The worship of robust incrementalisim

When it comes to the extreme, and heated, or what one could characterize as being uncivil name calling and rhetoric, it’s usually the Democrat party pointing the fingers at the Republicans. Who just happen to be in opposition to one of their prized political policies. With the Government shutdown, the Republicans have had to endure names like (“Economic terrorists, crazies, tyrants, saboteurs, obstructionists…etc.”).

Orson Welles once said—and I’ll paraphrase—the farther people get from the truth, the more they hate the people who actually speak it.

Often the Democrats explain themselves as having won the election—having done so, that must also now mean that all of the people are now in favor of whatever Democrat policies are in place or even the ones that they can still dream up. Too then stand in the way is seen as being against the will of the people. They willingly wrap themselves up in the mantra of majority rule when it suits them. But under the previous Presidency, G. Bush, the Democrat cattle call was, the minorities need to have shared power, power of their own, or the republicans will abuse them with their power.

It shows the abusive intent of the liberal Democrat to abuse equally so when they’re in power, or in control. They assume control through elections using the excuse of we have a majority. But then are also willing to excuse themselves in abusing the majority in favor of the minorities, using the tactics of superior moral standing. Both sides of the equation in the proses loose liberties and freedoms; compelling some to comply and others are showered with charitable gifts in exchanged for their votes.

In other words, with Obamacare Democrats are quick to say it’s the “Law of the land”. As if laws made by man can’t be changed, exchanges, made new, replaced, or even done away with entirely; forgetting all the while the Democrats evolved stance in supporting changing the “Definition of marriage, or even at one time we had legal slavery.” Laws that been actively lobbied to be changed or have already been changed for the betterment of the nation as a whole. But Marriage wasn’t any law of the land liberals say? But there was some 6000 years of traditional—religious traditions /moral laws. The democrats view seems to have changed– we can’t have laws that enshrine discrimination or bigotry, now can we? An accusation within such an argument, is designed to undermine the opposition—what they are saying is that religious moral laws are supporting discriminations or bigotry enshrined within their moral laws? But is it?

If it is a conservative value, principal everything can be changed, nothing is written in stone. But not so with liberal progressives, or Democrats, now their principles or values and policies, are written in stone. Or so they act as if they are. That’s why the bitter name calling.

Funny how conservatives allow for people to choose for themselves. But the Democrats need to be pushed kicking and screaming into excepting, forced into complying, with the strong handed government using the power of restrictions, regulations, laws, and the fear of punishments, or forfeitures of wealth or personal property, or even imprisonment to get people to comply.

Everything Democrats do is to push an agenda and orchestrate the public into becoming useful idiots, distorting everything to hide the truth, keeping people from making well-informed decisions.

A great example of this is the recent demonstrations of the Occupy Wall Street crowd, or the Immigration rally the other day while parks were shutdown to everyone else, and then the Million Veteran March yesterday; with the Occupy and Immigration rallies, the police and law enforcement were not sent out in droves as they were with the Vet’s yesterday. Why?

I would guess the tactics of the Democrats in power orchestrated certain groups for public opinion, photo opportunities, in order to push their agenda and increase their power over everyone at the same time. Democrat supporters and demonstrators know what the parameters are going into the demonstrations—you don’t have to send out the police other than for show. They know who the players are. They know what is going to happen, because it is planned for, and orchestrated for maximum sympathetic effect.

But with groups like the Vet’s or the Tea-party rallies, the Democrats see this as an assault on their power, not a unified defense of lost liberty’s or freedoms. Who would challenge the majority rule right? But with the Vet’s rally / demonstration the question is what is going to happen—because these people are exercising their rights—Democrats are more inclined ( Because you’re not in control of those people) to send out forces in opposition to them.

The Democrats are no longer doing what is in the best interests for the country using the pillars of liberty and freedom, or the constitution, along with an understanding of the declaration of Independence, to promote individual opportunities by maximizing everybody’s true human potential. Their policies and tactics are ones of destroying, any and all opposition to what they believe to be a moral superiority. In creating dependency, they maximize power and control.

In the public arena it’s not that Republicans are conservatives, or that the Democrats are liberals. It’s not that the Republican Party lines have been hardening and the Democrats lines have become spaghetti soft red lines easily moved as the political wind blows; there are exceptions on both sides. In the public arena, it is generally viewed as an all-or-nothing choice. And why wouldn’t it be? After all of the heated rhetoric, and name calling; if you then make out your opponent to be something like the “Devils spawn”, or sadistically out of touch, how could it then be even moral, in trying to negotiate a solution?  So how is name calling like economic saboteurs, economic terrorists, crazies, tyrants, obstructionists…etc. not harden the political lines? Again would it even be moral in trying to negotiate a solution when you have pushed 50% of the population towards the crises cliff of your own making? What does the breaking point look like when and if a political party wishes to be true to its moral convictions of what is right or wrong?

Wouldn’t leadership rather put their own agenda aside for the sake of true leadership, doing everything in avoiding crises in favor of finding solutions that unite the nation positively. Before doing such damage to such an extent where the nation becomes united in your political destruction?

“Terrorists,” “crazies,” “tyrants,” along with lies, distortions, and man-made-crises, in addition to spending vast sums of borrowed money; these are, the new religious weapons of robust incrementalisim worshiped by the ruling class, which exchanges the ideas of freedom and liberty with chains of slavery.

Honor Flights dishonored by Mr. Obama.

Just after the government shutdown the national parks department what could only be speculated on were on orders from the oval office itself, then blockaded the WWII memorial. What is to be gained by apply political pressure to what everyone seems to refer to “as the greatest generation”? On Tuesday an Honor Flight of World War II veterans arrived to visit the memorial erected in their honor. For their service, and sacrifice to this nation. But these now old men and women arrived to see blockades erected to an open air outside memorial, effectively keeping them out to receive the honor bestowed on them by the government of the United States while they were yet still alive to enjoy it. For many of these vet’s it would be a trip of a life time, perhaps the last opportunity in this life time?

What kind of government instructs a national park service to blockade the WWII memorial? What sadistic person would decide to abuse old people in this manner? Not to mention veterans that at one time were asked to run head long into enemy fire without question; only now to be used as useful political pawns when they’re on their last journeys in life?

These kinds of trips mean so much to these people, their stoic views as they look onto lost memories and lost buddies, those quiet gazes, contemplations, those tearful observations, those untold sacrifices both physical and emotional. Then to hold at arm’s length away their memories hidden deep within unspoken thoughts quietly displayed within an escaping tear rolling down their cheeks as they would while looking at this memorial is an unforgivable abuse.

The motives and motivations of these disciples of destruction within our government, those very people who would decide not allowing the vet’s to be alone in the memorial, after they took it upon themselves to crash the gates. Ok crashing the gates was a kind of over statement, but then that was Tuesday. Wednesday the park was instructed to make a more permanent blockade–to wire the steel gates shut. Why would this administration ratchet up the force against old heroes, and rhetoric in the marketplace of ideas?

They themselves have been quietly clamoring to avoid the crushing effects of socialism under Obamacare. After all the divided power of the government is distasteful to Mr. Obama who in the end demanding that he and he alone will decide. Who will be placed under the law, who will be left to comply too it? Who will pay the price for standing in the way? Unfortunately that leaves the WWII vet’s smack dab in the middle of a political fight as pawns.

Imagine for a moment, this administration found it more important to protect the WWII memorial from its veterans of that Great War in their closing days of life, with more man power and force, then sending ample men and equipment to protect the embassy and our ambassador in Benghazi. All over Obamacare; a law that has fundamentally changed America from full-time employment being able to pursue happiness, to part-time employment with diminishing happiness; in short it is a job graveyard—R.I.P. your hours, your dreams, your coverage, your memorials, and your service.

Just one of those do-it-yourself healthcare cures.

In the age of Obamacare and the exploding costs of medical cures, both the medical industry and the government oversight committee in charge of holding costs to a minimums, may just as likely be looking into the practices of “human probiotic infusion, fecal bacteriotherapy, stool transplant, or Fecal transplants” as one treatment with a high degree of success? Fecal matter occupies a gray area being neither drug nor device or tissue, so why would the government or individual alike latch onto this treatment? Cost of treatment vs. success of treatment.

Even when the professionals, gastroenterologists and alike are asked about human probiotic infusion as a treatment to try instead of surgery: Their noses get all screwed up like a seven-year-olds may get when smelling a rank fart in a confined area. Their thoughts may  or may not be expressed out loud to you, but they are still thinking, “But it’s putting someone else’s pooo inside of you!”

Once people get past the gross-out factor, medical professionals and the industry alike may relax the scrutiny of the procedure and the scarcity of it may slowly disappear as it becomes mainstream in treatment of Crohn’s, C. diff, or ulcerative colitis?  On the other hand as a low-cost procedure and a high probability of success claimed by those in the business of offering such treatments, the government may embrace it, or even counterfeit the research in making it more favorable solely as a cost savings to their social liabilities of signal payer healthcare system (aka. Obamacare.)

In a hospital setting, the transplant is often performed with colonoscopy equipment, to infuse the sample as far back in the colon as possible. But as you can see this requires what is considered a surgery by insurance companies and therefore a considerable cost to the procedure. Cha Ching! Is the sound heard in the governmental regulators mind, whose job it is to control the escalating expense. In other words, its big bucks, spending it could be avoided all together.

Under an era of cost savings it may become a do-it-yourself cure promoted by your loving government healthcare provider. The personal more accessible option is to simply use an enema bottle. (The smaller size, I keep hearing: goes a long way.) Because of e-coli concerns I would venture to guess, the FDA’s recent decision to regulate fecal transplants as an investigational new drug, has brought a treatment which was on a trajectory towards mainstream acceptance—temporarily—hard to get in the US.

There has been talk about developing a pill form, for the treatment of such cases. But as usual if people know what they’re about to swallow just amounts to purified crap, the wrinkled screwed up facial expressions may be permanent to such an extent that even Botox can’t cure.

The most problematic thing about Obamacare for me is. Not being able to talk things over with a doctor who has his wagon attached to your decision based on his sound advice–that best suits you and your health concerns.

Instead Obamacare turns over the responsibilities to other agencies, and individuals, the gears of bureaucracy in making all sorts of your decisions for your health. Who needs a president who promises “changing the country fundamentally”, and keeping him for life, when the bureaucracy built out of social engineering is forever?

The treatments presented in this post are factual indeed, no less factual as the lies and distortions in Mr. Obama’s presentations and defense of his beloved “Obamacare”. His stubborn stance over the government shutdown, not even wanting to negotiate with the GOP, all the while giving exemptions, wavers, or subsidies, to avoid the pain of having to except for themselves the painful effects of the Obamacare law while demanding the people to comply to it, is my objection!

Obamacare is an excrement sandwich being forced down your throats against your will, as the cure-all to all of your future health needs. But when the tape worm eats up our free-market economy and the government can no longer barrow new money from the bank of China, are your decision for your healthcare also going to be limited? Will you beg your government to be able to go to the hospital for treatments? Or, out of cost savings, or the reduced value to the society because of your declining age, will you be left with seeking some Do-it-yourself therapy?

Just one of the many thoughts you all should be thinking when the USA happens to be following in the footsteps of Great Britain’s health industry, where it is rationed. The fact that social medicine doesn’t work the world over has got my hyperhidrosis working overtime.

If every human life is a masterpiece, a novel, a work of art in the making and shaping of our lives of our own design, than you define your own legacy every day; it should also be by your own decision on how you treat it at its end. In the pursuit of happiness somehow I have failed to see the part where we must ask government for its permission, while crossing our fingers behind our backs. I would rather fight an insurance company–I can at least sue them.

With the government bureaucracy….I hear daemons laughing–then ordering. “Take two pills…”