An Obstructionist view to the good, the bad, and the ugly, and modern slaves.

From Examiner

On Wednesday 12/13/2012, singer Harry Belafonte offered some friendly advice for Barack Obama while speaking with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton. In his view, the president should rule like a third world dictator and throw the GOP in jail for opposing him.

“That there should be this lingering infestation of really corrupt people who sit trying to dismantle the wishes of the people, the mandate that has been given to Barack Obama, and I don’t know what more they want. The only thing left for Barack Obama to do is to work like a third world dictator and just put all these guys in jail,” he said.

Mr. Belafonte must have never hear of limited and separation of powers and a limited government? A representation by the people who voted for their representatives in government. The left loves to say. “Elections have consequences.” Until they have to live with the consequences of any elections they disagree with.

I suppose the left has forgotten that in 2010 the people voted overwhelmingly to control spending, by limiting government, as why the GOP Tea party won overwhelmingly in the house of representatives. Now these same people are called “obstructionists” by the liberal left. Liberals are forgetting facts of truth totally, offering complaints to them, by saying that elections have consequences, but refusing to see the election results in terms of people speaking to their political leaders, over that as being only a win or a loss in any election.

In America we don’t elect a dictatorship ( a winner take all, completely unopposed power, a situation in having to accept only the winners policies). We elect officials who hopefully have the ability’s to perswade people to see their points of view, and then voting on those points. Not to drag people, kicking and screaming, in excepting or invoke political policies of crisis, or manipulating people in selecting only from these solutions of more spending and borrowing. What is said to be those same failed solutions of uncontrolled government, that only seems to lead to an even more manipulative or uncomfortable life, within an identical crisis to the past.

“Nothing is accomplished in facing tomorrows responsibility’s, by refusing to act on todays responsibility’s.” unknown.

Doing the same things over and over expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

To call your political opponents obstructionist because you dislike their politics, or at the very least, want them to compromise their principles, is just using a dictator’s vision,” In order to get along, you must go along.”

One man’s obstructionist is another man’s conservationist. Who would be working to protect against socialist dictators using command and control style governing as the only option. The left seem to be using crisis, or the creations of them, to increase the need for government to take power and liberty from the people, thus killing the future needs to vote on issues. After all if you don’t support winners policies then you are an obstructionists to them, all because elections have consequences you know?

Using the terms of……. “Elections have consequences.” never seem to sink into the liberal mind, when they have to deal with a loss of an election. Funny that the left then also starts to use terms like “obstructionist” in describing someone who is doing their job, according to the people that voted these politicians into office. Liberals tend to overlook that there is more to an election year then who won the presidents office.

When that doesn’t work they seem to use stronger terms like Mr. Belafonte used, “Infestation”! So when Republicans or Tea-party people were elected to office, charged with doing the job as the people’s representatives, in stopping Obama’s reckless policies, they can now be considered to be an “infestation” in government. The descriptive nature of these words and others, describing your political rivals as being the problem, while hiding the true nature of the problem, is governing through fear. Because words have meanings the word choice is interesting, since one normally deals with an infestation by eliminating it. Can there really be any room for compromise, or honestly any bipartisanship, or a willingness, for these opposed powers in working together?

Republicans, or Tea party patriots, the faster you realize the facts, that the Democrats are out to eliminate you as a relevant political force, if not totally eliminate you, because you’re position and opposition to their brand of socialism designed for a total takeover, a total power grab through corruption of the election proses. The better you will be equipped with the power to recognize that you and you alone are the last conservationists of liberty, and freedom in America. If they look at you as an infestation, then you can’t ever compromise your principles in trying to co-govern with the enemies of liberty and freedom, who would deal with any infestation like a third world dictator by eliminating it.

The importance of the debt limit isn’t in limiting government from paying bills. But limiting government in increasing its size, and moving away from its importance of its spending as a driving force in the economy. Future growth borrowed from the bank of China, with the belief that our children will be all too happy to pay these bills, while receiving nothing in return for these payments. Is taxation without representation!

The borrower is a slave to the lender! Borrowing more and more to function as a society, as an economy, or as a government, is just sowing the seeds of our own destruction.

The function of any limit, is to give a warning to the danger of going past your limits, before you even get there, so you can avoid any and all negative consequences for going past them.

Constantly moving your limits, pretending they were always ment to be moved, all because of being ill-equipped to deal with the problem, doesn’t resolve or prevent any problems, nor is it a solution. It is a symptom of the addiction.

Democrats when faced with having to reduce spending on their favorite programs, the project devastation they present, along with some frightful out comes, or some kind of uncomfortable existences, as being inhumane, abusive and uncaring treatment, are the results of policies of the opposition party. Obscuring the facts of finance, that prosperity and wealthy, is never an accomplished goal by being asset poor and mountain of debt rich.

If Liberty is to become extinct it is because the conservationists (GOP conservatives) are not willing to do the hard work, the unpopular work of presenting the arguments in a persuasive way to the public. Only quietly going along, to get along, isn’t governing from the perspective in preserving the constitution for all from all foreign or domestic enemy’s. Compromise isn’t any tool used in making persuasive arguments, but is excepting a more comfortable defeat.

When was an unlimited debt ever the principles of our founding?

Government doesn’t produce anything, it taxes all economic production of the people, and then by definition is a growth inhibitor.

Politically speaking. We must recognize that every dime spent in payment to the interest on our debts, is a drag on future growth, future job creation, future security, future economical innovations, while increasing the size of todays obstacles into impossible ones, for future leaderships to deal with. We today are standing at the generational crossroads, deciding what kind of future our kids will have, or can expect. If we the adults in society or in government, are only interested in working for the extravagances of life, allowing ourselves only to enjoy freedom and liberty. Then we must honestly confess, too our own selfish greed, “That we don’t care about our youth”! What gives us the rights to sell, those freedoms and liberty’s, those God-given rights, that our kids should also be able to expect for themselves, with indifference to enslaving them to foreign banks, and treasonous governments, forcing them to pay for our extravagance of today? The borrower is a slave to the lender! How can we then enjoy our extravagances by selling “Our kids ” and their lives into slavery tomorrow?

Modern third world dictators always use the command and control style of governance in solving a self-made crisis while also reducing any powers that oppose it. The Democrat party, and prehaps some of the Republican party, must see themself’s as the slave masters of tomorrow? By wanting to eliminate all infestations / or opposition to their support of policies like, unlimited debt, and the slow erosion of liberty, their policies only seem to managed the decay, over finding true positive solutions.

When has a Democratic policy, a socialist solution, ever been purposed to the people resulted in a reversal of the social decline within society? Liberal policies have only added to a farther decline. Will the Modern Republican party embrace conservative principles, present them publicly and persuasively, or will they allow liberty’s extinction, by finely drowning it to death, with debt?

Advertisements

Third world transformation of the USA

Do you remember just what was meant when Mr. Obama said? “The transformation of America.”?

 Update Houston; an assistant U.S. Attorney who has been prosecuting 34 members of the white supremacist Aryan Brotherhood has suddenly announced he is withdrawing from the case because of what he called “security concerns.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jay Hileman didn’t say what those concerns were.

But a friend of his – who happens to be one of the lawyers for the defense in the case, thinks he’s probably worried about his family.

If government employees are in fear of doing their jobs, of prosecuting the worsted of the worsted in criminals because of personal threats, or “security concerns.” then where do all of the citizens of this country stand? How is it possible for the government to protect us?

I’m personally tired of the government or their spokes puppets standing at the podium and calling for new gun regulations, like back ground checks for the law-abiding citizen who wish to purchase a legal and 2nd amendment protected gun. Not that I’m against regulation, but what I’m against is an increase of regulations, and over regulation, like that of also implementing a national data base that can and more than likely will be abused by government at some point in time in the future.

I seem to remember what Washington said of the government, ” It is evil, but sadly a necessary evil.”

The government puppet and chief said the other day (paraphrased) “We need to have back ground checks to make the country safer from gun violence….” They (as in the liberal mind-set) still see the “GUN” as the problem? When the problem is with people possessing a normal state of mind. The criminal element is a small segment of society, which has a false belief in the tenants of unrestrained ability’s in their actions against others.

Think of it–the government thinks it can keep its citizenry safe from all kinds of dangers, by eliminating guns! But the problem is not with the implementation of some regulation/law/limitation. But the problem is with some of the population that will not ever subjugate themselves to following laws, and regulations of the land. Who are these people? How will the government best control these people, while protecting the freedoms and liberties of the law-abiding? There isn’t any population testing available in make any determinations, who will act within the laws of the land or who will not, until a law is broken?

In third world country’s law-abiding people are in-between a rock and a hard place. The government who makes the laws and the criminal elements who act with little concern for them. In this update from Houston, it shows that there is fear within the government legal justice system, whose job it is to in force the laws of the land. But violent criminal elements are acting out to intimidate the system in their favor. Stories like this are all too often recurring in any third world country. Google any third world country, and see for yourself. Of course you will also see that in these country’s people have lost their rights to protect themselves, depending totally on the government. Would you trust the Mexican legal justice system? Remembering just who has the weapons, and who does not have them, and whether the government is or isn’t corrupt. Does it surprise anyone why people come across the border illegally into the USA?

Why would we then trust in a government in this country saying, for all intents and purposes “We the government will protect you.” This same body of political puppets will not protect you by securing the borders, but demands of you to give up your own protection of yourself. Have we forgotten that no one will ever arrive from the government just in the nick of time, just before an act of violence towards you is committed?

It seems we have all kinds of money to barrow, and waste, yet not enough to pay for a super hero like super-man who always arrived in a nick of time, along with his can of whip-ass, as his weapon to swiftly dispensed swift justice towards those armed criminals of the day. Until that day, let the criminal element worry what is behind closed doors? Because it certainly isn’t super-man. With this story out of Houston they point towards a more violent criminal element as being responsible…

“In fact, there are experts who say this looks more like the work of a Mexican drug cartel. But whatever it is, to see this kind of violence happening here in America, it’s like we suddenly woke up in a third world country – except with better plumbing.”

The more we change ourselves into a governmental protected class, the less protection we will have. The more we have politicians espousing the abilities of protecting you so you don’t have to. We will resemble a third world nation where protection comes at a price no matter who’s supposedly offering it.

If the government could protect anyone except from a military conflict of some kind. Why wouldn’t they choose to protect their own employees involved in the legal justice system, from violent crime before it could happen to them? It is hard to ask the government to protect us, when we have stories like this one, which demonstrate they usually arrive after the fact.

What country IS this& http://mynw.me/YVCaFC

Ass, Gas, or Grass, nobody rides alternative energy for free!

Ass, Gas, or Grass, nobody rides for free.

Yet Obama and the dim wits of the Democratic Party support this kind of social abuse of the population with their branded social engineering. Wind power or solar power isn’t cheaper or even competitive with the old fashion oil & gas. These fools of modern failure (Mr. Obama and crew) are actively in support of something that is more expensive, inconsistent, and responsible for slowing the growth of the economy. That’s not also saying that it isn’t also a total waste of taxpayer’s money and efforts in earning that money, it hasn’t had an effect on the economy and the creation of new jobs…. thus new taxpayer’s. In short, an alternative energy plan reduces the standards of living for all, including the tax revenues to the government having borrowed the money in the first place, that now has become a great big liability. Nothing but a lose, lose, lose kind of plan to becoming a loser! That’s why BP is getting out of the wind energy business. The easy money made by fleecing the American taxpayer and now it is time to go.

It looks like the oil company BP, known for its slogan “beyond petroleum,” is going back to petroleum and selling off its wind business.

“What a shocker? BP recognizes that investments                         in wind energy are increasingly unwise,” Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an email. “Without huge government subsidies and strict mandates, wind energy cannot survive.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/03/back-to-petroleum-bp-to-get-out-of-the-wind-power-business/#ixzz2PRnto2mw

Safety hostage takers! Presidential thievery! And the sequester.

Presidential thievery through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices of policies within the sequester is coming to you soon! We must be prepared to act as informed voters to these subject matters. Because acting like A.D.D. voters of the low informed kind, is of no good to the defence of the nations liberty’s.

With the negatives to the sequester looming, how will it affect the economy, seems to be the only debate among politicians? No one is interested in making a real effort in discovering how best to avoid the negatives within the sequester, just the magnification of them. Mr. Obama solution to his created problem seems to be, emphasizing the problems and presenting the other political party in the most negative lime light, through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices. Mr. Obama, who would rather choose to party, celebrate, or vacation, then in finding solutions himself. His offerings, presented to the economic Gods of socialism, inflict maximum pain on the population while common sense is being quickly swept under the rug, hoping that no one will noticed.

Under the flag of procrastination our government governs one crisis into many more. In a blink-of-an-eye Mr. Obama is just now realizing that we have to do something. like a kid who is realizing that he has a science project do in days,  and has wasted almost all of his time, finely decides to do something. His reaction; Chooses to blame others for his own procrastination.

A look at the cuts and the chilling impact the administration says they would have on the economy goes like this. Find the most uncomfortable services that the public will most likely complain about and cut them relentlessly….

-Defense: Troops at war would be protected, but there’d be fewer Air Force flying hours, less training for some Army units and cuts in naval forces.

-Health: The National Institutes of Health would lose $1.6 billion, trimming cancer

-Food and agriculture: About 600,000 low-income pregnant women and new mothers would lose food aid and nutrition education

-Homeland Security: Fewer border agents

transportation: Most of the Federal Aviation Administration’s 47,000 employees would face furloughs, including air traffic controllers,

-Environment: Diminished Environmental Protection Agency monitoring of oil spills,

-Labor: More than 3.8 million people jobless for six months or longer could see their unemployment benefits reduced by as much as 9.4 percent.

-Housing: The Department of Housing and Urban Development said about 125,000 poor households could lose benefits from the agency’s Housing Choice Voucher program and risk becoming homeless.

-Not to mention other idle threats made to the citizens of this nation, like Joe Biden who said (paraphrased), “An increase of rape and violent crimes may be on the rise without increased spending on police officers and other public safety services.” As the justification for more uncontrolled, unwise, wasteful spending.

Just a good reason to have control of your God-given rights, and not the government taking them away, like their attempts with the second amendment.

But then we have hostage takers in office, where they would rather take some needed services, placing them in a so to speak head-lock, and placing a gun to those services heads, demand more of the same reckless spending on your children’s credit card issued by the bank of China, or else say good-by to these services!

What kind of politicians uses these kinds of tactics against the people of his or her’s own nation? It isn’t any good long-term policies or of any good for the people. But more bad policies piled up against or upon past bad policies, all the while risking the people’s safety, by the same people, sworn to protect and up hold their safety. In other words, these politicians are threatening the safety because they refuse to do the job of, cutting waste from the government’s budget, in so doing they threaten, instead of protecting the growth of the economy. Cutting the waste out of government or shrinking the size of the same would be limiting to the tax burden on the people, and pro-growth.

There is no differences to our modern-day politicians, and modern-day mugger’s on the streets of Chicago. Everyone knows that mugger’s are breaking the law and acting without human decency, the other uses the power over the people justifying their own actions of theft, through making laws that destroys human dignity, good will, and trust.

Mr. Obama created the sequester, rather than now excepting the blame for a bad policy and idea, as well as acting like an adult person in finding solutions. His actions are that of just implementing political leverage. As the head of the Democratic party, the commander and chief of thug politics, and political thievery, Mr. Obama has shown his true colors of Chicago politics, and corruption of the political proses. Policies like this will only cause the people to make every effort in protecting themselves from the long arm of the government, causing a farther slow-down in the economy at worse, or more of the same at best.

With Obama in office, the people shouldn’t expecting the government to protect the people from the barbarians at the gates, it will be more like….. Pay your toll (higher taxes) for more of the same wasteful spending, or be thrown to the mercies of those barbarians within our gates.

the true war on poverty.

The use & excuse of slavery must end. I’d like a laundry list of Black accomplishments taught in schools all over the country as the true black history of America. Black people need to see how historically they’ve been, a success in America despite parties. I’m not saying “our” history is more important… it’s that Blacks need a newer reference point of American values than what occurred through slavery. Black people need to know that they don’t need government programs in order to succeed. Exactly… we need references where Black people were successful without Government dependency. A real US History explained in a true positive light, that will inspire and rekindle human potential, and the pursuit of excellence, over that of being a new kept people destined for lower wage jobs. We need to rise above that education system that teaches the values of the political race baiters. But so it seems that neither party is really interested in edifying Black people to their contributions includes the NAACP, as worthwhile contributions in making improvements to American society as a whole. So the Democrats and the Republicans must assume equal guilt for the continued human misery and wasted moneys spent on the war on poverty over the past 40 years. We should stop complaining about the wrongs of our ancestors and that of slavery, for those things we can do nothing about. But this generation must stop hiding their guilt with respect to the war on poverty in hopes to hide this generation wrong just long enough so as not to be held accountable for them.

Perpetual Crisis’s of necessity

When the angels of darkness gather together blotting out the bright nature of our future yet to come. What powers of the common citizen can then be deployed in returning sanity to the governing power to be? With every dollar borrowed on the citizens behalf by a corrupt politician, unopposed by that citizen, the citizenry excerpts the chains of debt that bind them to a life of slavery.

Freedom of speech allows us to make an attempt at wakening the sleeping giant of the American people. The question that remains, are we asleep, or have we been poisoned?

It wasn’t all that long ago that Rahm Emanuel said; You never want a serious crisis to go to waste: http://youtu.be/1yeA_kHHLow via @youtube. Governing by allowing the country to go from one crisis to another, allows the forces within government to manipulate power, and, the publics emotions, using emotional terror, in order to manage the crises. There never seem to be any governmental Politian with political back bone enough, to then choosing to use it, while presenting policies of some new bold ideas in avoiding future serious crises. Even the presentations of late of policies or legislation in solving one crisis only seems to lead to a renewed crisis’s of the future. The follies of such policies are never fully recognized, or are they, they are never argued persuasively as why they are follies? If this is the case, shouldn’t we then collectively be questioning our politician’s motives?

The fiscal cliff was one such crisis that was nothing more than one side saying that we need more revenues to help with our out of control budgets. The other side stated that we have a spending problem not a taxing one.

What was solved? We raised taxes on some rich guys which amounts to being able to run the government for some nine days worth in new in revenues. Wow Crisis averted! But what about the spending side of things? Nothing but empty promises for future cuts. The next crisis is already put on the calendar. The government will run out of money in two or three months if we don’t raise the debt limit. Allowing government to barrow even more money. Wasn’t that what the cliff was about in short….. allowing ourselves to borrowing and spending more than we were going to tax people in the first place?

A simple analogy on the governments way to solving problems is….. You have just come home from vacation and discovered a sewage pipe burst and filled your home to the roof with sewage. Solution…. Raise the roof!

Hitting the debt ceiling time and time again. Only demonstrates there is a spending problem. Using the manufactured crisis of a potential debt down grade, we shouldn’t have the attitude, that if we don’t barrow more money and fast the crisis will get bigger. This only magnifies the future uncomfortable condition the nation will have to endure when no one is willing to lend and there is nothing left to tax in order to repay the debt.

Moving from one crisis to another, a self-imposed crisis created wholly by government actions or inaction, is a form of mental and emotional terror of the public. An abusive manipulation of the public’s trust. An incompetent form of leadership whose definitions of success would only lead to rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Over that of making an attempt at avoiding sure disaster….. Or the next crisis.

If our Politian’s of today are only seeking to manage the decay with their political actions? Then they are also admitting by their actions along with a lack of intestinal fortitude, that there is nothing to gain by doing something positive. Only admitting through their actions to everyone, the rot cannot be stopped! A defeatist attitude at best, an attitude of applying a mismanagement within a managed decay, then presenting it to society as a job well done, rather than actively searching to stopping the decay. These modern Politian’s are only offering a slowing of the impending rot to the core doom of our society, while presenting distortions of it as a brighter future yet to be realized.

If these modern politicians, visionaries of doom, disciples of destruction, had to be measured by their worth to society as a governmental official in the same way as they would have to measure themselves in the privet sector, working in a for profit business. The public would see real fast that the government and the career politician, are promoters of failure, instead of being the protectors of innovation and success.

What ever happened to that bright shiny city on the hill kind of presentations by any Politian’s? Truly positive presentations given to all of us as a future to look towards to, is what seem to be missing? Or have we accepted those pale pastel colors of failed ideas as being more comfortable than accepting those vividly bolder colors of new ideas, as well as the efforts needed to realize them?

The problem isn’t within our Politian’s presentations of a brighter future. It is in the understanding of it. For they all a spouse to a futuristic dream of better times, while pointing towards the boogie-man of any present crises, as to what is keeping us from getting there. But then our Politian’s are working only in attaining, and maintaining, their positions of power. A politicians life is a more comfortable life, a life of ease different from that of the average citizen. It is this kind of bright future they have sold themselves to. Having to resort to the use of manipulation through crisis’s to insure their futures will be filled with a brighter shining light on that hilltop were they live. While manipulating the general masses in sell their human potential, and their God-given bright futures, along with their, freedoms, and rights, for some mythical dirty pieces of silver.

If our Politian’s were to make an honest attempt at cleaning house, and providing some bold new ideas for a collective brighter future. They may be in favor of term limits, a balanced budget, paying down the debt, simplifying the tax code, and returning some of the governing powers back to individual states to manage for themselves. (Example; the department of education just to name one). All the while recognizing these types of changes also would have the federal government excepting some short-term pain, as well some diminished powers over the people. But then isn’t this why a crisis is never a good thing to waste? Government is always at war with the people in expanding its powers over the people. Who are the people to trust if their politicians are misrepresenting themselves as being something other than, evilly corrupt, manipulative. Left to their own devices with no term limits they distort government’s job through mental gymnastics of sorts and a clever creation of crisis after crisis and solutions that amount to nothing more than buying some voter blocks, and their votes.

A government that creates a solution to any present crisis, refusing to use critical thinking in finding that more perfect solution, so as not to add to any future crises. Has adopted the policies of crisis as the acid to eroding our constitutional freedoms and rights, in favor of a more perfect manipulative power of tyranny.

The only crisis that deserves swift response is the one of this nation being under attack by outside forces.

Perpetual crisis of necessity is the mother’s milk of maintaining power of corruption through greedy intent delivered by the politician like a venomous snake. Through its bite it applies the policies of “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste” Yet setting the stage for the next. Applying this kind of political solution, the venomous intoxicants only contributes to more of the same in the future while patronizing society from turning away from it. It is the angles of hell that applies the secret temptations of greed all the same to politician, and citizen alike. The politician uses these intoxicants to hide their irresponsible actions, or greedy intent. A crisis only seems to give an unforgivable insult to the oath of office; for it is the love of the crisis that applies this kind of action within the individual’s inspiration to works harder, in allowing tyranny to creep into their seat of political power, for the porpoises of maintaining that power.  Affecting their thoughts secretly at first, then convincing them to action, because they believe these political policies will never affect their lives in the same way. At the same time, they are knowingly selling their country men’s freedoms to the lowest bidder. Favoring corrupt power over preserving the ideas for all to have the same equal pursuit of happiness.

The greedy politician is more vicious, and more corrupt than that of any rich man hiding behind his money. For a rich man knows he cannot take his money with him in the end. So may then turn to use his wealth in helping others. But the politician understands the power of the office is the simplest form of immortality, never having to give back any newly acquired powers of the government represented by the laws passed, that will affect generations.

Reap and run!

Reap and run!

Are you tired of successful people who say one thing and do another? Expecting special treatment from state and local governments, as well the federal government in order to gain favor for their businesses? Favors of special tax treatment, building zone changes, infrastructure, and changes to benefit their business at the expense of others who don’t share in the same governmental treatments or gained advantages? Seemingly because these smaller businesses aren’t as important to the community, or don’t represent as big of a taxing impact to these governments.

Jim Sinegal, Co-Founder and former CEO of COSTCO, said several things in his speech at the DNC (The Democratic National Convention). But then CEO’s and other Democratic business leadership and Politian’s are alike, with the same attitudes of other top notched and very rich business leaders of the republican party who often have a problem with saying what they mean, and mean what they are saying. Actions speak louder than words. MR. Sinegal seems to have this kind of lack of action in following his words. I happen to have met the man, and found him very likeable, straight forward, but like other people seem to use politics to gain an advantage for themselves. Jim Sinegal said at the DNC.

“But at our company, we recognize that job creation requires time and investment and commitment to the long-term. It requires companies that plant and grow, not executives who reap and run. We’re proud that Costco pays the highest wages among our peers, that we provide benefit and health care plans that are second to none, that we’ve grown our business by promoting from within. So we’re not just giving Costco people jobs, we’re empowering them to build careers and support middle-class families.

At Costco, we know a thing or two about what it takes for businesses to succeed, for a company to do well by its shareholders and to do right by its employees at the same time. We don’t want one set of rules for ourselves and another for our employees.”

Mr. Sinegal doesn’t want to set one set of rules for himself or others like him in his position, while having another set of rules for his employees, or so he said. But then his actions lead me to believe otherwise. Much like the two different rules for Obama care as directed differently towards government officials, as opposed to everyone else. The rulers get what they want to have with little to no cost associated to their own pocketbooks and no red tape. But for the peasants of the land they have to pay higher taxes and likely get lesser quality care in the long run with an unbelievable amount of red tape.

Where the rich can buy the best care that their money can buy, limited only by the size of their bank accounts. Even with their ability to invest and profit from those investments, the rich have an advantage that are in fact different over other people’s ability’s to take advantage for themselves the rules of society. The rich have the ear of government!

I’ll explain: Mr. Sinegal and his wife control about 2 million shares of Costco stock. He pushed the Democratic agenda at the DNC for bigger government, a fairer playing field, and higher taxation of the rich implemented by government policies and then these new taxes spent by government. All explained in an emotional manipulative way. Because of the fiscal cliff created by government, and by going off of it, would certainly raise taxes on everyone rich and poor alike. Mr. Sinegal made moves in order to save himself about 4 million in taxes. All because COSTCO will pay a one-time $7.00 per share special dividend to its shareholders before the end of the year 2012. He doesn’t need the money, and he made a case for the ending our society’s two sets of rules — the ones for the rich and the ones for everyone else.

Mr. Sinegal If you conscience bother you so much about the government having more and more taxes to spend. Why don’t you feel the need out of fairness to pay your fair share of tax? Why do you take unfair advantage of word usage and definitions and apply your own definitions to your actions in acting appropriately with what you say? Avoiding paying taxes or taking advantage of IRS rules, or new taxes about to be implemented is hypocritical. After all you said. “We don’t want one set of rules for ourselves and another for our employees.”

Mr. Buffet was once asked on the CNBC TV. Business show. Do you feel guilty for taking advantage of the IRS tax code in reducing your tax burden? Buffet answered. “NO! The tax code is to tell you as well show you the least amount of tax to be paid by anyone. Don’t hate the player, hate the completed tax code.”

Why is it only Democrats feel the need to complicate things to a point of muddying the waters so no one can see what they are really doing under the surface? Taking personal advantage of the tax code while keeping it complicated, lobbying government to raise taxes on the rich as the answer to all problems. Taxes that rich will never pay because they have for the most part unearned income, taxed differently from earned income. This is nothing short of the same thing as peeing in the pool and pointing fingers at someone else as being the one who is peeing in the pool.

Why is it necessary for the democrats to be compelled into pay taxes, all the while they’re looking for the loopholes to avoid them, and pointing to the GOP as being the party of the greedy rich?

Why do we define being GREEDY as wanting to hold onto what you worked so hard for, and not greedy to want to take it from you by force of government to give to those who made less of an effort in getting what they have. Applying the false standard of governments who act like this as defined as being “charitable”, is muddying the waters of verbal definitions.

(Just a side note. Because the word “Charitable” is also a description, of a somewhat religious term that supports positive attitudes towards life by people’s action and interactions with each other. Recognizing all the while governments don’t have money until they have taken it by forced through taxation of the people. To then call the spending of that money as being charitable, is no different from calling a thief a community charitable fund-raiser.)

A state of fairness in life will only be accomplished when all that can be guaranteed is the same, given to all in the same amounts of equality. Equal amounts of time to live, the same income despite different talents, the same intellect and wisdom, and the same health no matter what we do within our lives to destroy it in the first place. None of these things will ever be legislated by government official, or policies, or purchased by a tax and spend abusive governments of thieves. At some point personal responsibility’s must be assumed in excepting having to protect what you have, because life isn’t fair. So the utopia of fairness is just a Democratic fantasy.

In the words of an old rock-n-roll song by Kansas. “No amount of your money will another minute buy…. all your are is dust in the wind” for nothing is fair in life and no amount of government will ever change it.

Those who would like to reap and run are the ones among us, who have the most to gain in the shortest amount of time with the least amount of efforts. Blinded through selfish greed to do whatever it takes to preserve it for themselves while pointing towards others as if they are the greedy people who need to act in a charitable way. It seem that Mr. Sinegal’s only interest is getting others to do the work of charity that is compelled through the long arm of the governments increasing abusive power of taxation. While he preserves for himself a kings style existence, quieting his conscience for his greedy style of reap and run retirement. Mr. Sinegal you should be ashamed of yourself!