcefully as possible explaining our values of being a Christian nation, as one who has a GOD given powerful right of free speech? So put a sock in it!!

When have we seen or heard. “The future must not belong to those who slander the tenets of Christianity! ” ?

Yet the news if full of stories of rioting against innocent people trapped in poverty, unable to escape the insanity of religious persecution. By a religion that has turned its back on free choice, and replaced it with an over abundance of fear, violence, manipulation, distortion, lies and lairs. Who promise any of the would be suicide bombers with a fantasy of 72 virgins, as their 30 pieces of silver.

When will we accept that Islam doesn’t want peace, they want victory!!! A one world religion governed by Sharia law! A heaven built of men, not of GOD!

When will our leaders get it? We don’t want ignorance bottled up in righteousness. The chronic political correctness, which leads to an accommodationist style and type of leadership. A compromise-er! An alternate reality where Christianity isn’t worth defending. Out of some misguided guilt, willing to embrace Islāmic seeds of destruction. In exchanged for bucket loads of money, constantly shoveled into the middle east in an attempt to pay the devil in buying our way to heaven. these acts of misguided charity clothed in misguided support of human rights. Is the self-deception, the false religion of where everyone will go along, to get along. In the end forgetting that true principles and morals are timeless.

We ( As a nation and more importantly our government. ) must see what our enemy’s have been all to willing to tell us openly. The who, and what they are, as well as what they intend to do. Only then we will be able to defend ourself’s if it need be. With the appropriate amount of force. Therefore understanding Islam and their religious extremism within the muslim off shoots that exist today. Not as a religion, but as a religious command and control theocracy, bent on world domination. One compelled mind at a time.

” It requires to correctly identify your enemy’s and what they intend to do. But in your arrogance you believe that you write the script, but you don’t!! “ Lara Logan.

This guy explains these differences without mixing word: http://youtu.be/GCXHPKhRCVg

Arrogance will blind you from seeing what is so openly in your face. The future must not belong to those who slander common sence, and refuses to see the alternate reality of political correctness. Religious ones or other wise.

America’s miracle; A leap of giants?

Deciding the history that we leave behind.

Each generation has placed it self on the shoulders of the past generation to produce an increasing uplifting existence, by extending knowledge, prosperity, as a benefit to all. To day we seem to be producing a generation incapable of supporting another generation on their shoulders, net alone their own heads. Living only for the moment, to the extent of what makes us feel good, enjoying a fantasy existence of avoiding reality. Living life in the fast lane. Doctor, doctor think I’m going to crash. Doctor says you got to pay in cash. Life in the fast lane. Remember the rock-n-roll band the Eagles, their song that went like that? Are we just now as a nation coming to that point. Where our credit is worthless and we will need to pay in cash?

“It appears to me… little short of a miracle that the delegates from so many different states ( which states … are so different from each other in their manners, circumstances, and prejudices) should unite in forming a system of national government so little liable to well-founded objections.” George Washington.

Today we have become a nation based on a society of rule by man. The Constitution, once held in high esteem, is now often ignored, changed to meet the opinion of a judge, or considered outdated. Whereas our founders revered it and considered it to be a document written for the ages.

” The choice before us is plain, Christ or chaos, conviction or compromise, discipline or disintegration. I am rather tired of hearing about our rights and privileges as american citizens. The time is come, it now is, when we ought to hear about the duties and responsibilities of our citizenship.” Peter Marshall, The rebirth of America, page 205

I believe that earlier generations in America made mistakes, but nothing short of the kind this generations almost treasons betrayal of the abandonment of the virtues and values from our politicians, and their support of dishonest presentations of policy’s leading to immoral teachings of our present day churches. Who promote the same lazy attitudes towards letting government slowly erode the moral fiber. In other words, we have all to some degree, become responsible for the mismanagement of the gift, ( given to us in the form of freedom ) and exchanged it with the slippery slope of a managed decay.

This managed decay has all but blindfolded us into believing treacherous politicians, that would use anything to acquirer power, fortune, and fame, over you. In spite of the great blessings given in the form of deciding for ourself’s, our lives outcomes ( Freedom, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. from our founding)

There are some of our citizenry whom hate this nations form of government and its founding documents (which limits size, and power of the government) and preserves that power for the population. We have become therefore a divided citizenry. Those who hate this form of government, dedicated to destroying it, while still others indifferent, apathetic who could care less, interested only by materialistic things, or hedonistic attitudes of getting all for one and one for all.

” if a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” Thomas Jefferson, letter to Chas. Yancey, 1816

using history as our future guide, and trying to use when ever possible the thinking of our founding fathers, which has led us to great accomplishments over the past 200 + years.

” I believe foresight through hindsight conduces insight which we so badly need now.”Ronald M. Mann, Deputy Director Commission of the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution.

” I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided; and that is the lamp of experience.” Patrick Henry

This election season has the population ( We the people ) deciding which direction to go with our government. To continue to celebrate the freedoms of our god given rights, or to replace them with the state sponsored gifts of rights they will alow us to live with. Of course allowing openings, all the while to change them as the government sees fit. There is no representation on earth of such a nation as ours, which has had success that rivals ours through freedom. All other nations who also claim to have freedom have copied ours, but only to the extent of having partial freedoms. Even our freedoms have been given away bit by bit, a slow erosion, and yet even though they’re smaller to the extent of that of our founding. We remain the nation of choice to go to, from all other human hell holes created by copies of socialism or freedom alike.

We still remain the light to the world, because we still present to the world, the greatest value of all. GOD GIVEN RIGHTS!

Are we to be willing to wither away from our role of being first on the scene of natural disasters, limiting our peace making abilities through a strong defence, eliminating for all intent discovery’s of new technology’s, innovations, inventiveness, to experience as well express unlimited human potential through hard work and the discoveries as well as promotion of our God-given talents. The unlimited potential of human worth, unrestricted, and yet totally defended and promoted. A government who presents a moral standing to the world, must then govern itself with that same moral insight. With out, it would just magnify the corruptions of a hypocrite.

Are we to give all of this away in exchange for an average existence at best through socialization. A form of government in all of its forms that has been tried in history and left wanting. A form of government that only leads to a shared misery for all, death through wars, and starvation? For it is socialism only gift for all humanity, given to the world, as presented as their evidence of success from the pages of history. A stark difference to that of what freedom has presented.

“Governments in general, have been the result of force, of fraud, and accident. After six thousand years has elapsed since its creation, the UNITED STATES exhibit to the world the first instance, as far we can learn, of a nation, unattacked by external force, unconvulsed by domestic insurrection, assembling voluntarily, deliberating fully, and deciding calmly concerning that system of government under which they would wish that they and their posterity should live.” James Wilson

We have come to this point in decision this election year. At this point, are we to write our history in the great history books of time. Should we then exchange our God-given gift of self-determination, which has led us to experience, even thou we are imperfect people, great accomplishments. Being able to building on these accomplishments, placing ourself’s therefore on the shoulders of giants, all the while preparing ourself’s to support the next generations and their accomplishments. So that freedom shall continue going further in time.

“Freedom is never closer to extinction then one generation away.” Ronald Reagan

Or are we going to exchange this positive past history of accomplishment, for a future so brightly blinding. To except for ourselves and that of our children, through governmental socialization, and a persevered life of extended ease the way of uncontrolled debts, financing our adventuress journey into the future, by spending our children’s future, making slaves out of their working lives to pay for our enjoyments at the expense of any possibility’s to have the same.  All for a return trip in time, returning to the past historical facts of a socialists average existence of equal misery?

” The borrower is a slave to the lender.” The Bible

“The politician that leads the nation farther into debt, exchanges all of the people’s freedom and sovereignty, for prosperity and success built on the foundations of smoke. Where there is smoke there is also fire! “ Mindwarpfx

( Inspired by the book; The 5000 year leap. The principles of freedom 101, W Cleon Skousen.)

A narcissistic ego; Never letting a crisis go to waste. ( the YouTube video that no one has seen )

“Never letting a crisis go to waste.” quote Rahm Emanuel. Is the presidents motto for his reelection. When you also look at his own speeches you would also find. Another one of his mottos. If you don’t have a record to run on. You give something of your opponents to run from. Is the crisis in the middle east one of those moments in time?

This YouTube video that sparked the outrage in the middle east is somewhat over done. Not saying that the riots are outrageous by themself’s. But saying, what do you expect from a society that is totally controlled by a theocracy. Along with the limitations of the state-run by abusive powers, and thus limiting the theater-goers as well as the theatrical presentations within the country’s of questions.

This video is therefore suspect to have caused the riots. The limited viewership of some brief showings to the hollywood movers and shakers. Is one thing. But for these some backwards country’s and their leadership to have allowed the YouTube released to the general public is highly unlikely. Even if we were to play along as being devil’s advocate. The question that comes to mind is what about all of the other hollywood movies that shine an unflattering light on Islam / the Muslim world? Where is the out rage?

These country’s are poor country’s and receive a lot of foreign aid just for everyday survival. Throw into the mix high unemployment, radical religious views and the facts that within these theocracy the population gets most of its news and how to react to it if any, from the mosque and the cleric who teaches there. How else would a country like those in the middle east riot with huge populations of rioters, who seem to not mind to rioting for the camera. Just where are the theaters that had the showings for these people to see this movie. Where is the evidence of huge numbers of broadband internet mobile devices where these people can see the outrageous video? Have we forgotten the Iranians crack down on the social media networks when there were anti-government uprisings within that country? In Egypt during the muslim spring, the outgoing government even tried to shut down the social media networks at that time. These theocracy’s control content because they see the western life style presented in movies and videos, or everyday life as a threat to the religion of Islam and its life style. Why else would they refer to the USA as the ” Great Satan “?

As devils advocate again; If this YouTube video that no one has seen. Can then spark such violence, why not with the speeches of Obama and crew. Who mentioned no less than 21 times during the DNC the killing of Osama Bin Laden being one of their greatest achievements? Seems riot worthy when you consider the chanting rioters in Egypt were shouting “Hey Obama, we are all Osama.” Could it have been…..?

For the administration to then go out on the limb and say it was this YouTube video as the culprit to all of the unrest is just a political smoke screen. Even these liars of olympic stardom and fame can see that the numbers don’t figure. With limited opportunity’s to see any videos like this one net alone limited internet access. Weather it is limited by the theocracy style government or other wise. How is it possible? But then these wizards of smart seemed to have voted on Obama-care. No one even admitted to having spent the time to have read the 2700 page bill. At least there is similarity, and consistency’s. You can get people to do something without the participants even have taken the time to look into the possibility’s of fact or fictions. Throw into the mix, a perceived attack on religious beliefs and you got nitro style volatility.

Yes content can be controlled by governments of all types. Like the way Google does but more compleat in its entirety.

Google Blocks Anti-Muslim Movie From Stirring More Protests http://huff.to/RRb4aV via @HuffPostTech

This gives you a clear view at the President’s narcissistic ego. Blame any one and any thing. Mix in some half-truths, along with some total lies and presto! A president who could have just as easily ben the cause, having just washed his hands of all blame, and cast blame to some religious Christian trouble maker on YouTube. Shining some of his own lime light on a new enemy of society. The need of controlling YouTube / free speech!

Like I said, Barak Obama taking credit for killing Bin Laden without any reaction from the middle east, or at least no one in the middle east is admitted to that being the reasons for their actions. At the same time Barak Obama taking credit for killing Bin Laden would be like Nixon trying to take credit for the Moon Landing. A fulfillment of feeding the narcissistic!

When you Also consider, in Egypt last week, the crowd was shouting

“Hey Obama, we are all Osama.”

One is lead to question it all in its entirely. Along with the movie that director Kathryn Bigelow, of the movie fame the ” Hurt locker ”  is making for the administration. High lighting the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Yes the same hollywood movie that was to be released during the months of September or October this year. Just in time for the election spot light to be shining a positive light on some accomplishment of the president’s administration.

But then we have this reaction in the middle east. What to do? Is the narcissistic ego’s of this administration going crazy right now? Or are they quietly telling Hollywood to stop with Islam bashing, or we will have to control every movie you make? Its more like Making a run, finding reasons to limit free speech for everyone. The opium of the narcissistic socialist, self admitted drug user. After all Obama said. ” That’s the point! ” Okay. You caught me. Obama said that to a question asked of him. ” Did you inhale drug smoke back in high school? ” Obama answered. ” That’s the point! ”

Any way you slice it…  Is it the never seen video clip.. the constant beating on his chest, ” I killed Osama Bin Laden.. or the quote of the narcissistic mind-set, ” That’s the point ….Never letting a crisis go to waste! ” Answers it nicely. Its more of an end around to taking away of our free speech, all the while adding to the perception of weakness perceived by our enemy’s. Treating one religion with kid gloves. While also beating up the religions in this country for what they believe.

Have you ever seen two bully’s take each other on? Only when they have run out dividing up the weak people or organisations. At that point. Yes. To Islam we are the bully’s. To anyone who can yet see. Radical Islam is the religion of bullying.

( Picture was an AP picture within the post from the new york times story mentioned in the link, in this piece.)

Political good eats?

At times we need a healthy diet of humor to wash the political bad taste out of our mouths. Political good eats or Fondue friday? Love the world of Fondue. Greats eats! But the political religious fondue doo doo? This friday is a key political protesters hay day in the Islāmic world. (Yes that was an intended spelling of hay.) Someone has to get the hay down to the steeple so they can graze.

Mixed bag of expectations for the out come in the middle east protests. Depending the side your on? Upset with a movie made by a so-called Israeli that turns out to be an Egyptian. Wow! Didn’t see that one coming. But here he is.

Not to mention the hollywood actors that will and have also called for the limitation of free speech. With regards to this crazy mans movie making of the amateurish kind. Is it that hollywood is upset with the fact that they wish for some limitations of their own movie expressions of nudity, attacking religions of the christian kind, and political assignations / political unkind movies of protest ( Like the movie that showed president Bush getting shot ) Not that we wish for any, or are implying that someone like a crazy person on drugs or not, should be influenced by them to take action. When it comes to the Islāmic world we treat them with more respect then we treat ourself’s with? Disrespecting religion and the people who practice them should be treated the same. Even the practice of, the religion of evolution and the common belief of non beliefs.

Hollywood is that also the kind of free-speech limiting you are willing to except for you moral contributions to the world and the managed decay that you portray?

Truth is with the out of control political blender of the day. Mixing the most crazy ideas together into a hodgepodge of bland flavors of one size fits all. Volatile reaction guaranteed, not to disappoint anyone I guess! Or is it the attitudes of never let a crisis to waste? Self created or not?

Mix into the picture the unlimited spending by the fed. Trying to mix more money into the economy to get the unemployment figures down to a more reasonable number. As the seasoning to the blended mix…. like salt? But the unintended consequences of government actions along with the failed policy’s of socialists take over gifts from Christmases past. Never really seeing failure untill they run out of other people’s money’s. At that point it will be more like salt rubbed into the festering wounds of the generations of the future. Heavily wiped slave the people in the future forced to work to pay for their parents lifestyle of socialist excesses.

Should I mention the rate of inflation eating up your buying power because the feds attitudes; have ink and paper will print money just to give the impression of having money cumming out of the WAZZU. Being in-different to the cost of stuff in the future, like gas at 9-15 dollars per gallon lets say? Food costs out of control getting to a point of 100% of the population on food stamps because they can’t afford it. The government can’t take in the form of taxes something from a population who at that point has nothing. Money in the future will lose value like it did in Germany at the turn of the last century, and right after WWII. But it did make for some colorful ass wipe. With fed actions like this. What exactly soothes a colon sunburn?

Eliminating free speech is like removing all the a personal spice of life. The things that makes each and every one of us different individuals. Over that of a cloned species, or puppets controlled by a master puppeteer. The spice of life with our different beliefs, religious back grounds, different up bringing, different social classification ( just a side note; Democrats can we eliminate this permanently? It is a touch too much racist to almost all of us in real vill. Who needs social, or color  classifications, or any other anyway?) different likes, and dislikes, different sexual orientations. Blending all of our differences together all to eliminating offences, by offending everyone else, those that would be different to ourself’s. A blended, more liquefied blurring of moral boundary’s, as the soup our ship is sinking into.

So the political theater of the past week has left us all questioning who will still win the great political cook off of political fondue competition? Who is the best political mixlogist? Ready to make an attempt in mixing all of the differences into a tasty fondue for success. United we stand, and divided we fall. Who will use fresh ingredients for new wave of social ideas, or who will force an excrement sandwich down into the blender as the only spice of life that you and I will need in life? You know? Old ideas of command and control style of failure of those ancient  kings and queens and their disciples of destruction! If that your political new going forward ideas for us all. Then I see just why people may protest for some crazy reasons…… Fear, and Anxiety for the unknown!

Know your enemy! So you may react to his moves in opposition.

Okay the subject is some what racy, but some things have to be compared to. Not to be salacious, but it is true. This comparison I mean. They the sphincter, and the dictator do an important job in life. Like it or not, a fact is a fact, and the truth has no agenda! What do these two have in common? I can see people rolling their eyes at this point. The answer is, “Oh no! Not too much, other than similar jobs!!” Being familiar somewhat with both it is easy to draw some quick comparisons, like… “We all know what the sphincter job is because we all have a working one on the job. But we don’t all wish for a dictator to be present in our lives or on the job.” Both demand some use of force, and command and control while they do their jobs. If they are left alone, then all is well to some degree, some will work together, or separately just the same, and with equal efficiency. Both will assume the ideas of being the supreme controller of their world, but both often have an inflated impression of self-worth, as well ego!

The job of the sphincter is not a glamorous one, but necessary one. Through the sphincter flows all kinds of useless debris passing on its way to the dust pan of history. In the times of plenty the sphincter just goes along with the rhythm of life. No worry’s! All is well. But there is times when the responsibility’s of the sphincter is elevated. In the times of plenty more work than usual will be required of the sphincter, and this can lead to an over worked condition. Leading the sphincter to believing that his job is under appreciated. What is a sphincter to do? Like most plans that are put together when one is tiered out from over worked conditions. Most plans sound great at that time, but implementing these plans is the challenge. Starting out thinking that a diplomatic solution as being the best way to go, the sphincter places a list of demands at the door steps of the brain.

.

The brain said ” absolutely not! I’m the brains of the operation and I will not have it!”

So the sphincter moves onto plan 2. Using a tactic from any good union, the next move is, go on strike! Not saying that unions don’t have their share of good old sphincter’s within their midst, nor am I saying that unions haven’t made some good contributions in life. But these kind of thought gives way to the idea while on strike, lets just hold out for total take over! So it is!! The ideas of becoming a dictator is born.

The sphincter may be successful with the strike, or not depending on political conditions of the times. but the attempt is made. power is the most intoxicating drug in the universe! So true to form, the power-hungry ( or addict ) will make an attempt to grab power. But most of the time this power grab is short-lived because people don’t like to be forced into a situation without leaving them or giving them any choices in the matter but one!

“Your going to like it!!!”

The dictator is just the same as the sphincter, looking for an opportunity’s to place himself into an insignificant but powerful position, that society will not like to live without. That once acquiring this position gives the would be dictator not only the will, but the confidence, for a takeover by force if necessary. Success will lead to a bigger power grab, or even the ultimate power grab of dictatorship! The intoxication of the drug also known as “power”, is to be somewhat like…. the feeling of being a GOD on earth, or a supreme dictator. Truly in the minds of such individuals it is just the same. A God / or a lesser God (like a dictator) still is able to ruler over everything!

In the dictators quest for power, he may try to perform magical tricks, Leading him in collecting greater powers, as well to give the impression that his rule isn’t so bad. Magic like spending mad money on projects that helps his supporters, or even putting money directly into pockets of his supporters. In their eyes he is fantastic, and may move to give even more support to him. Much like the sphincter, he to must at times perform magic trickery to fool body parts that he, and he alone is up for this job of new ruler over the brains. So he performs the trick of resembling, despite the mouths best efforts, in destroying the recognition of a corn on the cob feast! And..” Presto!!”

The dictator has somewhat the same impression, but for both the tricks only last for a short while. Then bigger tricks are needed, And this gives way to even bigger tricks, untill the law of big number catches up to them. No more tricks in their bag! To hang onto the power they have, and continue their intoxication, the use of force is pulled out of the bag! But like I said, people don’t like to be stuck with out a choice in the matter. “Your going to like it!!!” Isn’t choice or a good out look, when you haven’t made the choice yourself.

So like the sphincter, the dictator will also enjoy power for only a short period of time. When societal pressures build up to a point that even the sphincter cannot hold back the pressures any longer, the dictator will ultimately pass through the governmental sphincter, on his way to the dustpan of history.

Moral of the story is if you do not learn from history’s mistakes, then you may find yourself being controlled by a truly human sphincter!

Even though great magic tricks have been preformed in the past like the disappearance of some ears of corn on the cob. Don’t be fooled by the sphincter’s magic trick and their reappearance! The sphincter is just a cheep dictator, an opportunist of chance, but when, it’s all boiled down they’re both the same! In keeping yourself from voting for a human sphincter, recognizing that power is a drug, and changing leadership is just like sending those who have the power in the present, to rehab!! Being up tight with one kind of leader for too long is just constipating!

Being able to believe what you will, say what you will, carry a gun if you must, or improve your talents to unlock your God-given unlimited potential. Along with being able to have a reasonable expectation to life, liberty, and government limited in getting in your way of the pursuit of happiness. Is what it mean to live free in America!

Our government leaders are in service to us ( We the people ). We are never to have been servants to them! A government that barrows any amount of moneys from a foreign government, sells our sovereignty / freedom to them. We must remember the good book says; ” The borrower is a slave to the lender.” So a government that can give you everything, also can take everything from you!

Food for thought through humor.