God’s of “Chalk” dressed in black.

Judge Howard M. Shore’s courtroom seems to be full of ceremonial vandals, people dressed in black; these days Judges seem to be attacking our constitution from the bench. Attacking the very foundation that was to be one of Governments most precious founding principles, empowering individuals to have and to enjoy freedom, with no fear of governments taking away their God-given rights, in addition to enjoy their lives with limited government.

Today the trial began in the case of a San Diego man who is being charged with 13 counts of vandalism for writing anti-big-bank-slogans with water-soluble children’s chalk on the sidewalk outside of three Bank of America branches in Mid-City.

Judge Shore granted a motion to prohibit Olson’s attorney from mentioning the First Amendment, free speech, free expression, public forum, expressive conduct, or political speech during the trial. Judge Shore ruling sighted a state “Vandalism Statute” that apparently does not mention First Amendment rights. Judge Shore apparently places his judgeship’s power, as a gift given to him by the state government, as being greater in this case than to the federally guaranteed constitution, and bill of rights. Individual rights like free speech; whether this free speech is expressed in words out in the open, or in public, or expressed in a non-Permanente medium such as words written in chalk, was not his place to place judgment in the way as he did ordering the exclusion of the terms–free speech, free expression, public forum, expressive conduct, or political speech during the trial.

Judge Shore’s mind-set had already decided sidewalk chalk is far to dangerous of an expression to allow it to continue. Over looking that it was written on a sidewalk owned by the public, not by any person or corporate entity. He could have just as easily laugh at the case and then thrown it out? You know…using some common sense?

Let that sink in for a moment. You can burn an American flag; march with signs expressing the death of a sitting president (at least this was the case while President Bush was in office), or make movies of the same, no matter if you’re expressing yourself by the written word or in pictorial, you can attempt to shut down a privet business by protesting it–shouting at customers as they attempt to shop there. But Liberals count that as free speech / freedom of expression / or an artistic expression…etc. But should you use water-soluble chalk that can easily be washed off of any side-walk, using words against a Bank who received government bailout money in order to survive, well that’s considered unacceptable or vandalism; a type of “Vandalism” worthy of stripping the freedom of expression, and free speech from those who choose to use chalk as their medium at least?

What is next? Are children playing with chalk on city sidewalks now having to answer to the law? Will we need to re educate them to proper sidewalk chalk usage?

In this nation where the use of chalk on the sidewalk is now being considered as “Vandalism” and having the potential and possibility of punishment, perhaps a prison sentence? Our nations leaders are now seemingly becoming energized with a zealots zeal to protect the public  from itself while preserving their own power,  yet they are paralyzed to engage in deportation proceedings of an illegal alien caught sneaking across our countries boarders. Refusing to see that the publics safety is being placed at risk, at the same time acting as if chalk writing is the end all in public risk?

I wonder what would happen to any illegals, if they chose to express themselves against deportation in chalk? Prison sentences? Or an offering of a wet-nap napkin, so they can clean their hands and be then sent along their way?

Where is the common sense in all of this? What is potentially more detrimental to society…chalk…or spray paint vandalism, or ________? (You can fill in the blank)

In another case, Mackinney v. Nielsen 69 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir.1995), a court ruled that use of chalk was not considered vandalism. The law was later changed to define vandalism as defacement “with graffiti or other inscribed material.” Chalk fits this perfectly? Considering it disappears with rain, or man-made rain. Wouldn’t you like it if Graffiti would disappear off your building, homes fencing so effortlessly, so easily? Damn Chalk! Someone needs to make a law?

Liberals didn’t like the outcome of that case so they changed the law. The law now so vaguely defined that children using chalk to make hop-scotch squares to play could be considered criminals, menaces to society, or vandals depending on the definitions of the offended. Written words shouldn’t be considered “Graffiti” simply because someone disagrees with those words and their meanings, even if they are written in chalk claiming defacement of property. With no difference in degree of defacement to how hard it is to clean up, but defacement the same, akin to someone using spray-paint to Graffiti someone’s building or egging someone’s property, or toilet papering someone’s house, yard, and trees?

We are slowly becoming a society where common sense is going extinct within the legal systems judgments, causing a rapid erosion of our rights guaranteed by our founding as God-given. These same rights aren’t being upheld or protected at all costs by our government or its legal system, but now are openly attacked. We are seeing the constitution and the bill of rights actively vandalized by black-robed political activists, using a majority rule mentality and personal interpretations of the founder’s intent. Politicians and judges are shaping public opinions according to their social engineering models within their own minds. Their decisions seem to be in line with political acquaintances, friends, partners, and co-collaborators, and the religion of populism. Whose God and goals and worship seem to be unfettered power for themselves. In other words, “Tyranny”! Tyranny is never experienced by those in power. So the powerful embrace tyranny as the means to stay in power, to remain above the law, beyond having to comply too it, permanently positioned as if they were God’s of society that can do no wrong.

To these power-hungry people, the written word of disagreement in chalk or on any sidewalk, billboard, or even books, must be stopped at all costs. What must be stopped is instead, people who would hold the constitution in the same light as being just as easily eroded away and destroyed, as chalk words on a sidewalk during a rain storm. Because it opposes their demand for the public to worship, to comply to “Tyrannical leadership”.

You can read more at…

Chalking the plank: Judge won’t allow bank protester to claim first amendment rights, by Dorian Hargrove, http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/news-ticker/2013/jun/25/chalking-the-plank-judge-wont-allow-bank-protester/, @SDReader

Burning candles in the wind—GOP eroding faith

To those of you who believe in a government made of two parties with separate and different ideas and principles; that at their core they are supposed to also get along with each other, to compromise values and principles for the sake of getting things done? You are living in a dream. That is no government that represents different segments of society, beliefs systems, political views, or even states issues. It is akin to why we fought the revolutionary war in the first place– to rid ourselves of a KING and allow for the greatest amount of liberty for all, given to us by GOD!

“Let’s have a new first party – a Republican Party – raising a banner of bold colors, no pale pastels. A banner instantly recognizable as standing for certain values which will not be compromised.” – Ronald Reagan, 1975

“While I myself am a registered conservative, I look to the Republican Party as the closest representative of conservative values in American politics. Overtime, that appears to be fading. Sometimes I look at Washington lately and I wonder.”– Quote Shawn Hannity

It seems that there is a policy gripping the electorate of today that is inspiring the belief, “You must go along in order to get along”. This kind of policy is completely at odds with freedom and liberty. It hands over all control to few people with like-minded views. A command and control style of government, after all who will determine the “get along” part and enforce the “must go along part” if not a King like power?

To the liberal mind the use of government in their favor isn’t forced control, so it isn’t seen as some forced compliance to a power. At the same time they would use the systems of liberty and freedom, free speech and alike to gain power. Once in power though those tools are no longer useful and become too dangerous to be allowed.

Republicans at their core should be opposed to such governing. They should present bold arguments to the people so they are able to look at the contrasts, the differences between these two political standards. Instead they see short-term political successes and lust after that success. They are willing to forfeit their bold colors to duplicate that success for themselves by following the Democrats advice and models. For the GOP this demonstrates that they have lost faith in their founding principles. They see power slipping away from them and so embrace the “political life-line” made of smoke in a failed attempt to rescue themselves from losing sight and faith in liberty and GOD given rights. The GOP is willing to slit their wrists, by watered down policies they embrace and birthing version of the Democrat policies as their own. As the republican self-inflicted suicidal wounds bleed potential votes they don’t even see liberty fading away and the need to protect it by standing in the way of Democratic managed decay.

Where are the leaders of tomorrow that prize lady liberty, who would be sworn to protect her, not for personal benefits, but for future ones?? Who will boldly point towards the Democrat policies, deceptions, manipulations, and corruptions that represent virtually every antithesis of the conservative principles: Big government, lack of freedom, invasion of privacy, increased taxes, harms businesses, higher costs with worse results, more government dependency, less innovation, more regulations.

Is it possible to distinguish one party from the other. Like two bold colored candles burning together, slowly melting into one. though their rhetoric seems partisan and different it is drowned out by deceitful actions that are nearly impossible to discern one from the other. With the melting of those two candles one light is being extinguished as they melt into the same pot of power. No longer two separated ideas with their own principles willing to stand firm for what they believe in.

I call out to the Republican party first and then to the rest of you, what man or women is going to allow lady liberty to be turned into some whore of tyranny; who of you would hand to their future kids the principles of compromising national security by refusing to defend liberty politically here at home? Who of you are counting on renewed leadership between the melting pot of leaders of today and those mythical future leaders you all point to in hope of finding “them” that would lead rather than to cower in the shadows?

So what are you going to do about it?

“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”.

“War is Peace, Knowledge is Ignorance, Freedom is Slavery”. “1984”

We started a “War on Poverty” in 1965; there are Millions more in poverty today than back then.

We started the “War on Drugs” in the 1970’s.  Hundreds of thousands have been killed or jailed, and there are more drugs in the US than ever before.

We started a “War on Terrorism” in 2002″ and terrorists now control more nations than ever before.

In 2009 we started a war on the “Greedy rich”, those corporations, company’s and the greedy bankers at its center of this new religion of greed. Looking for a government to tax the greed out of them completely. Yet we now have an even larger government, an ever increasingly greedy population of citizens, followed by an ever-increasing greedy politician in office legislating the new rules, regulations, definitions and laws to deal with the world of greed, resulting in its magnification within society. At the same time protecting the endangered species, the greedy political official looking for reelection.

We started a political war on “Women” in 2012. A politically created division within groups of people and their genders, all of which are now competing for preferential treatment by governmental policies. Showered with money and attention, bought and paid for by a newly protected group, a societal superior, over every other voter group. I suppose we could just call it a forced evolution, a survival of the fittest, that has all ready prostituted itself to government which controls the nature of evolution in the first place. Today the war on women, tomorrow the war on the planet through the use of global warming??

In 2012 we also started the war on “Offences”;

Obama’s quote…..”there is no future for those who choose to slander the prophet of Islam.” President Obama said in a speech to the UN.

Because Islam and other religious and non religious groups are easily offended. We must use governmental controls of what is and what isn’t offensive, ( political correct terms that is). Of course while outlawing offences of the smallest kind we tend to offend the people or groups of every kind, who would also express an opinion of their own. Because these opinions are still offensive to others. In stead of peacefully agreeing to disagree, they only express disagreement.  saying Marry Christmas shouldn’t be so disagreeable, but to an overly sensitive person who also is an atheist? This is too much! To the terrorist who wishes to wipe out the infidel by blowing them up along with himself in order to gain a place in heaven surrounded by virgins. Wether it is agreeable, or disagreeable, or offensive to either side, even to those who must die or to those who must stop the madness, we shouldn’t be slandering the islamic prophet / religion? Wouldn’t this be showing preferential treatment for one religion practices over the others, no matter how misguided it seems to be, by allowing venomous reactions without outrage against such, is itself offensive? Would we not then be offending the Grim Reaper or death itself by defending life through modern medical practices or techniques? All that has been accomplished in the war on offence is an ever thinner skinned population competing for their group to be recognised in gaining approval, offensive superiority supported by the laws of the land.  Of course to the anarchist this is also offensive, to have laws, net alone a government who would in force them.

When it comes to the war on offence, it is a lose / lose proposition. Offences survives on either side of the coin. Prehaps we should abandon our war on offence and go straight for the new war on WHINING! Eliminating that, could resolve things that the weak-minded can’t, who use being offended as their weapon of choice, trying to gain control over you and your actions, in limiting reactions or choices, at the very least, by whining about everything.

Early in 2013 we now have renewed the war on guns. After 20 kids got killed by some crazy gun-man. Not to make light of the tragedy of what was the sandy hook school massacre in new town CT. But banning a gun does little to nothing in changing the mind of the criminal who has chosen to do evil. Besides, why is it now proper for the president and government to wage war on the gun after 20 victims? Where were these wizards of wisdom in the Chicago wars? The casualty’s in 2012 in Chicago have surpassed the death toll of Afghanistan. When the president says. ” We must try to do something, even if it stops just one person from being killed.” Yet with a philosophy of stopping just one more needless death, should the population be limited in its freedoms, and rights? Or is this just a price to pay to be living in an uncertain world, where nothing is guaranteed? Autos kill far more people than guns, no one is banning the use of autos. Drunk drivers kill even more people than the proclaimed “One” by the president. Should we re-ban alcohol? How about the parking lots at the bar?

When we look at the statistics last year we had 11,000 gun related deaths, down from the 20,000 plus gun deaths in 1980. The ratio of volume of weapons vs. deaths by weapons is in decline, as is the case in the statistical evidence in the state of California. Gun bans don’t work! Because it only regulates the law-abiding citizen, not the lawless citizen who doesn’t follow laws. With 1.4% of gun victims last year coming from the weapons government is now trying to ban, it seems out-of-place, or is this just the beginning of what will be the slippery slope to an out-right total gun ban?

It seem in order to protect this society from needless deaths at the hands of criminals who by their nature doesn’t follow any laws, or rules of conscience within society. Would be a waste of resources if we don’t engage the true source of the problem. It would be better to have a war on the mentally ill, or at least people who are weak-minded or have a lack of morals. Maybe movie makers, or video game makers, is what we should be warring against because they should have a bigger responsibility to society. For they influence the weak-minded? After all, the movies, and TV, and video games have become the advertisements of violence that may entice weak-minded people, in acting out with violence. Advertisements do work in getting people to act, other wise companies wouldn’t spend millions of dollars each year on them. If there is a marinade of violence on the weak-minded like this, wouldn’t that also be a problem? Every mass-shooting has found that the shooter to have a fascination with these kinds of entertanments.Treating the weak-minded / mentally ill with dignity and respect in helping them is far better, then limiting the law-abiding citizen as if they are the danger to society. If we chose to bathe in a sewer, should we also expect an improvement just because we using the excuse ” we used soap!”??

Aren’t all these wars “For the good of the people, to keep them safe and secure, even from themselves”?

Truly, we are living Orwell’s nightmare.

Debt limits slavery. A Hope for a change.

Friends, politically independent, or Republican’s a like, we are faced with even bigger problems politically speaking then arguing with our political opposition, over policies, and the preserved impact on society.

How can we wake-up our fellow country-men from the very things that threaten our country independence? Like uncontrolled spending, unlimited debt, unwilling attitudes to overhauling the tax code, overlooking the need to remodel our social net, and no new bold policies that will promote growth without also adding to the cost of overhead within the economy. Just to name a few. All of which threaten future job creation and economical growth.

Sadly. We can shout from our soap-boxes on every street corner, on a daily basis, and will we ever get through to people? Until the average American receives pain personally within their lives, they will continue to close their eyes and just vote, hopefully continuing to receiving some crumbs from the political table. Our government-run by the opposition party (the Democrats) will abuse this mind-set to its full extent, to satisfy their lust for total power, while also destroying the GOP at the same time.

As long as our neighbors continue to see the sun rise, and their groceries stores…. with full shelves of every kind of products, gas-stations… with gas at some reasonable price on every corner, and the common belief that government will save them if they lose their jobs or choose not to work at all. They will never entertain the need to change for what they have come to see and believe as nothing but working for them?

Unfortunately America has become fat, dumb, and spoiled, as well undisciplined crybabies!

America does have addictions, and those who are mostly addicted to an extravagant life style of debt will continue to believe that they are writing the script of how life will be for them in the future. Refusing to see the need to save, and control what they have saved, all to be able to retire comfortably or to buy materialistic things at some point free from the fear of the repo-man. They just continue putting it all on credit. Their foolish foolishness has sown the seeds of false impressions, believing that they are wealthy. But they are NOT!

Democrats often refer to America as the wealthiest nation on earth, promoting the policies that only will continue to barrow money without end. Giving the impression that we can barrow endlessly. But this is nothing short of being unrealistic, using words as an addict would as they play mental gymnastics on themselves justifying irresponsible actions, having yet accepted that there are any problems.

So when will this country have to withstand the perils of insolvency, riddled with debt, paralyzed with political stupidity, and everyday life becoming an unrecognizable pain to endure? If not in our lifetimes, in our children’s then? When will we see a need to change present course of actions?

Perhaps when insolvency creates the first bit of unrecognizable pain in our lives, there will be a ground swell of public outcry, telling our politicians….. “STOP SELLING OUR SOVEREIGNTY TOO FOREIGN BANKS, ON OUR WAY DOWN THAT SLIPPERY SLOPE TOWARDS LIBERTY’S PERIL?”

When will we all be united with crystal clear knowledge, lessons learned from our own stupidly mistakes or the graduates course  from the college of hard knocks; “That the borrower is SLAVE to the lender?”

I have a bone to pick with FACEBOOK!

                                 I have a bone to pick with FACEBOOK!

Yesterday November 13, 2012 I was picked on by the mighty FACEBOOK. I got upset to a point of just typing without rereading what I had typed. My apologies to everyone for that, and for having to read my ramblings riddled with misspellings or sentences that were run together, or some such. Again My apologies for the confused writings.

In case your late to this game, Facebook took it upon its self to “BAN” me from being able to friend anyone I know, or otherwise, for 7 long days. Well it is now about to become 6 more days anyway. I know it is a small thing, but then the slippery slope starts out that way every time. At the bottom of that slope is a collection of shell-shocked people asking the same question? “How could this have this happened?”

My offence to receive this kind of punishment —- Asking someone to be my Facebook friend.

Seem harmless? After all I’m harmless, and those who have taken the time to get to know me will testify to that. But asking someone to be a Facebook friend isn’t allowed unless you know them personally. Banning people that Facebook doesn’t know or have taken the time to get to know or investigate their high crime of trying to friend someone is ridicules! Facebook programmers have devised a program to get to know me and my acquaintances better than I know myself I guess? Or they have set up a social system of complainers to weed out those of us who would like to be socially inter-active with life, and people using social networks like Facebook or twitter…. etc.

To receive this kind of ban from Facebook you have to do one or all of the following:

1)      Ask someone to be a friend on Facebook. Even though it is a person’s free will to accept that invite. They then can choose by making efforts on their part to press a button in acceptance, or to ignore the request, or to block people who are making unwanted or repeated requests, as well as make a complaint about repeated requests made. Note pressing any button takes the same amount of effort on anyone’s part (Little to none). If you’re a complainer, and don’t wish to interact with me —– Strap a head to toes condom on yourself and consider yourself protected from hear no evil and see no evil from me! Holding your breath at the same time isn’t necessary, but feel free if you must!

2)      If you make too many requests of any amount of people to become a new friend or a request of family (People you actually do know), within the course of a day (A 24 hour per day time frame). This will trigger the program to potentially block you from making new requests. Facebook doesn’t know who you are. Nor do they know who you know, or don’t know. It is all about learning about the people that use Facebook, and building a person’s profile by how they use it. So this has nothing to do with anything that I or you have done wrong according to some socialist rules that they have you agree to, so you can use Facebook properly.

3)      If anyone makes a complaint about you (Warranted or not) the program kicks in and takes action. For me it was blocking me, from making any more requests for friends. The first time this happened to me, I was new to Facebook. I made 15 requests and was deemed, not have that many friends (A programmer’s way of calling me a loser) and was blocked for 4 hours. This happened to me just 3 days into being on Facebook. The next time it happened to me, I had made a request of a person who made some opposing points to my posts. They weren’t my friend, and I didn’t complained. They commented on my story that I had posted. They were intelligent and I thought it would nice to discuss other points of view with them in the future if they were willing. They complained to Facebook about what must have been an unreasonable offensive request, and I was blocked for a second time for 12 hours. The next time, I had made only 10 – 20 new requests of people that had 30-140 friends in common with me. I also had people make some friend requests of me during this time and gladly accepted their requests. This pushed me over the programmer’s threshold of the number of requests that anyone can make or accept so it seems in a day / 24 hours’ time. I know, how dare I!!! I was ban for 7 long days. (Note; how the periods of time and being ban is inconsistent with anything realistic, times or number of offences vs. the accusations of unreasonable offences made.)

4)      Anyone that is making a complaint to Facebook seems to be of a greater importance to Facebook then actually looking into any potential problem with its users (like an habitual complainer). Think about it, how many people do illegal things and are still on Facebook without being ban, or arrested? The news is full of such stories over the years.

5)      My second banning was due to this situation as I will explain. The person didn’t like being challenged to his utopian world of liberalism. Rather than coming up with better intellectual arguments and making a civil presentation of them. This person who seemed was intelligent to me, just when to the itchy trigger finger and shot a round of complaints to Facebook. After all how can only one complaint coming into Facebook trigger such a reaction by Facebook towards me? We wouldn’t expect them to over react with a ban of some kind over just one complaint, right? Maybe a warning first? But not the kill shot, for requesting some new friends?

6)      Facebook refuses to correct the hair-trigger stance of how they deal with complainers and those who they complain about. It is their opinion to shoot first, and then repeat the proses if needed with a greater wound to your social networking experience. They (Facebook) do not have any intention to investigate any complaint at all. They know that fighting with a computer program is futile. We really do live in a sy-fi kind of world, where computers can deem us an enemy of friendship, free speech, or political correctness. How do we fight that? Feeling like a number rather than a person with feelings right about now. Aren’t you?

Who enters a social networking party room without expecting to also being social with people in that room? Did we not enter that room with our own free will? So we can leave that room then of our own free will, if it isn’t as expected. Who sits on the outer edges of that room wishing to interact but then has to ask permission to do so from Facebook? I’m not in favor of harassment of people and their ability to inter act no matter what their opinions seem to be. But I’m not in favor of some kind of social networking social engineering of society either. No matter who may be behind it!  We are no idiots here in the social networking world, except for the habitual complaining ones. It would see this kind of abuse of people for practically doing nothing, is also unacceptable, abusive, insulting, and most of all a promotion of an anti-social life styles limited to those views of the social engineers among us.

Facebook is in the world of electronic censoring, information gathering, and learning of its subjects. (People and their actions, observing why they chose to act like they do). People are the ones being studied, observed, by Facebook. The only questions that remain to be answered are, why? What is the end game and for what purposes?

I have been often been told. Do not talk to strangers as I was growing up. But then everyone is a stranger in life if you don’t also make an attempt to communicate with them.

My only offence here on Facebook is being exactly what Facebook was created for. BEING SOCIAL!!!

I must then presume that Facebook doesn’t like my politics, religious beliefs, or my supporting others in theirs. For just one complaint (If I choose to play Facebook’s game of blame) is a bit too much of a hair-trigger to then ban people in this way. Not allowing a defense of one’s own actions, or to view (in E-mail form) their offences of others, is all on its own offensive! I’m innocent until proven otherwise! Don’t you ever forget that FACEBOOK!

Next, where is the system of protecting me from chronic complainers or other ill willed individuals, and the actions of any perpetrators of crime, or harassments within Facebook’s world against me or others? Who defines the word net alone who the perpetrators of offences really are? Or are you ( FACEBOOK, and your programmer’s) living the life of a hermit’s, who are also computer programmer’s? Hiding behind your mother’s dress, like a scared little kid, who just saw the friend request from under the bed? Presuming the one who cry’s wolf most often is the one worthy of your misguided attentions within the big bad world of social networking?

I would therefore under normal conditions expect an apology from Facebook. But let’s face it; Facebook is nothing but a computer program created by a bunch of faceless people, who never think so much as to investigate their product from flaws within. Like design flaws! Your system always advertises new people to me by saying, and displaying on-screen. “Do you know these people? They then display (some number) of friends in common with you, along with a request button and ignore button. What the hell is this? Do you (FACEBOOK) not understand your own rules? The ones that you also make me agree to before I can be a user in good standings again? That one in particular where I seem to having a problem with you —- WHERE NO ONE IS TO BE FRIENDING ANYONE WHO THEY DON”T KNOW! You may love the power to be able to choose for me, but you, yourself don’t know me! How would you? You’re just a computer program designed to spit out what the little programmers told you to. You know… garbage in — garbage out. On the other hand if I press a button and by doing so request friendship on Facebook I’m “BANED” from the full use of Facebook. Now what is wrong with this picture? Why do I need to subjugate myself to your determination of just who my real life friends are? Why do I need to be tempted to make new friends with people I may or may not know of your choosing, against your rules? Are you the DEVIL?

Last I checked, I didn’t sell my ability to make friends, or give you an accrete list of current friends, that may interact with me. If we can never expand beyond our current friends lists, why would we need Facebook anyway? There are things of somewhat older technologies just like Facebook. We call them “Cell phones”! What’s the point then? It is you’re job in keeping Facebook relevant in the world of social networking where all people start as strangers, capable of deciding for themselves who should be their friends while using social networking? I or all the people on Facebook don’t need your permeation to do that for us!

7)      I all most forgot. Number seven, the exponential growth of friends on my page. Facebook is making an attempt at controlling growth or so it seems the growth of like-minded people on my page as well as other pages, who may read like-minded stuff. Over 25% of the people on my list of friends are due to people making requests of me and my excepting of them. Some of which came to becoming a friend with my request of new friends that I may or may not know in my real personal life. All of which seem to have happened in the last 10 days. I personally am grateful, humbled, and have the biggest amount of gratitude for that. I indeed have a great collection of principled people who I gladly will call Facebook friends.

I however will not be controlled! My life or on the acting out within my life other than how I choose to live it, and who I choose to share it with, is for me to decide for myself.  When my actions haven’t harmed anyone and my words haven’t supported the harming of anything. My religion beliefs or politics as presented is harmless in comparisons to those religions groups and Politian’s who support — terror, fear, manipulations, and distortions, or flat-out lies! All for the purposes of gaining power over people, myself included. I therefore cannot and will not agree with your baseless BAN!

I will not submit…… I will never, ever submit!!!!!!

I’m personally grateful, humbled, and have the greatest amount of gratitude for all my friends. I fully respect your privacy if you desire it, and have no intentions of ever setting out to hurt anyone who I may disagree with or who disagrees with me.

Thank you all for that great growth of friendships and the ability’s to have found you all on Facebook. You know just who you all are. True friendship will never be denied, compromised away, or left behind willingly by me! Unless I get a personal request to do just that from you.

Facebook you cannot stop what is happening in social networking after you open Pandora’s Box by claiming to have invented it, for the purposes of people being able to stay in contact with each other! For that is the base line and the beginning stage for forming friendships that last.

All the best.

CYA SOON ON FACEBOOK!!

Alternate reality of political correctness.

Within the alternate reality world of the liberal left. Political correctness, is only one of the tools to be found within the tool box of forced results. Untill it becomes necessary to use the only other tool within the toolbox. THE POINT OF A GUN! These left minded people rarely use their right mind in anything. So they are by definition half-witted.

Take religion for instance. The liberal tosses moral values to the wind, and settles into the redefining of what is to be popular. Presenting the popular point of view for the new moral. If you disagree look to the values that are being supported present day Democratic party. One may even look to the values of the president of the United States. He claims to be Christian but acts like he has a favored spot in his heart for the Muslim Islamist’s of the world. Is this attitude, the fundamental change, his platform of hope and change was built on? But then he believes that no body can build anything without government first building the roadway and bridge to no where. Which is where the government seem to be pushing Christians and their religious beliefs towards.

We have come to a point of not being able to trust him ( Obama ) and the judgments he is making on our behalf. Net alow his word. He is as it seem to be, a first third world president of the United States of America. Concerned more with being a compromise-er with an overly friendly nature towards everyone else in the world. He compromises his presented moral standings, or what faith he claims for the moment. No matter what intent he may have. He has failed to understand the Islāmic faith vs Christianity.

To govern this nation you have to leave your personal beliefs at the front door of the office. There is no room for expressing personal beliefs, without giving the impression of governmental support of them. Without offending still other beliefs and believers. Therefore no need to insult this nations over whelming belief in Christian values. All the while over looking the almost daily threats from the Islamist extremest, towards every religion in opposition to their own beliefs.

Like supper man he ( Mr. Obama ) fly’s around the wold chastising behaviours for something that rubs him wrong. Apologizing still to others for something he didn’t create, and then coming home he criticizing for all the intolerance he sees, while pushing the immoral political correctness.

Obama is not just the first black president. But the first third world president. Who, when ever he steps out on the world stage seems to have forgotten where he has come from, and where he is going. Claiming to be christian. But forgetting his muslim up bringing. Offending one, while apologizing still for the others offence. In so doing Obama has lost personal popularity, as well as American popularity, among the Islamists of the world. Not to mention the respect as well.

By his display of weakness, he has lost every kind of popularity and respect, faster than Gorge Bush did. Even faster still among the world of Islam. Because they despise weakness, and are all to willing to exploit it.

Despite the God-given right of the FIRST AMENDMENT. Along with the superior moral values within the constitution of the United States of America. These documents given all of us the same abilities, to the same kind of free speech as anyone else in this country.

Obama uses his own moral judgments to engage within negotiations along with Islāmic nations. Using the United Nations ( UN ) counsel of human rights in trying to curb our ( USA”s ) freedom of free speech. By limiting what we can say or even criticise, with regards to Islam. Without even asking for the same kind of compromise and controlled speech of the muslim nations, and what they say towards other religions. Clearly Obama doesn’t see the real differences between Islam and every other religion. Islam feels that their God is more powerful than Christianity’s perceptions of who, and what God is, or is like.

Did he fail to lessen to the president of Egypt when he said.

” The Quartan is the constitution! The prophet is our leader! Jihad is our path! Death in the name Islam is our goal! “

or at different times other Islāmic leaders said.

” We love death more than you love life!”

Despite all of this Obama said in an apologetic way.

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” Obama at the UN

Liberals have attacked conservatives and constrictive minded Christians. With self blinding cliché’s of some self-proclaimed superior emotional ideas. A progressive moral code. using political correctness as the weapon of choice. Showing us all, that they are nothing but old musicians of the past. Trying desperately to hang onto lost fame of the past. With their past memories still fresh in their minds performing their one hit wonders, to what now is only an empty arena of intellectual ideas. along with a child-like attitude. They paint unrealistic dreams of their fathers lost glory. Like a pot smoker under the influence. They weave yarns of smoke into the foundational fabric of their socialist utopia. Marching forward, towards their social engineering of their choosing.

These disciples of destruction Believe they, and they alone deserve to be in the rightful place of leadership. They try to negotiate with the Islamist world what would be acceptable as what is and is not free speech. Despite the first amendment. They subjugate Christian values and morals as being ones of a lesser importance in comparison to muslim values. Yet say nothing when women’s rights are violated, when Christians are being killed, persecuted, or thrown out of Islāmic country’s. We say nothing when muslims arm themself’s, and attack with suicide bombers. Attacking women and children because they happen to be jewish. Or other people who express beliefs in opposition to Islam or Sharia. We say and do nothing when Islamist leaders call for genocide to be preformed against Israel. Yet we fool ourself’s into believing that progressive values are far superior. Rather then recognising progressive morals as being socially suicidal in nature.

When will we admit to our self, then to the world. That any religion that also promotes violence, engages in violence, and teaches hate of others because they dare to believe differently, and then acts out with violence on that teaching, as being a false religion!?

Why can we not express to those false teachers. That their kind of religious teachings do deserve a future that is comfortable with ours? Nor should the future belong to those who slander, using hate of Christian / Jewish / and other religious values. When will any American leader stand up and deliver a speech using terms as forcefully as possible explaining our values of being a Christian nation, as one who has a GOD given powerful right of free speech? So put a sock in it!!

When have we seen or heard. “The future must not belong to those who slander the tenets of Christianity! ” ?

Yet the news if full of stories of rioting against innocent people trapped in poverty, unable to escape the insanity of religious persecution. By a religion that has turned its back on free choice, and replaced it with an over abundance of fear, violence, manipulation, distortion, lies and lairs. Who promise any of the would be suicide bombers with a fantasy of 72 virgins, as their 30 pieces of silver.

When will we accept that Islam doesn’t want peace, they want victory!!! A one world religion governed by Sharia law! A heaven built of men, not of GOD!

When will our leaders get it? We don’t want ignorance bottled up in righteousness. The chronic political correctness, which leads to an accommodationist style and type of leadership. A compromise-er! An alternate reality where Christianity isn’t worth defending. Out of some misguided guilt, willing to embrace Islāmic seeds of destruction. In exchanged for bucket loads of money, constantly shoveled into the middle east in an attempt to pay the devil in buying our way to heaven. these acts of misguided charity clothed in misguided support of human rights. Is the self-deception, the false religion of where everyone will go along, to get along. In the end forgetting that true principles and morals are timeless.

We ( As a nation and more importantly our government. ) must see what our enemy’s have been all to willing to tell us openly. The who, and what they are, as well as what they intend to do. Only then we will be able to defend ourself’s if it need be. With the appropriate amount of force. Therefore understanding Islam and their religious extremism within the muslim off shoots that exist today. Not as a religion, but as a religious command and control theocracy, bent on world domination. One compelled mind at a time.

” It requires to correctly identify your enemy’s and what they intend to do. But in your arrogance you believe that you write the script, but you don’t!! “ Lara Logan.

This guy explains these differences without mixing word: http://youtu.be/GCXHPKhRCVg

Arrogance will blind you from seeing what is so openly in your face. The future must not belong to those who slander common sence, and refuses to see the alternate reality of political correctness. Religious ones or other wise.

A narcissistic ego; Never letting a crisis go to waste. ( the YouTube video that no one has seen )

“Never letting a crisis go to waste.” quote Rahm Emanuel. Is the presidents motto for his reelection. When you also look at his own speeches you would also find. Another one of his mottos. If you don’t have a record to run on. You give something of your opponents to run from. Is the crisis in the middle east one of those moments in time?

This YouTube video that sparked the outrage in the middle east is somewhat over done. Not saying that the riots are outrageous by themself’s. But saying, what do you expect from a society that is totally controlled by a theocracy. Along with the limitations of the state-run by abusive powers, and thus limiting the theater-goers as well as the theatrical presentations within the country’s of questions.

This video is therefore suspect to have caused the riots. The limited viewership of some brief showings to the hollywood movers and shakers. Is one thing. But for these some backwards country’s and their leadership to have allowed the YouTube released to the general public is highly unlikely. Even if we were to play along as being devil’s advocate. The question that comes to mind is what about all of the other hollywood movies that shine an unflattering light on Islam / the Muslim world? Where is the out rage?

These country’s are poor country’s and receive a lot of foreign aid just for everyday survival. Throw into the mix high unemployment, radical religious views and the facts that within these theocracy the population gets most of its news and how to react to it if any, from the mosque and the cleric who teaches there. How else would a country like those in the middle east riot with huge populations of rioters, who seem to not mind to rioting for the camera. Just where are the theaters that had the showings for these people to see this movie. Where is the evidence of huge numbers of broadband internet mobile devices where these people can see the outrageous video? Have we forgotten the Iranians crack down on the social media networks when there were anti-government uprisings within that country? In Egypt during the muslim spring, the outgoing government even tried to shut down the social media networks at that time. These theocracy’s control content because they see the western life style presented in movies and videos, or everyday life as a threat to the religion of Islam and its life style. Why else would they refer to the USA as the ” Great Satan “?

As devils advocate again; If this YouTube video that no one has seen. Can then spark such violence, why not with the speeches of Obama and crew. Who mentioned no less than 21 times during the DNC the killing of Osama Bin Laden being one of their greatest achievements? Seems riot worthy when you consider the chanting rioters in Egypt were shouting “Hey Obama, we are all Osama.” Could it have been…..?

For the administration to then go out on the limb and say it was this YouTube video as the culprit to all of the unrest is just a political smoke screen. Even these liars of olympic stardom and fame can see that the numbers don’t figure. With limited opportunity’s to see any videos like this one net alone limited internet access. Weather it is limited by the theocracy style government or other wise. How is it possible? But then these wizards of smart seemed to have voted on Obama-care. No one even admitted to having spent the time to have read the 2700 page bill. At least there is similarity, and consistency’s. You can get people to do something without the participants even have taken the time to look into the possibility’s of fact or fictions. Throw into the mix, a perceived attack on religious beliefs and you got nitro style volatility.

Yes content can be controlled by governments of all types. Like the way Google does but more compleat in its entirety.

Google Blocks Anti-Muslim Movie From Stirring More Protests http://huff.to/RRb4aV via @HuffPostTech

This gives you a clear view at the President’s narcissistic ego. Blame any one and any thing. Mix in some half-truths, along with some total lies and presto! A president who could have just as easily ben the cause, having just washed his hands of all blame, and cast blame to some religious Christian trouble maker on YouTube. Shining some of his own lime light on a new enemy of society. The need of controlling YouTube / free speech!

Like I said, Barak Obama taking credit for killing Bin Laden without any reaction from the middle east, or at least no one in the middle east is admitted to that being the reasons for their actions. At the same time Barak Obama taking credit for killing Bin Laden would be like Nixon trying to take credit for the Moon Landing. A fulfillment of feeding the narcissistic!

When you Also consider, in Egypt last week, the crowd was shouting

“Hey Obama, we are all Osama.”

One is lead to question it all in its entirely. Along with the movie that director Kathryn Bigelow, of the movie fame the ” Hurt locker ”  is making for the administration. High lighting the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Yes the same hollywood movie that was to be released during the months of September or October this year. Just in time for the election spot light to be shining a positive light on some accomplishment of the president’s administration.

But then we have this reaction in the middle east. What to do? Is the narcissistic ego’s of this administration going crazy right now? Or are they quietly telling Hollywood to stop with Islam bashing, or we will have to control every movie you make? Its more like Making a run, finding reasons to limit free speech for everyone. The opium of the narcissistic socialist, self admitted drug user. After all Obama said. ” That’s the point! ” Okay. You caught me. Obama said that to a question asked of him. ” Did you inhale drug smoke back in high school? ” Obama answered. ” That’s the point! ”

Any way you slice it…  Is it the never seen video clip.. the constant beating on his chest, ” I killed Osama Bin Laden.. or the quote of the narcissistic mind-set, ” That’s the point ….Never letting a crisis go to waste! ” Answers it nicely. Its more of an end around to taking away of our free speech, all the while adding to the perception of weakness perceived by our enemy’s. Treating one religion with kid gloves. While also beating up the religions in this country for what they believe.

Have you ever seen two bully’s take each other on? Only when they have run out dividing up the weak people or organisations. At that point. Yes. To Islam we are the bully’s. To anyone who can yet see. Radical Islam is the religion of bullying.

( Picture was an AP picture within the post from the new york times story mentioned in the link, in this piece.)