Just what is quantifying detached irony? Isn’t that when you present a position on some social issues as being ( right ) over that, of what your political rivals is presenting, only finding out later that your position was wrong instead? For the most part, there isn’t two rights on any political, or moral issues presented in society’s ideology. No matter what’s popular in the day’s conversations, and no matter the subject matter of it. There is all way’s only one right to any issue if it is truth. Remembering that truth has no agenda. So it has no vested interest in proofing any side to be right, only what is to be true!
The media of the extreme left… no wait… that’s all of todays media for the most part. Have only been supportive of extreme positions as values for the most part with any social issues of the day… Today, or at least those in the most recent of day’s. Todd Akin, Missouri senate candidate, said the other day. The most idiotic statements on rape and abortion of any political leaders out there. The media is falling all over themself’s in trying to tie the statements to Mitt Romney and the GOP as being the party of big moral extremists. Trying to take away everyone’s right to do what ever, on moral grounds. They claim. Using the explanation The republicans are only the party of ” NO!” At the same time the democrats promote a life well lived by being irresponsible. Truly, what is irresponsible is at the same time what they’re covering up as the facts of Obama’s abortion extremism.
It seem to be the wild-eye pro-abortion types with extreme views are accepting partial birth abortions, or late-term abortions as something other than what it is. ” Infanticide ” ! They only hope to confuse the issues while dodging the complex philosophical arguments of just when a conceived human being becomes entitled to the same right, not to be killed as the rest of us in society. Reducing or demoting, or covering up the reality’s of the argument as to just what this types of abortions are really doing and to whom. Hiding behind the issues, and arguing it’s nothing other than a women’s rights issue.
Creating the mythology within the minds of the young, that only people with extreme religious morals, or those who also have patriarchal, paternalistic values, or the weak arguments of some white wild-eyed religious extremists. Who would have everyone believing that a fetus is a child. When every good leftist already knows a fetus is just a bundle of cells.
Abortion is one thing if it is done to protect the “health” of the mother. But for the most part the definition or the redefining of it has been left intentionally unclear. What’s the government’s view of what constitutes protecting the “health” of the mother? What is the view of the government? By clarifying what is, or would be threatening to the mother’s health using clear terms, to then prescribe a late-term / partial birth abortions is and should be the governments regulatory obligations. To the left leaning political types this is just a line not to be crossed in the liberal mind. In essence sacrificing one life in order to preserve the other isn’t good enough. One must alow these procedures just by the reasoning of being able to choose it. As the lone choice in justifying it. But then late-term imply’s the baby could at some point survive on its own with the help of modern medicine. It seem, at the point of partial birth or late-term abortion as procedures, this has moved far beyond reasonable insight of enlightenment. We have moved far beyond a bundle of cells, and closer to the mirrored images though smaller, of ourself’s.
Obama’s 2008 endorsement of late-term abortion bans also appeared to be in conflict with his support for the Freedom of Choice Act. In 2007, Obama cosponsored the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would strike down restrictions on abortion at the state and federal level. The bill stated that all abortions must be legal before “viability” for any reason and that abortions must be legal until birth if a woman’s health is at risk. FOCA does not contain a definition of “health,” therefore “anything an abortionist says is related to ‘health’ is sufficient,” according to Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee. “A state would not be able to adopt any limiting definition (for example, defining ‘health’ to exclude emotional distress), because that would be to narrow and infringe on the federally guaranteed right which FOCA would establish. The entire purpose of FOCA is to prohibit any narrowing of the federally guaranteed right — for example, by requiring parental notification, or by refusing to fund abortions.”
Obama even had this to say about the procedure…
There wasn’t any question about what was happening. The abortions were going wrong. The babies weren’t cooperating. They wouldn’t die as planned. Or, as Illinois state senator Barack Obama so touchingly put it, there was “movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead.”
It is no surprise that the democratic party is committed in defending these practices of late-term or partial-birth abortion. Saying as their statement to the facts of any abortions. In 2008, the Democrat Party platform on abortion read this way:
The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.
The key words in this statement are ” We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”
Of course this only possible when anyone that draws such conclusions only has deceived themself’s in believing that human rights come from the state, not from the unamiable rights given by our creator, to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Democrats take action like sen. Reed. As if to say. ” TO YOUR VALUES REPUBLICANS! ” Actions speak louder than words.
At the outward appearances the democrats have given into the detached irony. Democrats don’t recognize the same rights, and have indeed replaced them with more complicated ones created by man, all the while invoking the notion that God is on their side, rather than the side of their political opponents. Yet they don’t clam publicly the true belief in God. Followed by acting like they do, demonstrating this all the while by their half-hearted actions? At the recent DNC of 2012 the democratic party voted to take God out of their platform. But then there was the public perceptions that was building that democrats were the party of the Godlessness. So then to head this perception off they hastily voted God back into the platform. All this demonstrates is that God is nothing more a tool to their political power quest to fool anyone who believes their distortions of political policy’s. ( In all fairness people who also call themself democrats or supports them at the least, also called for the tropical storm Issac to wash the republicans into the ocean. Then these same people got mad at Gods plan when the storm hit New Orléans. )
A president who feels that those baby’s weren’t cooperating with their planed death at the hands of someone else. Must also feel the same way with regards to grown adults planing someone’s elses death? Why draw a line at all? If all we are looking for is coöperation of the victims! Besides a government that places values on its population as being numbered as useful vs. less useful so as to apply society’s resources properly. With resources being stretched to its limits with regards to nationalized healthcare ( Also known as Obama care/ Obama tax ). These standards of maximizing resources and redistributing expectations can also be applied to the older people and their preceded value in society. Aren’t they old? Having out lived their usefulness to society as only an increasing cost to the social net? Should those would be victims also coöperate? How far will this culture of death come in search of new victims some day? When all that seem to be reasoned is individuals worth, compared to the over inflated self-worth of those in power?
Radical Abortion Politics – Boze Blog News – MyNorthwest.com http://mynorthwest.com/194/727319/Radical-Abortion-Politics via @mynorthwest
At its core isn’t this social-engineering much like the historical WWII political mindset of the national Nazi party of Germany? Who also placed values of what they saw as who would be useful vs. who would be a wasted effort, a waste of resources. The slippery slope is slippery for a reason….. made even more slippery by detached irony’s?
Thanks to these blog posts and the web page ” Breitbart.com story for the quotes and pictures, and the Boze blog news.