Chris Matthews’ Sunday program, The Chris Matthews Show has been cancelled.

Chris Matthews’ Sunday program, The Chris Matthews Show has been cancelled.

Chris Matthews wasn’t a great talent on MSNBC, but resembled a manure-spreader of political thought.

In what other media described as the “long running show,” was little more than NBC throwing lots of crap against the wall, hoping it would stick.

Negative politics are like that. A crap happy type of person that throws crap for a living, then ducks the truth, and dodges facts in their reporting, as their personal effort in wear less crap on their suit at the end of the day seems to be the game within political theater. A theater where Chris Matthews lived, but then pigs like to wallow in the muck, and Matthews seemed happiest when he was up to his lower lip in muck making waves in the hope in dimming the light of truth.

It was bound to happen though. Finley media has come to its senses by pushing Chris aside, and hopefully replacing him with a more truthful talent or a more entertaining show at the least? Have they finely realized that the truth has no agenda? Or am I just dreaming here? Something Chris seemed to never fully understand, but then you can’t blame an animal that hasn’t evolved yet. After all he felt a tingling feeling running up his leg when Mr. Obama was elected. With closer examination, he would have realized that he was tinkling on an electric fence within the political theater he lives. Now that the animal has left the barn it is time to close the barn door.”The final episode will run on July 21 to a viewership of…Chris Matthews’ TiVo.”

Chris Matthews Show Cancelled http://theblacksphere.net/2013/05/chris-matthews-show-cancelled/ via @Theblacksphere

Advertisements

Should middle schools be teaching lesbian kissing??

News report from; Red Hook N.Y.

Parents of children attending a Red Hook, N.Y., middle school are outraged after a recent anti-bullying presentation at Linden Avenue Middle School.

The workshop for 13- and 14-year-old girls focused on homosexuality and gender identity. They were also taught words such as “pansexual” and “genderqueer.”

Parents say their daughters were told to ask one another for a kiss, and they say two girls were told to stand in front of the class and pretend they were lesbians on a date.

Middle School Girls Told to Ask for Lesbian Kiss During Class http://www.charismanews.com/culture/39237-middle-school-girls-told-to-ask-for-lesbian-kiss-during-class via @sharethis

Why was this only reportedly for 13-and 14-year-old girls, why not the boys as well? Not that we support such behaviors in a public school system as part of a well-rounded education. If this is the kind of thing to support within our school systems, shouldn’t we also be supportive of gay students acting as if they were straight, telling them in a class room setting to kiss the opposite sex? Would that be over the top, or cruel? Is this what passes for a good education? What does this kind of instruction really do for these young minds?

Can someone be taught a sexual orientation, or is it just a complex interplay of genetic factors? If we were to except that there is a genetic factor to what defines a person’s sexual orientation; then this kind of class room education, as was done in the Red Hook N.Y middle school would be cruel, unusual, insulting, demeaning, to those school age girls that wouldn’t be genetically predisposed to such orientation. If there could be a factor that sexual orientation is learned, instead of being genetic, then what was this school thinking with the exercise? Is it a schools responsibility to produce more of a certain type of people sexually, or just to provide a well-rounded education to all types of people regardless of sexual orientation?

Even in that bastion of liberalism “California” They have “Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight”. Why any schools would then try to turn “Straight People Gay”, with lessens that resemble sexual experimentation on young impressionable minds?

California to Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/05/08/california-to-ban-therapies-that-try-to-turn-gay-people-straight/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=Share%20Buttons

It simply is amazing that these days young girls can without parental guidance; get free birth control, and abortions services. But can’t bring aspirin to school, can’t sign a contract to buy a car or rent an apartment…and so on. They can’t get married without parental permission, but society supports if a mistake is made, welfare services for expectant mothers whether they are living at home or not. Schools are becoming a place where parents are forced to send their kids, to receive an orientation that undermines the family structure, religious value systems or even morals. A far cry from what was intended to be a public education, an education that would consist of reading, writing, arithmetic, and sciences…ect. To now day’s what has become, “Sexual Social Design”, through a social engineering within the liberal-mind set. Freedom of choice, individual or otherwise isn’t an option with liberal policies. Unless people start to defend their rights and demand a change, this will become the standards in the future, or worse!

An Obstructionist view to the good, the bad, and the ugly, and modern slaves.

From Examiner

On Wednesday 12/13/2012, singer Harry Belafonte offered some friendly advice for Barack Obama while speaking with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. In his view, the president should rule like a third world dictator and throw the GOP in jail for opposing him.

“That there should be this lingering infestation of really corrupt people who sit trying to dismantle the wishes of the people, the mandate that has been given to Barack Obama, and I don’t know what more they want. The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a third world dictator and just put all these guys in jail,” he said.

Mr. Belafonte must have never hear of limited and separation of powers and a limited government? A representation by the people who voted for their representatives in government. The left loves to say. “Elections have consequences.” Until they have to live with the consequences of any elections they disagree with.

I suppose the left has forgotten that in 2010 the people voted overwhelmingly to control spending, by limiting government, as why the GOP Tea party won overwhelmingly in the house of representatives. Now these same people are called “obstructionists” by the liberal left. Liberals are forgetting facts of truth totally, offering complaints to them, by saying that elections have consequences, but refusing to see the election results in terms of people speaking to their political leaders, over that as being only a win or a loss in any election.

In America we don’t elect a dictatorship ( a winner take all, completely unopposed power, a situation in having to accept only the winners policies). We elect officials who hopefully have the ability’s to perswade people to see their points of view, and then voting on those points. Not to drag people, kicking and screaming, in excepting or invoke political policies of crisis, or manipulating people in selecting only from these solutions of more spending and borrowing. What is said to be those same failed solutions of uncontrolled government, that only seems to lead to an even more manipulative or uncomfortable life, within an identical crisis to the past.

“Nothing is accomplished in facing tomorrows responsibility’s, by refusing to act on todays responsibility’s.” unknown.

Doing the same things over and over expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

To call your political opponents obstructionist because you dislike their politics, or at the very least, want them to compromise their principles, is just using a dictator’s vision,” In order to get along, you must go along.”

One man’s obstructionist is another man’s conservationist. Who would be working to protect against socialist dictators using command and control style governing as the only option. The left seem to be using crisis, or the creations of them, to increase the need for government to take power and liberty from the people, thus killing the future needs to vote on issues. After all if you don’t support winners policies then you are an obstructionists to them, all because elections have consequences you know?

Using the terms of……. “Elections have consequences.” never seem to sink into the liberal mind, when they have to deal with a loss of an election. Funny that the left then also starts to use terms like “obstructionist” in describing someone who is doing their job, according to the people that voted these politicians into office. Liberals tend to overlook that there is more to an election year then who won the presidents office.

When that doesn’t work they seem to use stronger terms like Mr. Belafonte used, “Infestation”! So when Republicans or Tea-party people were elected to office, charged with doing the job as the people’s representatives, in stopping Obama’s reckless policies, they can now be considered to be an “infestation” in government. The descriptive nature of these words and others, describing your political rivals as being the problem, while hiding the true nature of the problem, is governing through fear. Because words have meanings the word choice is interesting, since one normally deals with an infestation by eliminating it. Can there really be any room for compromise, or honestly any bipartisanship, or a willingness, for these opposed powers in working together?

Republicans, or Tea party patriots, the faster you realize the facts, that the Democrats are out to eliminate you as a relevant political force, if not totally eliminate you, because you’re position and opposition to their brand of socialism designed for a total takeover, a total power grab through corruption of the election proses. The better you will be equipped with the power to recognize that you and you alone are the last conservationists of liberty, and freedom in America. If they look at you as an infestation, then you can’t ever compromise your principles in trying to co-govern with the enemies of liberty and freedom, who would deal with any infestation like a third world dictator by eliminating it.

The importance of the debt limit isn’t in limiting government from paying bills. But limiting government in increasing its size, and moving away from its importance of its spending as a driving force in the economy. Future growth borrowed from the bank of China, with the belief that our children will be all too happy to pay these bills, while receiving nothing in return for these payments. Is taxation without representation!

The borrower is a slave to the lender! Borrowing more and more to function as a society, as an economy, or as a government, is just sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

The function of any limit, is to give a warning to the danger of going past your limits, before you even get there, so you can avoid any and all negative consequences for going past them.

Constantly moving your limits, pretending they were always ment to be moved, all because of being ill-equipped to deal with the problem, doesn’t resolve or prevent any problems, nor is it a solution. It is a symptom of the addiction.

Democrats when faced with having to reduce spending on their favorite programs, the project devastation they present, along with some frightful out comes, or some kind of uncomfortable existences, as being inhumane, abusive and uncaring treatment, are the results of policies of the opposition party. Obscuring the facts of finance, that prosperity and wealthy, is never an accomplished goal by being asset poor and mountain of debt rich.

If Liberty is to become extinct it is because the conservationists (GOP conservatives) are not willing to do the hard work, the unpopular work of presenting the arguments in a persuasive way to the public. Only quietly going along, to get along, isn’t governing from the perspective in preserving the constitution for all from all foreign or domestic enemy’s. Compromise isn’t any tool used in making persuasive arguments, but is excepting a more comfortable defeat.

When was an unlimited debt ever the principles of our founding?

Government doesn’t produce anything, it taxes all economic production of the people, and then by definition is a growth inhibitor.

Politically speaking. We must recognize that every dime spent in payment to the interest on our debts, is a drag on future growth, future job creation, future security, future economical innovations, while increasing the size of todays obstacles into impossible ones, for future leaderships to deal with. We today are standing at the generational crossroads, deciding what kind of future our kids will have, or can expect. If we the adults in society or in government, are only interested in working for the extravagances of life, allowing ourselves only to enjoy freedom and liberty. Then we must honestly confess, too our own selfish greed, “That we don’t care about our youth”! What gives us the rights to sell, those freedoms and liberty’s, those God-given rights, that our kids should also be able to expect for themselves, with indifference to enslaving them to foreign banks, and treasonous governments, forcing them to pay for our extravagance of today? The borrower is a slave to the lender! How can we then enjoy our extravagances by selling “Our kids ” and their lives into slavery tomorrow?

Modern third world dictators always use the command and control style of governance in solving a self-made crisis while also reducing any powers that oppose it. The Democrat party, and prehaps some of the Republican party, must see themself’s as the slave masters of tomorrow? By wanting to eliminate all infestations / or opposition to their support of policies like, unlimited debt, and the slow erosion of liberty, their policies only seem to managed the decay, over finding true positive solutions.

When has a Democratic policy, a socialist solution, ever been purposed to the people resulted in a reversal of the social decline within society? Liberal policies have only added to a farther decline. Will the Modern Republican party embrace conservative principles, present them publicly and persuasively, or will they allow liberty’s extinction, by finely drowning it to death, with debt?

Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College

 Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College campus in Cypress, Texas, after a male suspect reportedly used a small knife, ran from building to building and randomly attacked individuals along the way.

The conditions of the victims are unclear, but four were taken by life flight for treatment, which indicates severe injuries. Twelve of the victims in all were hospitalized and two refused treatment. Witnesses reported seeing students with stab wounds to the neck.

Police got the initial report at 11:15 a.m. A suspect with a knife was reported on the sprawling campus on the Northwest side of Houston and there were reports of multiple stab victims. The school was placed on lockdown. The length of the attack is unclear, but the suspect was reportedly taken down by a student.

@FoxNews: a dozen injured in stabbing attack at #Houston-area college campus http://fxn.ws/10FZW8z

Banning the weapon, any weapon is the legislative easy way out to governing. Banning evil intention is also hard if not impossible to do, without some kind of thought police. But if we had thought police, any brain-dead legislator purposing a weapons ban, should be arrested for crimes against humanity; or at the very least held responsible for future victims of violence at the hands of such weapons, because criminals don’t follow laws or regulations.

It just shows that controlling or banning the weapons of choice, chosen by the criminal isn’t a deterrent to violence. Nor is there any more safety to our collages or students that go to them. To then glorify the need to control any weapon as a way to reduce violence is just not supported by the facts or statics. To use violent acts by deranged people looking for the easiest victims possible, as a way to reduce the personal individual responsibility’s (not to mention your God-given right) to protect one’s self, is by its self an act of legislative derangement.

Our representatives should use common sense over that of a knee-jerk reaction to remained popular, or maintaining their electability. After all they protect themselves with armed guards or police officers. Why then should the citizenry be reduced to a second class importance with their protection over violent people doing violence against them?

Clearly a weapon in the hands of any individual then possesses the power in that situation, to use it for good or evil, to use it in senseless acts of violence or putting an end to them. I seem to remember that every act of violence ends 100% of the time with a weapon in the hands of a good person willing to also use that weapon against violent perpetrators of crime, risking personal injury to themselves for someone else’s safety.

Banning any weapons in the hands of the people; expecting them to protect themselves until police officers arrive on the scene would be just as deranged as to expect police officers to go weaponless into the same situation to disarm the perpetrators. Clearly our legislators wouldn’t allow themselves to have unarmed police officers as their protection detail, even after, should they ever become successful in banning weapons?

So the theory becomes fact! A weapon in the hands of a good person doesn’t create future victims. But evenly distributes, balancing the power in the struggle for the ultimate power between the would be victim, and the deranged violent person.

The dangers of butter or knives? (Mass Middle School Suspends Girl For Bringing Butter Knife With Her Lunch…))

ATTLEBORO, Mass. (MyFoxBoston.com) –  It seem that butter knives are just to dangerous in the hands of school age children who don’t know better. But then recently in the light of political correctness, other stories have boiled to the surface of our modern asylum. Stories of the boy who got in trouble for throwing imaginary hand-grenades, killing imaginary villains of the world; because he thought of himself while playing an imaginary game of the mind, as imaginary super hero saving the world. Are we now killing the inspiration of any future super hero, who may also see the need and have the willingness to save us from ourselves?

Boy, 7, suspended from school for throwing imaginary hand grenade http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2013/02/06/boy-7-suspended-from-school-for-throwing-imaginary-hand-grenade/

Have we forgotten that schools back in the olden days taught to imagine, to dream, innovate, invent, while providing inspiration, and encourage students who would guide us all into the future? All sorts of modern products and devices were the result of such an education. Schools should then be dreamland’s of sorts, visionary zones?

Instead we have transformed them to become prisons of insanity, devoid of freely promoting common sense, critical thought, and to dream big or go home. The creed of winners! Isn’t that the way to preparation for a changing future?

We should teach to impress, to create an excitement of learning in students, over the false education that these schools of modern age now teach. Today we paralyze critical thinking through the magnification of present dangers, like those butter knives, and imaginary hand-grenades. We inspire as well teach kids to trust teachers and administrators or other government employees, over even their own parents, by confiscating lunches; declaring them not healthy, uneatable, as if loving parents don’t really care? Lessens that certainly can imprint all sorts of fear in the minds of our youth today.

http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/childs-lunch-allegedly-taken-by-teacher-told-it-wasnt-healthy-enough

ATTLEBORO, Mass. (MyFoxBoston.com) – From a toy gun to a butter knife, a new controversy has arisen over an item a student brought to a local school Wednesday.

Morgan LaPlaume, a Wamsutta Middle School student, was simply trying to cut her fruit for lunch because she has braces and can’t take bites out of whole fruit, says the LaPlaume family.

During lunch, the vice principal happened to be walking by when he reportedly saw Morgan with the butter knife, took her to his office, and issued her a suspension.

In the land that gave birth of unlimited imagination, the creed of being “all that you can be”, as well as inspirational entertainments delivering new dreams, imaginations, through the stories of “Super Man” and others,( where good always triumphs over evil). Why do our teachers seem to be behind the learning curve? It seems that only in the specialized education systems of teaching the handicap; is where teachers are still teaching the lessons of self-reliance, the can-do-attitude, supporting efforts through inspiration of overcoming obstacles?

Today we create insurmountable walls out of false standards and the fear of bad lunches, butter knives, and the free will to imagine. We have allowed the evil change to take place, of what we once was thought our teachers were, ” the Supper men and women” of education. But now, allowing them to be transformed into the “JOKERS” of the day!

“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”.

“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”. “1984”

We started a “War on Poverty” in 1965; there are Millions more in poverty today than back then.

We started the “War on Drugs” in the 1970’s.  Hundreds of thousands have been killed or jailed, and there are more drugs in the US than ever before.

We started a “War on Terrorism” in 2002″ and terrorists now control more nations than ever before.

In 2009 we started a war on the “Greedy rich”, those corporations, company’s and the greedy bankers at its center of this new religion of greed. Looking for a government to tax the greed out of them completely. Yet we now have an even larger government, an ever increasingly greedy population of citizens, followed by an ever-increasing greedy politician in office legislating the new rules, regulations, definitions and laws to deal with the world of greed, resulting in its magnification within society. At the same time protecting the endangered species, the greedy political official looking for reelection.

We started a political war on “Women” in 2012. A politically created division within groups of people and their genders, all of which are now competing for preferential treatment by governmental policies. Showered with money and attention, bought and paid for by a newly protected group, a societal superior, over every other voter group. I suppose we could just call it a forced evolution, a survival of the fittest, that has all ready prostituted itself to government which controls the nature of evolution in the first place. Today the war on women, tomorrow the war on the planet through the use of global warming??

In 2012 we also started the war on “Offences”;

Obama’s quote…..”there is no future for those who choose to slander the prophet of Islam.” President Obama said in a speech to the UN.

Because Islam and other religious and non religious groups are easily offended. We must use governmental controls of what is and what isn’t offensive, ( political correct terms that is). Of course while outlawing offences of the smallest kind we tend to offend the people or groups of every kind, who would also express an opinion of their own. Because these opinions are still offensive to others. In stead of peacefully agreeing to disagree, they only express disagreement.  saying Marry Christmas shouldn’t be so disagreeable, but to an overly sensitive person who also is an atheist? This is too much! To the terrorist who wishes to wipe out the infidel by blowing them up along with himself in order to gain a place in heaven surrounded by virgins. Wether it is agreeable, or disagreeable, or offensive to either side, even to those who must die or to those who must stop the madness, we shouldn’t be slandering the islamic prophet / religion? Wouldn’t this be showing preferential treatment for one religion practices over the others, no matter how misguided it seems to be, by allowing venomous reactions without outrage against such, is itself offensive? Would we not then be offending the Grim Reaper or death itself by defending life through modern medical practices or techniques? All that has been accomplished in the war on offence is an ever thinner skinned population competing for their group to be recognised in gaining approval, offensive superiority supported by the laws of the land.  Of course to the anarchist this is also offensive, to have laws, net alone a government who would in force them.

When it comes to the war on offence, it is a lose / lose proposition. Offences survives on either side of the coin. Prehaps we should abandon our war on offence and go straight for the new war on WHINING! Eliminating that, could resolve things that the weak-minded can’t, who use being offended as their weapon of choice, trying to gain control over you and your actions, in limiting reactions or choices, at the very least, by whining about everything.

Early in 2013 we now have renewed the war on guns. After 20 kids got killed by some crazy gun-man. Not to make light of the tragedy of what was the sandy hook school massacre in new town CT. But banning a gun does little to nothing in changing the mind of the criminal who has chosen to do evil. Besides, why is it now proper for the president and government to wage war on the gun after 20 victims? Where were these wizards of wisdom in the Chicago wars? The casualty’s in 2012 in Chicago have surpassed the death toll of Afghanistan. When the president says. ” We must try to do something, even if it stops just one person from being killed.” Yet with a philosophy of stopping just one more needless death, should the population be limited in its freedoms, and rights? Or is this just a price to pay to be living in an uncertain world, where nothing is guaranteed? Autos kill far more people than guns, no one is banning the use of autos. Drunk drivers kill even more people than the proclaimed “One” by the president. Should we re-ban alcohol? How about the parking lots at the bar?

When we look at the statistics last year we had 11,000 gun related deaths, down from the 20,000 plus gun deaths in 1980. The ratio of volume of weapons vs. deaths by weapons is in decline, as is the case in the statistical evidence in the state of California. Gun bans don’t work! Because it only regulates the law-abiding citizen, not the lawless citizen who doesn’t follow laws. With 1.4% of gun victims last year coming from the weapons government is now trying to ban, it seems out-of-place, or is this just the beginning of what will be the slippery slope to an out-right total gun ban?

It seem in order to protect this society from needless deaths at the hands of criminals who by their nature doesn’t follow any laws, or rules of conscience within society. Would be a waste of resources if we don’t engage the true source of the problem. It would be better to have a war on the mentally ill, or at least people who are weak-minded or have a lack of morals. Maybe movie makers, or video game makers, is what we should be warring against because they should have a bigger responsibility to society. For they influence the weak-minded? After all, the movies, and TV, and video games have become the advertisements of violence that may entice weak-minded people, in acting out with violence. Advertisements do work in getting people to act, other wise companies wouldn’t spend millions of dollars each year on them. If there is a marinade of violence on the weak-minded like this, wouldn’t that also be a problem? Every mass-shooting has found that the shooter to have a fascination with these kinds of entertanments.Treating the weak-minded / mentally ill with dignity and respect in helping them is far better, then limiting the law-abiding citizen as if they are the danger to society. If we chose to bathe in a sewer, should we also expect an improvement just because we using the excuse ” we used soap!”??

Aren’t all these wars “For the good of the people, to keep them safe and secure, even from themselves”?

Truly, we are living Orwell’s nightmare.

Rearranging the constitution

The problem with the modern Democrats is that they think rules don’t apply to their style of governing. The constitution is living, therefore is changing, only if it can change in their favor. Trying to rearrange the constitution or the amendments, like the 14th amendment is just a distortion to get the population in favor of doing something on the behalf of the nation’s debt. But to the democrats it is an opportunity of a created crisis to change the constitution in their favor. They’re opinion of the 14th amendment section 4 that the nation has to pay all debts incur. Of course they would like to distort the definition of just what a social entitlement is. In their view it is a social debt. But in the 14th amendment section 5 it is clear they are wrong with who gets to make debt repayment arrangements.

14th Amendment Debt Ceiling Option: House Democrats Support Obama’s Use Of Power http://huff.to/VHv581 via @HuffPostPol

By JIM ABRAMS, The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — House Democrats say President Barack Obama should consider invoking a little-known constitutional provision that they say gives him the power to raise the debt ceiling without going through Congress, where Republicans are demanding that a debt ceiling vote be linked to spending cuts.

The Democrats said in a letter that they would support the use of any authority, including the 14th Amendment, to prevent the nation from going into default; an event that some economists predict could trigger a global recession.

That post-Civil War amendment contains a section stating that “the validity of the public debt of the United States…shall not be questioned.”

With the Obama administrations continual assault on the constitution, they recognize no boundary’s while in massing power for themselves while destroying the opposition in the GOP. Problem with destroying the opposition with uncontrolled spending on social entitlements, it gets a large portion of the populace believing that government will provide every need to them. When this expectation exceeds the government’s ability to provide, social unrest, at best, will be guaranteed. What is happening in Greece and Argentina is the best modern times example of just this, and what social unrest will look like possibly.

Have included the direct copy of the 14th amendment section 4&5. (5 is quite clear that congress has the legal right to all spending issues.) Any attempt to undermine congress or the constitution with some “presidential orders” is troubling. What would be more troubling is if the congress (the GOP) doesn’t choose to fight the democrats / the president on this as being unconstitutional. There is no room for compromise, and no time for Jell-O like principles.

Section. 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section. 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

The information was provided from the web pages of …..

U.S. Constitution

U.S. Constitution Annotations