Hillary gets $225K for a U of Nevada speech in which she talks about…the heavy burden of student debt. Shameless. http://t.co/sTkYJYn87J
Talk about the war on women. The progressive liberals have given us the feminist movement and the glass ceiling–in general the claim that men have miss treated females for their own gain, or pleasure. Feminists have gone so far as presenting a false narrative of a “War on women” with regards to abortion issues and a woman’s right to choose, as well as other issues. When talking to stanch feminists, usually politically affiliated to the Democratic Party, there seems to be a hatred of men, in general expressed by their rhetoric. They say they would like “equality of the sexes”, yet hammering away, working towards superiority. Using big government as the advantage, the tool, in order to get it, government becomes our Hotel California, (You can check in but you can never leave) the product of our own devices, a reflection of our own slavish selves, a barometer of our own corrupt depravity.
What seems surprising in some high-profile cases, women that are perceived to be in positions of power, like Hillary Clinton, and her best friend Huma Abedin (Anthony Weiner’s wife) are also engaging themselves in political prostitution. At the very least, supporting the willful, deliberate, and stubborn acts of scumbag men, engaged in carless somewhat abusive acts against women. Escaping criticism or being called out for using women as playthings, door mats, belittling them and their existences along the way. Living the stereotype life of the feminist’s complaints from the past.
After losing his job as congressmen, claiming to have kicked the habit, then restarting it again; All the while expecting his wife to stand by her poor choice of a man, yet despite all of his public flaws presenting him as being the best thing since sliced bread…. there stands Anthony Weiner disgraced former Congressmen.
Former Congressmen Anthony Weiner stubbornly stays in the race to become NY city mayor. Anthony Weiner admits to sending more lewd images, texts but vows …
Weiner’s wife, Huma Abedin, told reporters that she loved her husband and had forgiven him.
Why? But had she really? Or had she accepted an open invitation by marriage, accepting, and endure such deliberate behaviors from her husband, for some future considerations of getting her own slice of money, power, fame and fortune, for all the abusive humiliation suffered? How is this empowering, a positive position or positive role model for young women? In essence Huma and Hillary have allowed themselves as a role models; to encourage other young women to a life of servitude, to serve a man in order to gain things, not based on their human potential, talents, personal merit, or ambition, and the ability to work hard in order to get it. But value based on sexually being objectified, sleeping your way to the top with a powerful man, then having to play a part in the impending cover-up.
Is this what women burned their bras for in the 60’s, in support of the feminist movement? Just what does this say about women in this position and their values systems, those values that not only support substandard men into political office, but then don’t even consider that these men will run the country just like they run their personal lives and marriages–without any moral standing.
It proves my point that liberalism supports any depravity for personal gain. It is why liberal Democrat politicians who are caught in some kind of immoral dilemma are unaffected for the most part; depravity equals a résumé enhancement. Perhaps this is the long-term goal of Huma Abedin? Sheepishly standing in public, trying her best in hiding the humiliation of being used, objectified, and embarrassed for and with others for nothing other than a role of being a personal play thing, while hiding those foot prints on her back as Anthony’s uses her as a stepping stool? Why else would anyone endure such harsh slaps of realty not once but…? By standing by his side claiming forgiveness while living the hell she personally has chosen for herself, she is just calculating on how to capitalize on her husband’s depravity as they both move up one run on that powerful political ladder?
In Anthony’s case he uses deceptions, and manipulative misdirection to gain forward momentum. In Huma and Hillary cases each of them excepted being used, exploited, expecting a win-fall for publicly endured abusive humiliation. Perhaps a political career like in the case of Hillary, or who knows what the end game is for sure?
The war on women isn’t just being able to choose, yes, or no, on abortion at 20 weeks of pregnancy, or arguing who will buy birth control? The war on women is in the degrading use of them, while searching for power. The question is, why is the Democratic Party so accepting of degrading women, using women, objectifying women, wiping their feet on their women’s backs as they step up the political ladder, all the while expecting wives to act as political prostitutes in delivering false support, and reports of why their husbands though flawed, are the perfect candidate for the job? By saying, “we have worked hard with lots of counseling and we have put this behind us now.”
It proves the point, that democrats don’t have any intentions of allowing themselves to be measured publicly for success or failure on values, principles, policies, or moral grounds, but only on “Good Intentions.”
Because the highway to hell is paved by good intentions, political prostitution and the leadership of the Democratic Party and their good works projects, bought and paid for– increasingly by borrowed money; at some point our national debt will be that bright sign on the side of the road held by some if not all Democrat politician’s wife’s that reads “ WELCOME TO HELL HAVE A NICE DAY.”
On Wednesday 12/13/2012, singer Harry Belafonte offered some friendly advice for Barack Obama while speaking with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. In his view, the president should rule like a third world dictator and throw the GOP in jail for opposing him.
“That there should be this lingering infestation of really corrupt people who sit trying to dismantle the wishes of the people, the mandate that has been given to Barack Obama, and I don’t know what more they want. The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a third world dictator and just put all these guys in jail,” he said.
Mr. Belafonte must have never hear of limited and separation of powers and a limited government? A representation by the people who voted for their representatives in government. The left loves to say. “Elections have consequences.” Until they have to live with the consequences of any elections they disagree with.
I suppose the left has forgotten that in 2010 the people voted overwhelmingly to control spending, by limiting government, as why the GOP Tea party won overwhelmingly in the house of representatives. Now these same people are called “obstructionists” by the liberal left. Liberals are forgetting facts of truth totally, offering complaints to them, by saying that elections have consequences, but refusing to see the election results in terms of people speaking to their political leaders, over that as being only a win or a loss in any election.
In America we don’t elect a dictatorship ( a winner take all, completely unopposed power, a situation in having to accept only the winners policies). We elect officials who hopefully have the ability’s to perswade people to see their points of view, and then voting on those points. Not to drag people, kicking and screaming, in excepting or invoke political policies of crisis, or manipulating people in selecting only from these solutions of more spending and borrowing. What is said to be those same failed solutions of uncontrolled government, that only seems to lead to an even more manipulative or uncomfortable life, within an identical crisis to the past.
“Nothing is accomplished in facing tomorrows responsibility’s, by refusing to act on todays responsibility’s.” unknown.
Doing the same things over and over expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
To call your political opponents obstructionist because you dislike their politics, or at the very least, want them to compromise their principles, is just using a dictator’s vision,” In order to get along, you must go along.”
One man’s obstructionist is another man’s conservationist. Who would be working to protect against socialist dictators using command and control style governing as the only option. The left seem to be using crisis, or the creations of them, to increase the need for government to take power and liberty from the people, thus killing the future needs to vote on issues. After all if you don’t support winners policies then you are an obstructionists to them, all because elections have consequences you know?
Using the terms of……. “Elections have consequences.” never seem to sink into the liberal mind, when they have to deal with a loss of an election. Funny that the left then also starts to use terms like “obstructionist” in describing someone who is doing their job, according to the people that voted these politicians into office. Liberals tend to overlook that there is more to an election year then who won the presidents office.
When that doesn’t work they seem to use stronger terms like Mr. Belafonte used, “Infestation”! So when Republicans or Tea-party people were elected to office, charged with doing the job as the people’s representatives, in stopping Obama’s reckless policies, they can now be considered to be an “infestation” in government. The descriptive nature of these words and others, describing your political rivals as being the problem, while hiding the true nature of the problem, is governing through fear. Because words have meanings the word choice is interesting, since one normally deals with an infestation by eliminating it. Can there really be any room for compromise, or honestly any bipartisanship, or a willingness, for these opposed powers in working together?
Republicans, or Tea party patriots, the faster you realize the facts, that the Democrats are out to eliminate you as a relevant political force, if not totally eliminate you, because you’re position and opposition to their brand of socialism designed for a total takeover, a total power grab through corruption of the election proses. The better you will be equipped with the power to recognize that you and you alone are the last conservationists of liberty, and freedom in America. If they look at you as an infestation, then you can’t ever compromise your principles in trying to co-govern with the enemies of liberty and freedom, who would deal with any infestation like a third world dictator by eliminating it.
The importance of the debt limit isn’t in limiting government from paying bills. But limiting government in increasing its size, and moving away from its importance of its spending as a driving force in the economy. Future growth borrowed from the bank of China, with the belief that our children will be all too happy to pay these bills, while receiving nothing in return for these payments. Is taxation without representation!
The borrower is a slave to the lender! Borrowing more and more to function as a society, as an economy, or as a government, is just sowing the seeds of our own destruction.
The function of any limit, is to give a warning to the danger of going past your limits, before you even get there, so you can avoid any and all negative consequences for going past them.
Constantly moving your limits, pretending they were always ment to be moved, all because of being ill-equipped to deal with the problem, doesn’t resolve or prevent any problems, nor is it a solution. It is a symptom of the addiction.
Democrats when faced with having to reduce spending on their favorite programs, the project devastation they present, along with some frightful out comes, or some kind of uncomfortable existences, as being inhumane, abusive and uncaring treatment, are the results of policies of the opposition party. Obscuring the facts of finance, that prosperity and wealthy, is never an accomplished goal by being asset poor and mountain of debt rich.
If Liberty is to become extinct it is because the conservationists (GOP conservatives) are not willing to do the hard work, the unpopular work of presenting the arguments in a persuasive way to the public. Only quietly going along, to get along, isn’t governing from the perspective in preserving the constitution for all from all foreign or domestic enemy’s. Compromise isn’t any tool used in making persuasive arguments, but is excepting a more comfortable defeat.
When was an unlimited debt ever the principles of our founding?
Government doesn’t produce anything, it taxes all economic production of the people, and then by definition is a growth inhibitor.
Politically speaking. We must recognize that every dime spent in payment to the interest on our debts, is a drag on future growth, future job creation, future security, future economical innovations, while increasing the size of todays obstacles into impossible ones, for future leaderships to deal with. We today are standing at the generational crossroads, deciding what kind of future our kids will have, or can expect. If we the adults in society or in government, are only interested in working for the extravagances of life, allowing ourselves only to enjoy freedom and liberty. Then we must honestly confess, too our own selfish greed, “That we don’t care about our youth”! What gives us the rights to sell, those freedoms and liberty’s, those God-given rights, that our kids should also be able to expect for themselves, with indifference to enslaving them to foreign banks, and treasonous governments, forcing them to pay for our extravagance of today? The borrower is a slave to the lender! How can we then enjoy our extravagances by selling “Our kids ” and their lives into slavery tomorrow?
Modern third world dictators always use the command and control style of governance in solving a self-made crisis while also reducing any powers that oppose it. The Democrat party, and prehaps some of the Republican party, must see themself’s as the slave masters of tomorrow? By wanting to eliminate all infestations / or opposition to their support of policies like, unlimited debt, and the slow erosion of liberty, their policies only seem to managed the decay, over finding true positive solutions.
When has a Democratic policy, a socialist solution, ever been purposed to the people resulted in a reversal of the social decline within society? Liberal policies have only added to a farther decline. Will the Modern Republican party embrace conservative principles, present them publicly and persuasively, or will they allow liberty’s extinction, by finely drowning it to death, with debt?
Ask yourself if this statement is true???
“Despite the strides we have made in this country to try to ensure equal opportunities, equal treatment and equal pay for all, “all” doesn’t necessarily include someone who is gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. We have laws to protect against workplace discrimination—but not on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. In 29 states, you can get fired just for being gay. In 38 states, you can get fired just for being transgender.”
I was told once, “That government is like making sausages. Everyone loves to eat them, but doesn’t want to know what is in them.” This person then went on to say, “It is complicated, running a government, and making laws and regulations that will suit everyone equally, is down right impossible.”
Making complicated things even more complicated, doesn’t solve much. But making things that are complicated less so, does.
It seem that politicians are purposefully making government, and the laws and regulations they make out of whole cloth, more and more difficult to understand, net alone follow? Throw into the mix, the political pundits who don’t understand what government or what the political leaders are trying to do; or is it that these political pundits are just blindly supporting those ideals no matter what, for some kind of advantages unto themselves?
There was this story the other day that stated that people could be fired if you lived in one of these states saying…(a picture was also posted–which I have also posted in this piece), if you were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender and lived in these states you could be fired! Oh no! Often these states are referred to as “Right to work states.”
This term “Right to work”, is being abused. It seems that political pundits are determined to twist its definition and other terms along with it, in a mental no holds barred wrestling match designed to confuse the average voter. Playing mental gymnastics with words and terms or definitions is the kind of word play the progressive left uses to appear superior to everyone. It is just the kind of tactic used, no difference in explaining that government is like making sausages.
The truth of the matter is, the truth is never really explained or presented with these word game–wrestling matches. These games are easily debunked within the issue when the lies and distortions are pointed out. For instance the following definitions and facts do matter. The right to work states laws are stated as….
“Right to work” laws govern hiring of employees. In a nutshell, “right to work” means that a person has the right to work for a company without being required to either join a union or financially support a union. Basically, if you live in a “right to work” state, joining a union, or paying union dues, can’t be a condition of your employment.
“Employment at will” means that either an employer or employee can end a working relationship at any time, for any reason, with no notice. No matter how hard you work, if you upset your boss, no matter how small the incident, you could be out of a job.
The only exceptions are that employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation. That means that discriminatory firings (age, sex, religion, race…the usual suspects) are still illegal in “employment at will” states.
So how is it possible to get fired from your job if you are–gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, when employers can’t fire anyone for reasons protected by federal legislation?
I don’t believe this is an issue of equality. I do however believe it is an issue of gaining superiority.
When political pundits add pictures that are for the most part visually dishonest, distracting from the truth, or facts, and the population is over-run with political lies and distortions. The 30 second sound-bite, or an attractive picture, seems normal to most voters that also don’t take any time for themselves to search for the truth, or use common sense to say the least in exposing the political lie. Throw into the mix the successful augment that “If you’re against something, you are also cold, un-caring, cruel, less charitable.” as the new way in building the superior argument, or presentation.
The point of the matter is if it takes lies, distortions, re-arranging definitions of words, untrue acts, or actions, or reactions. in order to manipulate people into excepting something that is inferior, how is that being superior, or even supporting something that is defined as superior? The truth doesn’t need the support of any distortion, or lie, to make it so. The inferior does!
I’m amazed that there aren’t more people that are willing to call these political hacks, or pundits, what they are! “LIARS! LIARS! LIARS!”, and then some?
It isn’t that I have an ax to grind, these issues of being gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender doesn’t affect me personally. But those political hacks or pundits who are trying to bury common sense with BS will effect 100% of everyone. I believe in supporting the truth, regardless of the axes people grind!
Workplace Discrimination « Give A Damn http://www.wegiveadamn.org/issues/workplace-discrimination/
Do you remember just what was meant when Mr. Obama said? “The transformation of America.”?
Update Houston; an assistant U.S. Attorney who has been prosecuting 34 members of the white supremacist Aryan Brotherhood has suddenly announced he is withdrawing from the case because of what he called “security concerns.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Jay Hileman didn’t say what those concerns were.
But a friend of his – who happens to be one of the lawyers for the defense in the case, thinks he’s probably worried about his family.
If government employees are in fear of doing their jobs, of prosecuting the worsted of the worsted in criminals because of personal threats, or “security concerns.” then where do all of the citizens of this country stand? How is it possible for the government to protect us?
I’m personally tired of the government or their spokes puppets standing at the podium and calling for new gun regulations, like back ground checks for the law-abiding citizen who wish to purchase a legal and 2nd amendment protected gun. Not that I’m against regulation, but what I’m against is an increase of regulations, and over regulation, like that of also implementing a national data base that can and more than likely will be abused by government at some point in time in the future.
I seem to remember what Washington said of the government, ” It is evil, but sadly a necessary evil.”
The government puppet and chief said the other day (paraphrased) “We need to have back ground checks to make the country safer from gun violence….” They (as in the liberal mind-set) still see the “GUN” as the problem? When the problem is with people possessing a normal state of mind. The criminal element is a small segment of society, which has a false belief in the tenants of unrestrained ability’s in their actions against others.
Think of it–the government thinks it can keep its citizenry safe from all kinds of dangers, by eliminating guns! But the problem is not with the implementation of some regulation/law/limitation. But the problem is with some of the population that will not ever subjugate themselves to following laws, and regulations of the land. Who are these people? How will the government best control these people, while protecting the freedoms and liberties of the law-abiding? There isn’t any population testing available in make any determinations, who will act within the laws of the land or who will not, until a law is broken?
In third world country’s law-abiding people are in-between a rock and a hard place. The government who makes the laws and the criminal elements who act with little concern for them. In this update from Houston, it shows that there is fear within the government legal justice system, whose job it is to in force the laws of the land. But violent criminal elements are acting out to intimidate the system in their favor. Stories like this are all too often recurring in any third world country. Google any third world country, and see for yourself. Of course you will also see that in these country’s people have lost their rights to protect themselves, depending totally on the government. Would you trust the Mexican legal justice system? Remembering just who has the weapons, and who does not have them, and whether the government is or isn’t corrupt. Does it surprise anyone why people come across the border illegally into the USA?
Why would we then trust in a government in this country saying, for all intents and purposes “We the government will protect you.” This same body of political puppets will not protect you by securing the borders, but demands of you to give up your own protection of yourself. Have we forgotten that no one will ever arrive from the government just in the nick of time, just before an act of violence towards you is committed?
It seems we have all kinds of money to barrow, and waste, yet not enough to pay for a super hero like super-man who always arrived in a nick of time, along with his can of whip-ass, as his weapon to swiftly dispensed swift justice towards those armed criminals of the day. Until that day, let the criminal element worry what is behind closed doors? Because it certainly isn’t super-man. With this story out of Houston they point towards a more violent criminal element as being responsible…
“In fact, there are experts who say this looks more like the work of a Mexican drug cartel. But whatever it is, to see this kind of violence happening here in America, it’s like we suddenly woke up in a third world country – except with better plumbing.”
The more we change ourselves into a governmental protected class, the less protection we will have. The more we have politicians espousing the abilities of protecting you so you don’t have to. We will resemble a third world nation where protection comes at a price no matter who’s supposedly offering it.
If the government could protect anyone except from a military conflict of some kind. Why wouldn’t they choose to protect their own employees involved in the legal justice system, from violent crime before it could happen to them? It is hard to ask the government to protect us, when we have stories like this one, which demonstrate they usually arrive after the fact.
What country IS this& http://mynw.me/YVCaFC
Ass, Gas, or Grass, nobody rides for free.
Yet Obama and the dim wits of the Democratic Party support this kind of social abuse of the population with their branded social engineering. Wind power or solar power isn’t cheaper or even competitive with the old fashion oil & gas. These fools of modern failure (Mr. Obama and crew) are actively in support of something that is more expensive, inconsistent, and responsible for slowing the growth of the economy. That’s not also saying that it isn’t also a total waste of taxpayer’s money and efforts in earning that money, it hasn’t had an effect on the economy and the creation of new jobs…. thus new taxpayer’s. In short, an alternative energy plan reduces the standards of living for all, including the tax revenues to the government having borrowed the money in the first place, that now has become a great big liability. Nothing but a lose, lose, lose kind of plan to becoming a loser! That’s why BP is getting out of the wind energy business. The easy money made by fleecing the American taxpayer and now it is time to go.
It looks like the oil company BP, known for its slogan “beyond petroleum,” is going back to petroleum and selling off its wind business.
“What a shocker? BP recognizes that investments in wind energy are increasingly unwise,” Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an email. “Without huge government subsidies and strict mandates, wind energy cannot survive.”
ATTLEBORO, Mass. (MyFoxBoston.com) – It seem that butter knives are just to dangerous in the hands of school age children who don’t know better. But then recently in the light of political correctness, other stories have boiled to the surface of our modern asylum. Stories of the boy who got in trouble for throwing imaginary hand-grenades, killing imaginary villains of the world; because he thought of himself while playing an imaginary game of the mind, as imaginary super hero saving the world. Are we now killing the inspiration of any future super hero, who may also see the need and have the willingness to save us from ourselves?
Boy, 7, suspended from school for throwing imaginary hand grenade http://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2013/02/06/boy-7-suspended-from-school-for-throwing-imaginary-hand-grenade/
Have we forgotten that schools back in the olden days taught to imagine, to dream, innovate, invent, while providing inspiration, and encourage students who would guide us all into the future? All sorts of modern products and devices were the result of such an education. Schools should then be dreamland’s of sorts, visionary zones?
Instead we have transformed them to become prisons of insanity, devoid of freely promoting common sense, critical thought, and to dream big or go home. The creed of winners! Isn’t that the way to preparation for a changing future?
We should teach to impress, to create an excitement of learning in students, over the false education that these schools of modern age now teach. Today we paralyze critical thinking through the magnification of present dangers, like those butter knives, and imaginary hand-grenades. We inspire as well teach kids to trust teachers and administrators or other government employees, over even their own parents, by confiscating lunches; declaring them not healthy, uneatable, as if loving parents don’t really care? Lessens that certainly can imprint all sorts of fear in the minds of our youth today.
ATTLEBORO, Mass. (MyFoxBoston.com) – From a toy gun to a butter knife, a new controversy has arisen over an item a student brought to a local school Wednesday.
Morgan LaPlaume, a Wamsutta Middle School student, was simply trying to cut her fruit for lunch because she has braces and can’t take bites out of whole fruit, says the LaPlaume family.
During lunch, the vice principal happened to be walking by when he reportedly saw Morgan with the butter knife, took her to his office, and issued her a suspension.
In the land that gave birth of unlimited imagination, the creed of being “all that you can be”, as well as inspirational entertainments delivering new dreams, imaginations, through the stories of “Super Man” and others,( where good always triumphs over evil). Why do our teachers seem to be behind the learning curve? It seems that only in the specialized education systems of teaching the handicap; is where teachers are still teaching the lessons of self-reliance, the can-do-attitude, supporting efforts through inspiration of overcoming obstacles?
Today we create insurmountable walls out of false standards and the fear of bad lunches, butter knives, and the free will to imagine. We have allowed the evil change to take place, of what we once was thought our teachers were, ” the Supper men and women” of education. But now, allowing them to be transformed into the “JOKERS” of the day!
After all what are friends for? A kick in the…? At lest they should posses and present honesty their advice. We shouldn’t expect anything else from them? A true friend would be using, brutal honesty and the power of a friends observations, to help a friend in trouble that they also love. We therefore should expect nothing but honest comments, observations, criticisms, advice, as they guide, support, and commiserate with us in our travels along our parallel life’s journey within this social asylum.
If we take a deep breath, and really listen to what is being said, and quietly taking some time to think… really think about what is being said, instead of angrily reacting emotionally. We may gain some wisdom.
A friend of a friend wrote some profound words, as their observations to what might as well be a doctors prognosis, a temperature reading of a sick social asylum, and the final analyses to what disease we are fighting. With all sicknesses or diseases, the medicine are usually bitter to taste. Prehaps this brave soul, this social MD’s words will help to bring about at the very least a recognition of the condition, as well the stage of the disease, and a willingness to take the bitter pill, over that of just excepting our demise? Surviving any sickness, or disease, requires a willingness to fight it!
At what point is a freedom fighter a social terrorist, an obstructionist, an infectious organism, to the progressive liberal mindset that sits in opposition to the concept of what America was founded upon? What happened to those same concepts of life liberty and the pursuits of happiness, or of individual freedom, and the responsibility’s that go along with it? Why is it, in supporting these things we have been viewed politically as “Obstructionists” when we indeed are nothing but “Conversationist / Freedom Fighters” who would like to preserve America as founded? When did these values lose their luster, or social value, while getting replaced with socialism’s false guarantees? Socialism is birthing the utopia of the mesmerized, envious lazy minded individuals, through its religion of unrealistic pursuits, of equal out comes, and average existences, and misery for all. A managed decay is its only contributions to the world at its very best?
Why have we failed to recognize the failed policies of socialism as our politicians present them to us? When has socialistic utopias the world over ever supported themself’s? They have all needed to be rescued or bailed-out, by free market capitalism in order to continue to exist. For those who believe in the concepts of evolution ( where everything must adapt, and only the strongest will survive) why do we as a people support political failures, or the weakest of political parasitic organisms, where misery is their greatest contribution to their populations and to the world? Why then would we who live in the shadows of such great failures, and misery’s, volunteer to do the same, without much as giving any opposition to it?
There has been no greater waste of resources of human efforts, and charity. Then those misguided contributions, given as emotional gift of charity; in the hopes of helping people while supporting political leaders and their policies that have done nothing but take from the population. Destroying human dignity, human potential, the ability in improving themself’s, or talents, or even their lot in life.
Thanks Mark for passing along this friend of your statements.
He wrote: The American Dream ended (on November 6th) in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled… and developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind. A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union Members, Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell’s America. The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch…the Pit Bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod, along with international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order. Our side ran two candidates who couldn’t even win their own home states, and the circus fattster Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing “post Sandy” tribute that elevated the “Commander-in-Chief” to Mother Teresa status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never again comment on or concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired. You will never again out vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not moderates–not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to “white guilt” and political correctness….. I’m done.
John Huntsman’s daughter is following in her father’s footsteps appearing on MSNBC to rip on Republicans as the “party of no government.”
“No government!” No Republican I’ve spoken to has ever called for this point of view, but some people, or anarchists groups and individual alike, who are also associated with the LEFT have. Are they confused by the concept and the meaning of the words, “Limited government?”
Apparently John Huntsman’s daughter and others alike have no real concept of reality of politics, or differences in policies of the two parties’ either. Because it has been the Democratic Party leadership and political office holders of that same party that constantly say “NO” to what you can have, or not have.
Take for instance; who limited people from buying 64 oz. soft-drinks, sugar, salt, and whether parents should pack their kid’s school lunch for them? How about the gun issue…Who’s in favor of saying “NO”? On ammo and magazine size? On condoms and other birth control… No one should be able to say, “No I’m not going to provide or be buying yours.” so being able to say “NO” to that, is more of the Democrats saying, “You can’t say “No”, but more of saying, “NO” to choosing for yourself! Confusing I know but please follow the questions and which party is saying “No”. Who says “NO” to personal responsibilities of free choice, and rewards irresponsibility? On Obamacare… Democrats said, “No!” to the freedom of you choosing for yourself. On free markets deciding winners and losers, yes democrats said, “No, then go ahead and barrow money from the bank of china to bail out companies that should have gone bankrupt. The list goes on and on, so just scratching the surface on the socialist party of “No” is also magnifying the party that is in favor of bigger government. Now was that the Democrats, or the republicans?
On Illegal immigration the GOP is saying, “NO”! But that means that the Democrats are saying “No” twice as much in related subject matter. “No” to securing the borders—thus national security, and “No” to voter ID’s, to securing our election out comes. Both are related to the immigration issue.
John Huntsman’s daughter goes on to say, Lincoln would be “calling for a debate” on immigration and gay marriage–as though no debate is happening right now. I guess she is adopting the language of the left, which is to call for a “debate” when what you really want is surrender.
Ps. Just a side note; Lincoln was a Republican, who was saying “YES” to ending slavery. The Democratic leadership were not only supporting, but profiting off of slavery, and they said “NO!!!” to ending it. Does it take a war for the Democrats to finally realize that it isn’t good to force people against their will in making a choices, forcing them into something morally wrong? Isn’t it funny that Democrats are now trying to compare themselves to a Republican, as a political party whose policies for the most part is at odds with the Republicans.
Presidential thievery through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices of policies within the sequester is coming to you soon! We must be prepared to act as informed voters to these subject matters. Because acting like A.D.D. voters of the low informed kind, is of no good to the defence of the nations liberty’s.
With the negatives to the sequester looming, how will it affect the economy, seems to be the only debate among politicians? No one is interested in making a real effort in discovering how best to avoid the negatives within the sequester, just the magnification of them. Mr. Obama solution to his created problem seems to be, emphasizing the problems and presenting the other political party in the most negative lime light, through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices. Mr. Obama, who would rather choose to party, celebrate, or vacation, then in finding solutions himself. His offerings, presented to the economic Gods of socialism, inflict maximum pain on the population while common sense is being quickly swept under the rug, hoping that no one will noticed.
Under the flag of procrastination our government governs one crisis into many more. In a blink-of-an-eye Mr. Obama is just now realizing that we have to do something. like a kid who is realizing that he has a science project do in days, and has wasted almost all of his time, finely decides to do something. His reaction; Chooses to blame others for his own procrastination.
A look at the cuts and the chilling impact the administration says they would have on the economy goes like this. Find the most uncomfortable services that the public will most likely complain about and cut them relentlessly….
-Defense: Troops at war would be protected, but there’d be fewer Air Force flying hours, less training for some Army units and cuts in naval forces.
-Health: The National Institutes of Health would lose $1.6 billion, trimming cancer
-Food and agriculture: About 600,000 low-income pregnant women and new mothers would lose food aid and nutrition education
-Homeland Security: Fewer border agents
transportation: Most of the Federal Aviation Administration’s 47,000 employees would face furloughs, including air traffic controllers,
-Environment: Diminished Environmental Protection Agency monitoring of oil spills,
-Labor: More than 3.8 million people jobless for six months or longer could see their unemployment benefits reduced by as much as 9.4 percent.
-Housing: The Department of Housing and Urban Development said about 125,000 poor households could lose benefits from the agency’s Housing Choice Voucher program and risk becoming homeless.
-Not to mention other idle threats made to the citizens of this nation, like Joe Biden who said (paraphrased), “An increase of rape and violent crimes may be on the rise without increased spending on police officers and other public safety services.” As the justification for more uncontrolled, unwise, wasteful spending.
Just a good reason to have control of your God-given rights, and not the government taking them away, like their attempts with the second amendment.
But then we have hostage takers in office, where they would rather take some needed services, placing them in a so to speak head-lock, and placing a gun to those services heads, demand more of the same reckless spending on your children’s credit card issued by the bank of China, or else say good-by to these services!
What kind of politicians uses these kinds of tactics against the people of his or her’s own nation? It isn’t any good long-term policies or of any good for the people. But more bad policies piled up against or upon past bad policies, all the while risking the people’s safety, by the same people, sworn to protect and up hold their safety. In other words, these politicians are threatening the safety because they refuse to do the job of, cutting waste from the government’s budget, in so doing they threaten, instead of protecting the growth of the economy. Cutting the waste out of government or shrinking the size of the same would be limiting to the tax burden on the people, and pro-growth.
There is no differences to our modern-day politicians, and modern-day mugger’s on the streets of Chicago. Everyone knows that mugger’s are breaking the law and acting without human decency, the other uses the power over the people justifying their own actions of theft, through making laws that destroys human dignity, good will, and trust.
Mr. Obama created the sequester, rather than now excepting the blame for a bad policy and idea, as well as acting like an adult person in finding solutions. His actions are that of just implementing political leverage. As the head of the Democratic party, the commander and chief of thug politics, and political thievery, Mr. Obama has shown his true colors of Chicago politics, and corruption of the political proses. Policies like this will only cause the people to make every effort in protecting themselves from the long arm of the government, causing a farther slow-down in the economy at worse, or more of the same at best.
With Obama in office, the people shouldn’t expecting the government to protect the people from the barbarians at the gates, it will be more like….. Pay your toll (higher taxes) for more of the same wasteful spending, or be thrown to the mercies of those barbarians within our gates.