Chris Matthews’ Sunday program, The Chris Matthews Show has been cancelled.

Chris Matthews’ Sunday program, The Chris Matthews Show has been cancelled.

Chris Matthews wasn’t a great talent on MSNBC, but resembled a manure-spreader of political thought.

In what other media described as the “long running show,” was little more than NBC throwing lots of crap against the wall, hoping it would stick.

Negative politics are like that. A crap happy type of person that throws crap for a living, then ducks the truth, and dodges facts in their reporting, as their personal effort in wear less crap on their suit at the end of the day seems to be the game within political theater. A theater where Chris Matthews lived, but then pigs like to wallow in the muck, and Matthews seemed happiest when he was up to his lower lip in muck making waves in the hope in dimming the light of truth.

It was bound to happen though. Finley media has come to its senses by pushing Chris aside, and hopefully replacing him with a more truthful talent or a more entertaining show at the least? Have they finely realized that the truth has no agenda? Or am I just dreaming here? Something Chris seemed to never fully understand, but then you can’t blame an animal that hasn’t evolved yet. After all he felt a tingling feeling running up his leg when Mr. Obama was elected. With closer examination, he would have realized that he was tinkling on an electric fence within the political theater he lives. Now that the animal has left the barn it is time to close the barn door.”The final episode will run on July 21 to a viewership of…Chris Matthews’ TiVo.”

Chris Matthews Show Cancelled http://theblacksphere.net/2013/05/chris-matthews-show-cancelled/ via @Theblacksphere

Too mooch, or not to mooch! (Obama-nomics; chief designer of “Pimp my pantry”)

Wrenching a world apart with failed political policies, leaving people pointing finger at each other calling names, “Well you’re a taker, and I’m a maker.” one side calls out.

The other side responds, “No you’re a greedy rich person, and we are the people in need!”

This is where the people of this once great nation have ended up after Obama-nomics?  Once people came to this nation only wanting an equal opportunity. Now they come hoping for an un-equaled amount of handouts, while taking their time to find some personal footing. Can you blame the people? I blame the politicians! After all we the America people, have come to know this America, through the eyes of the rest of the poor world, now flooding into this nation looking for charity, if not demanding it.

At least through the distorted view of the liberal government official, that also sees the world differently out of their own guilt, paints a picture of national guilt, accusing the nation of not wanting to help people in need as their guilty manipulation. A means to grab even more power for themselves by brow beating people into feeling guilty of their accomplishments, or just being guilty for having been born an American.

What is the point of having lines on paper representing boarders, If the politicians of the day (the gate keepers) selectively choose wether or not to enforce the laws, or even locking the gates?

There used to be a requirement in order to be able to enter the country as a permanent immigrant. Today to use the term “Illegal alien” is cruel, inhuman. The progressives and the proper political correctness have created terms to be used with people who break the law in coming to America. The proper term now is “Illegal immigrant”. To lessen the personal pain of the criminal immigrant for breaking the law, or to cause guilty feelings of the rest of the American people, because of their immigrant heritage? Immigrants of the past used to come here offering skills and looking to exchange those skills for equal free opportunity’s. Today a good portion of immigrants are offering little skill other than a potential democratic vote, for all of the free stuff they can haul away in those hands of opportunity.

I mean, what would you do if you came home from work and found 20 people in your living room and you didn’t know where they came from despite the law of the land? When you complained about the problem, you only discovered that those laws on the books were only selectively enforced. When you complained some more about the added costs you were experiencing, you were deemed as a greedy bastard. The political correct view, of you, Joe Blow Citizen seems to be, a hater of poor people.

Under Obama life isn’t too far from that. Speaking to power and telling them that we are broke, out of money and adding too much debt to the national balance sheet. Just goes un-heard, or worse ignored? They (The powerful in government) respond with. “What? We are the richest nation on earth, because of that  we need to help the poor!”

In fact I have never known a single so-called rich person, or a nation, past or present, that has also given away their riches faster and faster than their incomes, then borrowed even more money and they still some how remained the status of being “Rich”, nor have they no matter how well-intentioned ever reduced the needs of the poor.

Since 1963, the year the policy “The war on poverty” was conceived, American politicians have spent 16 trillion dollars on helping the poor, hoping to reduce poverty in America. Today we have a national debt of the same, with an even larger segment of the population needing help from the government. It is clear, government policies create dependency. This in a nation that celebrates on the 4th of July–“Independence”! Go figure.

What is more upsetting then poor people’s needs, legal or illegal, is the politicization of misconstrued facts. I’m trying to be nicer and kinder these days so I used “Misconstrued” instead of “flat-out liars about the facts”! Mr. Obama closed down the White house tours, and blamed the sequester, then followed up with delay’s of air traffic. Making sure that comfortable delays would be realized by the traveler as a gift of the furloughed air traffic controllers in major cities. Totally leaving the Washington DC air traffic unhampered, unaffected, controllers un-furloughed. who’d a thought? It shows that this president is willing to hurt the American people and the economy, for political points, for the sake of winning unreasonable, unpopular, manipulated political arguments.

After all it is only the rich who travel, and they can afford some pain to help the poor, right?

With all of this going around the various news agencies, where is the news on the “Food stamp recruiters” trying to give away the last bit of money left in the treasury before the American people truly realize that government is truly the enemy of the people and any of the people’s wealth? Yes that’s right, food stamp recruiters trying to get people to sign up for what is termed— as their benefits that their entitled to. So these stamp recruiters have been seen around the golf courses in Florida recruiting retired people. Honestly people who play golf don’t need food stamps!  With the sequester in place, where are these programs getting their money from, not only for the food give aways but also to pay the recruiters, when we supposedly can’t even pay air traffic controllers?

Yep! You get the picture all right. Mr. Obama couldn’t manage himself out of a wet paper bag, facts are, in truth he is the mismanage-er-in-chief. He and he alone is the chief designer of “Pimp my pantry” with all of the free food giveaway’s. Why are these well-intentioned programs also being abused by people? Why can they use their benefits at their local strip clubs/bars, casinos, or even selling their stamps on-line so they could use the money on who knows what? Why is it a cruel abuse, to denied a poor person the ability’s of seeing a nude women, when that money should have bought food and diapers for their kids? Why can they do this without prosecutions? Call it, the Obama bucks give away! Much like the Obama phones of yesterday. Now who’s guilty of being “Greedy”?

But the richest nation on earth isn’t out of money, until the redistribution of the term “rich” is complete? Of course there will still be rich people here in the good old USA, in fact more than the rest of the world? It is just re-applying the term rich to people who will have a lot less wealth after Obama is through. So what happens to the poor people of the world? Will the term “Poor” be massaged into a new term less demeaning? Will poor people go the way of the dinosaur? Will poor people still be making their demands of the socialists of the world until wealth is totally destroyed, and misery is the new equally?

It seems when the value of money is destroyed, political clout, such as food stamps, will become the new unit of exchange to be used?

When the American people realize that they can vote into office people that will benefit themselves without having to make a reasonable effort for themselves; that is when the spark of freedom will have been extinguished, and mob rule will replace rule of law.

“The fastest way to destroy your enemy in a modern world, with less cost then fighting a war, is controlling the food supply! Every nation will fall when the people demand more food then supply’s exist.” paraphrased from a speech that Henry Kissinger gave at the end of the Vietnam war. The same applies to when a government gives food away; who’s going to receive that benefits and then vote to end that policy? Do these people realize that they are selling their freedoms of tomorrow?

Moocher Nation: Paid Food Stamp Recruiters – 620 WTMJ … http://www.620wtmj.com/blogs/charliesykes/204649971

Florida, other states, hires recruiters to sign up food stamps – UPI.com http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2013/04/25/Florida-other-states-hire-recruiters-to-sign-up-food-stamps/UPI-30891366869297/

Fla. bill would ban using food stamps for stripper, casino tabs … http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/03/16/fla-bill-would-ban-using-food-stamps-for-stripper-casino-tabs-55875

Should middle schools be teaching lesbian kissing??

News report from; Red Hook N.Y.

Parents of children attending a Red Hook, N.Y., middle school are outraged after a recent anti-bullying presentation at Linden Avenue Middle School.

The workshop for 13- and 14-year-old girls focused on homosexuality and gender identity. They were also taught words such as “pansexual” and “genderqueer.”

Parents say their daughters were told to ask one another for a kiss, and they say two girls were told to stand in front of the class and pretend they were lesbians on a date.

Middle School Girls Told to Ask for Lesbian Kiss During Class http://www.charismanews.com/culture/39237-middle-school-girls-told-to-ask-for-lesbian-kiss-during-class via @sharethis

Why was this only reportedly for 13-and 14-year-old girls, why not the boys as well? Not that we support such behaviors in a public school system as part of a well-rounded education. If this is the kind of thing to support within our school systems, shouldn’t we also be supportive of gay students acting as if they were straight, telling them in a class room setting to kiss the opposite sex? Would that be over the top, or cruel? Is this what passes for a good education? What does this kind of instruction really do for these young minds?

Can someone be taught a sexual orientation, or is it just a complex interplay of genetic factors? If we were to except that there is a genetic factor to what defines a person’s sexual orientation; then this kind of class room education, as was done in the Red Hook N.Y middle school would be cruel, unusual, insulting, demeaning, to those school age girls that wouldn’t be genetically predisposed to such orientation. If there could be a factor that sexual orientation is learned, instead of being genetic, then what was this school thinking with the exercise? Is it a schools responsibility to produce more of a certain type of people sexually, or just to provide a well-rounded education to all types of people regardless of sexual orientation?

Even in that bastion of liberalism “California” They have “Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight”. Why any schools would then try to turn “Straight People Gay”, with lessens that resemble sexual experimentation on young impressionable minds?

California to Ban Therapies That Try to Turn Gay People Straight http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/05/08/california-to-ban-therapies-that-try-to-turn-gay-people-straight/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=Share%20Buttons

It simply is amazing that these days young girls can without parental guidance; get free birth control, and abortions services. But can’t bring aspirin to school, can’t sign a contract to buy a car or rent an apartment…and so on. They can’t get married without parental permission, but society supports if a mistake is made, welfare services for expectant mothers whether they are living at home or not. Schools are becoming a place where parents are forced to send their kids, to receive an orientation that undermines the family structure, religious value systems or even morals. A far cry from what was intended to be a public education, an education that would consist of reading, writing, arithmetic, and sciences…ect. To now day’s what has become, “Sexual Social Design”, through a social engineering within the liberal-mind set. Freedom of choice, individual or otherwise isn’t an option with liberal policies. Unless people start to defend their rights and demand a change, this will become the standards in the future, or worse!

An Obstructionist view to the good, the bad, and the ugly, and modern slaves.

From Examiner

On Wednesday 12/13/2012, singer Harry Belafonte offered some friendly advice for Barack Obama while speaking with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. In his view, the president should rule like a third world dictator and throw the GOP in jail for opposing him.

“That there should be this lingering infestation of really corrupt people who sit trying to dismantle the wishes of the people, the mandate that has been given to Barack Obama, and I don’t know what more they want. The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a third world dictator and just put all these guys in jail,” he said.

Mr. Belafonte must have never hear of limited and separation of powers and a limited government? A representation by the people who voted for their representatives in government. The left loves to say. “Elections have consequences.” Until they have to live with the consequences of any elections they disagree with.

I suppose the left has forgotten that in 2010 the people voted overwhelmingly to control spending, by limiting government, as why the GOP Tea party won overwhelmingly in the house of representatives. Now these same people are called “obstructionists” by the liberal left. Liberals are forgetting facts of truth totally, offering complaints to them, by saying that elections have consequences, but refusing to see the election results in terms of people speaking to their political leaders, over that as being only a win or a loss in any election.

In America we don’t elect a dictatorship ( a winner take all, completely unopposed power, a situation in having to accept only the winners policies). We elect officials who hopefully have the ability’s to perswade people to see their points of view, and then voting on those points. Not to drag people, kicking and screaming, in excepting or invoke political policies of crisis, or manipulating people in selecting only from these solutions of more spending and borrowing. What is said to be those same failed solutions of uncontrolled government, that only seems to lead to an even more manipulative or uncomfortable life, within an identical crisis to the past.

“Nothing is accomplished in facing tomorrows responsibility’s, by refusing to act on todays responsibility’s.” unknown.

Doing the same things over and over expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

To call your political opponents obstructionist because you dislike their politics, or at the very least, want them to compromise their principles, is just using a dictator’s vision,” In order to get along, you must go along.”

One man’s obstructionist is another man’s conservationist. Who would be working to protect against socialist dictators using command and control style governing as the only option. The left seem to be using crisis, or the creations of them, to increase the need for government to take power and liberty from the people, thus killing the future needs to vote on issues. After all if you don’t support winners policies then you are an obstructionists to them, all because elections have consequences you know?

Using the terms of……. “Elections have consequences.” never seem to sink into the liberal mind, when they have to deal with a loss of an election. Funny that the left then also starts to use terms like “obstructionist” in describing someone who is doing their job, according to the people that voted these politicians into office. Liberals tend to overlook that there is more to an election year then who won the presidents office.

When that doesn’t work they seem to use stronger terms like Mr. Belafonte used, “Infestation”! So when Republicans or Tea-party people were elected to office, charged with doing the job as the people’s representatives, in stopping Obama’s reckless policies, they can now be considered to be an “infestation” in government. The descriptive nature of these words and others, describing your political rivals as being the problem, while hiding the true nature of the problem, is governing through fear. Because words have meanings the word choice is interesting, since one normally deals with an infestation by eliminating it. Can there really be any room for compromise, or honestly any bipartisanship, or a willingness, for these opposed powers in working together?

Republicans, or Tea party patriots, the faster you realize the facts, that the Democrats are out to eliminate you as a relevant political force, if not totally eliminate you, because you’re position and opposition to their brand of socialism designed for a total takeover, a total power grab through corruption of the election proses. The better you will be equipped with the power to recognize that you and you alone are the last conservationists of liberty, and freedom in America. If they look at you as an infestation, then you can’t ever compromise your principles in trying to co-govern with the enemies of liberty and freedom, who would deal with any infestation like a third world dictator by eliminating it.

The importance of the debt limit isn’t in limiting government from paying bills. But limiting government in increasing its size, and moving away from its importance of its spending as a driving force in the economy. Future growth borrowed from the bank of China, with the belief that our children will be all too happy to pay these bills, while receiving nothing in return for these payments. Is taxation without representation!

The borrower is a slave to the lender! Borrowing more and more to function as a society, as an economy, or as a government, is just sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

The function of any limit, is to give a warning to the danger of going past your limits, before you even get there, so you can avoid any and all negative consequences for going past them.

Constantly moving your limits, pretending they were always ment to be moved, all because of being ill-equipped to deal with the problem, doesn’t resolve or prevent any problems, nor is it a solution. It is a symptom of the addiction.

Democrats when faced with having to reduce spending on their favorite programs, the project devastation they present, along with some frightful out comes, or some kind of uncomfortable existences, as being inhumane, abusive and uncaring treatment, are the results of policies of the opposition party. Obscuring the facts of finance, that prosperity and wealthy, is never an accomplished goal by being asset poor and mountain of debt rich.

If Liberty is to become extinct it is because the conservationists (GOP conservatives) are not willing to do the hard work, the unpopular work of presenting the arguments in a persuasive way to the public. Only quietly going along, to get along, isn’t governing from the perspective in preserving the constitution for all from all foreign or domestic enemy’s. Compromise isn’t any tool used in making persuasive arguments, but is excepting a more comfortable defeat.

When was an unlimited debt ever the principles of our founding?

Government doesn’t produce anything, it taxes all economic production of the people, and then by definition is a growth inhibitor.

Politically speaking. We must recognize that every dime spent in payment to the interest on our debts, is a drag on future growth, future job creation, future security, future economical innovations, while increasing the size of todays obstacles into impossible ones, for future leaderships to deal with. We today are standing at the generational crossroads, deciding what kind of future our kids will have, or can expect. If we the adults in society or in government, are only interested in working for the extravagances of life, allowing ourselves only to enjoy freedom and liberty. Then we must honestly confess, too our own selfish greed, “That we don’t care about our youth”! What gives us the rights to sell, those freedoms and liberty’s, those God-given rights, that our kids should also be able to expect for themselves, with indifference to enslaving them to foreign banks, and treasonous governments, forcing them to pay for our extravagance of today? The borrower is a slave to the lender! How can we then enjoy our extravagances by selling “Our kids ” and their lives into slavery tomorrow?

Modern third world dictators always use the command and control style of governance in solving a self-made crisis while also reducing any powers that oppose it. The Democrat party, and prehaps some of the Republican party, must see themself’s as the slave masters of tomorrow? By wanting to eliminate all infestations / or opposition to their support of policies like, unlimited debt, and the slow erosion of liberty, their policies only seem to managed the decay, over finding true positive solutions.

When has a Democratic policy, a socialist solution, ever been purposed to the people resulted in a reversal of the social decline within society? Liberal policies have only added to a farther decline. Will the Modern Republican party embrace conservative principles, present them publicly and persuasively, or will they allow liberty’s extinction, by finely drowning it to death, with debt?

Restoring “Balance” The dolphin and the camel story.

Why is the concept or to a smaller degree the definition of “Balance” so misunderstood, massaged, manipulated, distorted, variably changed at will, within the liberal progressive politicians mind? Not to mention any speech where they tend to mention the need for “Balance” while promoting imbalances?

For instance: 50% of the people don’t pay federal income tax! So the other 50% must pay more? The liberal—- it is 50/50 after all. That’s “Balance” is it not?

The mega millionaires and billionaires are all publicly promoting–higher Income tax rates, as a “Balanced” approach to governmental needs. But eliminating waste, doesn’t receive any promotion in becoming a top priority? When all these titans of business have become rich doing just that and using every advantage from government that can be lobbied for. These liberals–knowingly have no earned incomes, will pay no wealth tax (or at the least a taxation of already accumulated wealth, doesn’t exist yet or is actively being promoted out of fairness), they all take advantage of moving income through or past those higher rates that they promote, by the use of dividends, or other tax advantaged ways to lower tax rates for themself’s. In short, they don’t have incomes to tax. They have unearned incomes off of investments from money they have already accumulated. In effect paying little to nothing as a ratio, (income to taxes paid), or amount of wealth they must pay in comparison to possessions accumulated. This is why Buffet will never pay an equal tax rate as all of working America does. So this is balanced?

The cereal criminal (Be they a man or a women) can use a gun against anyone that is law-abiding. Because the concepts of respecting laws, rules, regulations, or even other people’s rights (the right to have and protect your own life or property) isn’t something of worth to them. In this social asylum, the common belief, and trust is in the governmental forced charity contribution of taxation, and redistribution, as the way providing for those in need. A criminal is just the same thing, just taking the power for themself’s to provide out of perceived need. The liberal—- we have to limit people ( law-abiding people) from having, buying, possessing, bartering for, or any other acquisition of any weapon that at least looks violent, scary, or has the ability to shoot more than 7 rounds before reloading. Yet with a spirit of demanding payment, as in forced taxation, to implement such unrealistic rules of self imprisonment, is considered to being a balanced approach to a problem? Limiting good lawful people, depriving them to make the choice of how or when to protect themselves or family members, doesn’t in the slightest way prevent crime. Other wise Chicago would be one of the safest city’s then? When indeed they had more victims of crime resulting in death then the Afghanistan war zone 2012. But then gun control is a good thing…right?

So where is the “Balance”? A criminal (or multiple criminals) can have an AR-15/AK-47 (just to name two types) with 30 round clips and kick your door-in, (in a home invasion robbery). But all that you can have to protect yourself is seven rounds in any gun, as a balanced approach, for being law-abiding?

Liberals stand for every kind of minority group or voter block of the mind numb stupid. Sense the majority of the population is law-abiding, dis-arming them is a priority so to protect a minority, in the name of balance, I guess? Criminals are indeed a minority? Funny concepts, supporting a minority, by bullying the majority. When these same politicians assume power with a vote of the majority. Isn’t that a dog eating tail type of thing?

What happens when the minority becomes the majority and would like to benefit themself’s with the help of the government to abuse the then minority, believing in independence and working to make it so? Government chosing to abuse the majority by empowering unequally so the minority–so this is achieving “Balance!!”?

When I look at all of these kinds of things in this social asylum we live in today. I ask myself where is the “Balance”? All I see is the government getting more and more powerful, and the population giving up more and more power to them willingly. Creating an imbalance? An invitation to abuse? Of course most people don’t even see this happening net alone see the imbalance of it? Because I guess, for the most part they don’t understand the founders of this country and the concept of “Limiting the powers of any government” as the greatest Balancing act of them all in being able to live free.

So if a criminal comes to your door, holding a weapon that holds more rounds then you have in yours. Why would you even try to understand those misunderstood, massaged, manipulated, distorted, and variably changed words and definitions of liberal left? Those words like… Bipartisan, reach across the aisle, negotiate, compromise, or balanced approach, redistribution of wealth, and fairness, the need to compromise, and so the list goes on and on. Not to say…” Why is it I can’t protect my things, possessions or family, with the same weapons that criminals have, or could get? The liberal progressive politicians are genetically geared to the use of manipulations. That is getting you and others to give up the ability to choose for yourself. To then force you against your will in accept something that in any normal persons own mind couldn’t possibly chose for themselves, as being “Balanced”!

It is impossible to evaluated anything to be balanced, presented by a politician who says so, or presents it as being so? Balanced, I’m mean! The impossibility comes when the people expect the “TRUTH”, and a politician presents something different or their version of the truth…. or ”A manipulative LIE”, as true Balance. Then defends and argues with anyone, by pointing their finger at you.. Joe Blow American, who is saying something different. “You don’t believe in balance or fairness then?” Is what the manipulative politician would say.

Evolution didn’t create “Fairness”! God through his intelligent design didn’t completely allow for “Fairness”! The politician is no GOD of “Balance or fairness” either! Here is the PROOF!!!

The dolphin and the camel really do want to be best of friends? But in all fairness, this isn’t going to happen! Like a politician who promises that it could be a possibility to make friends of these odd sorts, saying “Just follow my lead?” We should always be aware of our own limitations, so as to realistically be able to recognize those manipulative lying politicians’ as having the same limitations. At that point, and only then we will have true “BALANCE”!

The problem isn’t in the presentations, or in presenting the impossible as possible. It is in the unrealistic willingness in believing, to be able to change the impossible, at someones elses expense by believing a total lie of…”That it isn’t going to affect you!”. So yes! The dolphin and the camel really do want to be best of friends……. It could be possible for the sake of “BALANCE” right? But if God didn’t provide “Balance to their wishes, and evolution didn’t care enough to allow for balance to exist among these two animals–then why should there be any balance to what is imbalanced already between people choosing to act, lawfully or unlawfully?

The kind of weapon, or the amount of ammo needed in protecting yourself, your property, or other members of family, is determined after the gun battle is over!

If criminals never chose to be criminals, and act within the laws of the land, then and only then we would be balanced, equal, and fair. It is impossible for GOVERNMENT to legislate what is in the minds of people. Therefore impossible to protect all of the people all of the time through unfair, imbalanced approaches of gun control legislation. The faster you all realize this, the closer you get to a balanced fairness.

Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College

 Over 12 people were stabbed Tuesday on the campus of Lone Star Community College campus in Cypress, Texas, after a male suspect reportedly used a small knife, ran from building to building and randomly attacked individuals along the way.

The conditions of the victims are unclear, but four were taken by life flight for treatment, which indicates severe injuries. Twelve of the victims in all were hospitalized and two refused treatment. Witnesses reported seeing students with stab wounds to the neck.

Police got the initial report at 11:15 a.m. A suspect with a knife was reported on the sprawling campus on the Northwest side of Houston and there were reports of multiple stab victims. The school was placed on lockdown. The length of the attack is unclear, but the suspect was reportedly taken down by a student.

@FoxNews: a dozen injured in stabbing attack at #Houston-area college campus http://fxn.ws/10FZW8z

Banning the weapon, any weapon is the legislative easy way out to governing. Banning evil intention is also hard if not impossible to do, without some kind of thought police. But if we had thought police, any brain-dead legislator purposing a weapons ban, should be arrested for crimes against humanity; or at the very least held responsible for future victims of violence at the hands of such weapons, because criminals don’t follow laws or regulations.

It just shows that controlling or banning the weapons of choice, chosen by the criminal isn’t a deterrent to violence. Nor is there any more safety to our collages or students that go to them. To then glorify the need to control any weapon as a way to reduce violence is just not supported by the facts or statics. To use violent acts by deranged people looking for the easiest victims possible, as a way to reduce the personal individual responsibility’s (not to mention your God-given right) to protect one’s self, is by its self an act of legislative derangement.

Our representatives should use common sense over that of a knee-jerk reaction to remained popular, or maintaining their electability. After all they protect themselves with armed guards or police officers. Why then should the citizenry be reduced to a second class importance with their protection over violent people doing violence against them?

Clearly a weapon in the hands of any individual then possesses the power in that situation, to use it for good or evil, to use it in senseless acts of violence or putting an end to them. I seem to remember that every act of violence ends 100% of the time with a weapon in the hands of a good person willing to also use that weapon against violent perpetrators of crime, risking personal injury to themselves for someone else’s safety.

Banning any weapons in the hands of the people; expecting them to protect themselves until police officers arrive on the scene would be just as deranged as to expect police officers to go weaponless into the same situation to disarm the perpetrators. Clearly our legislators wouldn’t allow themselves to have unarmed police officers as their protection detail, even after, should they ever become successful in banning weapons?

So the theory becomes fact! A weapon in the hands of a good person doesn’t create future victims. But evenly distributes, balancing the power in the struggle for the ultimate power between the would be victim, and the deranged violent person.

Third world transformation of the USA

Do you remember just what was meant when Mr. Obama said? “The transformation of America.”?

 Update Houston; an assistant U.S. Attorney who has been prosecuting 34 members of the white supremacist Aryan Brotherhood has suddenly announced he is withdrawing from the case because of what he called “security concerns.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jay Hileman didn’t say what those concerns were.

But a friend of his – who happens to be one of the lawyers for the defense in the case, thinks he’s probably worried about his family.

If government employees are in fear of doing their jobs, of prosecuting the worsted of the worsted in criminals because of personal threats, or “security concerns.” then where do all of the citizens of this country stand? How is it possible for the government to protect us?

I’m personally tired of the government or their spokes puppets standing at the podium and calling for new gun regulations, like back ground checks for the law-abiding citizen who wish to purchase a legal and 2nd amendment protected gun. Not that I’m against regulation, but what I’m against is an increase of regulations, and over regulation, like that of also implementing a national data base that can and more than likely will be abused by government at some point in time in the future.

I seem to remember what Washington said of the government, ” It is evil, but sadly a necessary evil.”

The government puppet and chief said the other day (paraphrased) “We need to have back ground checks to make the country safer from gun violence….” They (as in the liberal mind-set) still see the “GUN” as the problem? When the problem is with people possessing a normal state of mind. The criminal element is a small segment of society, which has a false belief in the tenants of unrestrained ability’s in their actions against others.

Think of it–the government thinks it can keep its citizenry safe from all kinds of dangers, by eliminating guns! But the problem is not with the implementation of some regulation/law/limitation. But the problem is with some of the population that will not ever subjugate themselves to following laws, and regulations of the land. Who are these people? How will the government best control these people, while protecting the freedoms and liberties of the law-abiding? There isn’t any population testing available in make any determinations, who will act within the laws of the land or who will not, until a law is broken?

In third world country’s law-abiding people are in-between a rock and a hard place. The government who makes the laws and the criminal elements who act with little concern for them. In this update from Houston, it shows that there is fear within the government legal justice system, whose job it is to in force the laws of the land. But violent criminal elements are acting out to intimidate the system in their favor. Stories like this are all too often recurring in any third world country. Google any third world country, and see for yourself. Of course you will also see that in these country’s people have lost their rights to protect themselves, depending totally on the government. Would you trust the Mexican legal justice system? Remembering just who has the weapons, and who does not have them, and whether the government is or isn’t corrupt. Does it surprise anyone why people come across the border illegally into the USA?

Why would we then trust in a government in this country saying, for all intents and purposes “We the government will protect you.” This same body of political puppets will not protect you by securing the borders, but demands of you to give up your own protection of yourself. Have we forgotten that no one will ever arrive from the government just in the nick of time, just before an act of violence towards you is committed?

It seems we have all kinds of money to barrow, and waste, yet not enough to pay for a super hero like super-man who always arrived in a nick of time, along with his can of whip-ass, as his weapon to swiftly dispensed swift justice towards those armed criminals of the day. Until that day, let the criminal element worry what is behind closed doors? Because it certainly isn’t super-man. With this story out of Houston they point towards a more violent criminal element as being responsible…

“In fact, there are experts who say this looks more like the work of a Mexican drug cartel. But whatever it is, to see this kind of violence happening here in America, it’s like we suddenly woke up in a third world country – except with better plumbing.”

The more we change ourselves into a governmental protected class, the less protection we will have. The more we have politicians espousing the abilities of protecting you so you don’t have to. We will resemble a third world nation where protection comes at a price no matter who’s supposedly offering it.

If the government could protect anyone except from a military conflict of some kind. Why wouldn’t they choose to protect their own employees involved in the legal justice system, from violent crime before it could happen to them? It is hard to ask the government to protect us, when we have stories like this one, which demonstrate they usually arrive after the fact.

What country IS this& http://mynw.me/YVCaFC