Freedom of religion; The international community to criminalize acts of abusing great prophets?

Have we just entered into a world of kabuki theater ( to be divergent, to deviate in ref. to the early evaluation of this drama.) The twilight zone, or have the hands of time been turned back some 1400 years or so?

“The Kingdom’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh called on the international community to criminalize acts of abusing great prophets and messengers such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them all), according to a statement issued today.” ( September 16, 2012)

Is there a real need to protect the thin skinned person and or people or a compleat population? In essence protecting people of all kinds from ever experiencing ” Being offended “?

I find it hard to believe that in these modern times we live in, that we also have this need to eliminate offensive speech because it offends. Yet any reaction to the emotional outbursts of the offended usually leads to some actions designed to offend those who are perceived as having offended in the first place. This mentality of ” An eye for an eye ” doesn’t work! At its core the foresight of the founders to the United States of America were visionary’s. They knew that people who would only conduct themselves with a standard of ” Do as I say ” really didn’t have the best interests of the people in mind, nor did they believe in freedom.

“Free speech was designed to protect offensive speech.” For non offensive speech needs no protection because it doesn’t offend anyone. offensive speech therefore determined by whom to be offensive? The government, or the Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh, or some popular church of the_________ kind, or some other easily offended.. offender? What is offensive then is in the eye of the offended. But what is retalation then? That person, or persons, or even any religious sect, or compleat deceived populations of some nations run by some devious leaders. Can therefore declarer another to be offensive and just order them to stop doing what is offensive. In other words to stop an offence constitutes having to offend in return.

Who said this? Is it also offensive, and to whom?

“Zionists, who have no faith in religion or even God, now claim piety and intend to take away the Islāmic identity of the Holy Quds. This ridiculous move is in fact the continuation of the colonialist polices of oppressors, which will not save the Zionist regime, but also take the regime closer to the endpoint of its existence.”

(Speech to a delegation from the Turkish-Palestinian Parliamentary Friendship Group) curtsey of the web page; http://jcpa.org/text/ahmadinejad2-words.pdf

Incitements? Are Muslims defined as devoid of incitements of racial hatred towards others? Or is this the views of the radical Muslim hoping to hijack a religion for their end game of conquest? Are they’re beliefs the definition of multi-ethnical faith community’s built on presenting a positive image of their religion and or the practices of ” Treating everyone else in the same way as you would like others to treat their beliefs and traditions “? How can this be expressed when viewing others like, Jews, Sikhs, or even Christians differently, allowing those differences of opinions to outright offend?

October 26, 2005; Ahmadinejad speech, returned to the same theme of… ” Israel as being the dirty vermin which needs to be eradicated. The stain of disgrace will be cleaned from the garment of the world of Islam, and this is attainable.”

In another speech he mentions in describing the Israeli nation as…” Cattle, blood thirsty barbarians, criminals, as well as targeting the population as described as ( SATANIC! ). ” along with a speech in April 17, 2008 Ahmadinejad said. This region and the world are prepared for great changes and for being cleansed of satanic enemies.”

Was he fortelling the events of the recent Arab spring and the rise of radical Islam, as his nations highest national efforts of purpose?

Do we need to have an international religious hatred law? Should he  ( The Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh) also be interested in the international community criminalizing hate speech, incitement to violence and religious hatred, as already described in the above statements? If so then a few verses of the Quran will need a little adjustment!

Who will in force such a ridiculous law, who and what population will volunteer to have some kind of thought police policing what will be offensive net alone with what penalty’s for breaking it?

With Islāmic Shari’a law permitting treatment of what they consider offensive to Islam and their standards they have volunteered to live under, such as the ” Infidels ” with actions of; Beheadings, gang rape of female infidels, crucifixion, genocide without mercy, and racism stoning of the homosexuals, and people that commit adultery.

It seem more a religion of fear, rather than one of love and forgiveness.The compleat opposite of…. Thou shalt not lie: Thou shalt not steal: Thou shalt not cheat: Thou shalt not murder: Thou shalt not covet.

The mufti said. “The attempts of a filmmaker filled with hatred to Islam would not harm the great personality of the Prophet (pbuh) or anything in Islam in any manner but would only reflect on the people who spread venomous ideas.”

Then why does it have to be outlawed?

Pocket God’s. Hurricanes directed by the finger of God, or Democrats commands?

At first there was this picture of tropical storm / hurricane Isaac, and what it was most likely to do. Or at the least a projected pathway of the storm. It looked like the tropical storm / hurricane was going to upset the National republican convention ( RNC ) plans. But then storms like hurricanes move at their own speed or pace, and direction. There are even those people who belive by the direction of Gods finger, these storms move across the globe.

Because of news lately with ( R- MO ) Todd Akin comments about rape, and abortion on 8/20/12. A blizzard of his words, as the defining comments of compleat stupidity by a politician! Democrats have called for his removal from the ticket, and his quest for election to office. Because of his comments on rape and abortion . The political correctness but somewhat questionable ( women’s health issues) that democrats present to the public, are just some of their presentations of late, of politically moral superior positions. The party’s presentations of these views are desperately only trying to present a false presentation of democrats being morality right, versus the republican ideology of being morality wrong.

David Letterman poked fun at the RNC convention during his monologue of a recent show, he said. ” This is proof that God is a woman.” A poke at the GOP and the issues with what Akin said and the tropical storm / hurricane. Implying that God was going to punish the GOP for their supposed moral inferiority.

Representative Congressman Danny Davis also got into it, as a democrats back-handed slap of the Republicans, by playing the puppeteer and pulling the strings attached to God’s hand delivering the strike on the GOP, by saying. ” It means that the God’s are in favoring Democrats.

I think Representative Danny Davis forgot some recent history. Even the Nazi’s prayed to God. For the power to vanquish their enemy’s. But that didn’t mean that they had the favor of God to their political views. For the Nazi’s, at the times they were winning the war they must have thought: ” God is great! ” But later when the war turned against them: ” My God, My God, why have you forsaken us? ” How easily minds change, when God is nothing other than a puppet too your ideas.

I guess no one saw that one coming? Nor did they count on the outlook changing. One mans ” Hope and change.” Is just the other mans ” Disastrous curse. “

As the news broke about a possible hurricane barring down on the RNC. Democrats got morally religious in record speed. Invoking the idea of God’s relation in directing Tropical storm / hurricane towards their intended political enemy.

Jennifer Granholm the former Michigan Governor tweeted: ” R convention delay to Isaac: I guess God has way’s to shut that whole thing down.”

What seem to be missing about this is. These people who dare invoke the power of God’s direction of storms / natural disasters. As being their belief and punishment of their political enemy’s who are just plan wrong about everything in their views. Who then also clam to be in compleat control of directing the planet direction in curbing global warming without the help of God. By controlling carbon out puts by all humans, in the attempt to slow or even reverse the farce of global warming. Why not just ask their new buddy, in helping all of us out of this human political invention. You know? Ask God by praying to him. Asking him to intervene!

But then to the democrats God is to be only used for political gain. Like having a pocket God tucked away in your pocket. Only to be pulled out when your feeling weak, prehaps because you haven’t had lunch yet. Using God to put the republicans in their place. By punishment of their values that they seem to have apart from your own. Calling the GOP the religious right, bible thump’ers, or theists, isn’t enough. Having a hurricane barring down is better. Name calling takes a lot of energy out of the politically misguided. So why not pull out your handy-dandy pocket God. The one who will do your bidding according to your accusation and or commands towards your political enemy’s.

Why not? The republican’s and the ” religious right ” who have their pocket bibles… the equivalents of your pocket God’s? Right?

With in 7 hours Jennifer Granholm tweeted: ” Just kidding! ” As if to say; you caught me.. I don’t really believe in God so how can he push storms towards the RNC.

Isaac has the true potential of turning into a full-blown hurricane, and how it is tracking now after all of the political posturing. ( Look at the next picture of the track of the tropical storm Isaac.)

The political democrat narrative should be changing some what now with this up date. In quantifying detached irony, Democrats now have to deal with the political accusations of God directing the storm towards the evil RNC, to the storm having the possibility’s of hitting New Orléans again, some 7 years to the date of hurricane ” Katrina  in 8/26/2005 “. I hope now Democrats, you can see the folly of using God as some clique that requires conformity to your values in order to have a belief in God by your design. Rather then believing in an all-powerful God who controls that what is uncontrollable by humans.

So, are Hurricanes directed by the finger of God? Or just a pocket God’s message of folly, like the one’s of ” Hope and change. / Global warming ” ?

I suppose we must be careful of what we hope for and the changes brought about by unintended consequences of misguided words or actions, of what is only believed to be political correctness.

Your comments are welcome.