Sugar plumbs terrorists, strawberries, and $59 per gallon green jet fuel.

I thought that “the sequester” was going to end the economy as we all know it? When the White House ended the tours, it was just proof positive of that fact. Then there were stories of hungry people, some 700,000 that would not be getting their SNAP benefits. That’s right again, do to the sequester? I suppose record numbers of people on the government dole isn’t something to take notice of until you have a little thing called the “SEQUESTER”?

Despite the sequester, a designed plan brought to everyone by the president and his democratic steeple. The manipulative presentations of the sequester is never a talking point about slowing the rate of spending? But a magnification of impending doom? A presentation of a biblical disaster to all humanity? Because the idea was hatched in the minds of men, and is presented as a disastrous calamity that will negatively affect human life, will it also qualify as a work place disaster or an economical terrorist attack? Lets not go to extremes. The sequester is not a reduction! It is a slowing of the rate of government’s spending growth. Even so, if the sequester was a reduction in government spending, what they are telling us is that they can’t find 3% worth of waste in the budget? Not even to avoid impending doom?

Come on people, look harder! What did the president say…”You in government were sent to Washington to make the difficult choices!”

How long will the people allow these sleeper cells of economical terror to exist in government, who have the intent of setting off avalanches of wasteful fantasies wrapped in one crises to the next, only solved by increasing taxes?

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel recently warned that sequestration would cause “suspension of important activities, curtailed training, and could result in furloughs of civilian personnel” but the spending cuts haven’t killed the green fuels program, as the Pentagon has continued purchasing renewable fuel at $59 per gallon.

Well the sequester didn’t kill the green energy industry? We already had a 90 billion dollar waste on green energy that could have kept the white house tours going indefinitely. Honestly green jet fuels, at a cost of $59 per gallon, is reasonable, and economical? If we could squeeze $58 per gallon jet fuel out of aborted babies would that be a good policy to pursue? Why is $59 per gallon jet fuel reasonable, no matter how it is made? How is that worth a way word thought in the minds of idiots, net alone, have a snowball’s chance in hell getting past the mighty, all-powerful, evil sequester that will starve a nation? That policy produced by evil politician to cause starvation of 700,000 people (presumed to be kids none the less) some how this is a bargain in choosing $59 jet fuel, in weighing out the consequences between the lesser of two evils?

Do you thing the negotiations when like this…we have 700,000 people we could feed, or we can buy this crazy good green energy jet fuel? Because green energy is the future–what will the vote be and who is going to break the bad news to the people of America?

I know it is an over simplification of negotiations devoid of common sense! But some times it takes recklessness in pointing out the retarded mind numb in government!

With all of the injustice caused by the sequester, how did the green energy policies escape the grim reaper of modern economy’s? Please explain to me… when our existence was transformed to the realities of the “Mad Max” movie, to justify the extreme costs of green energy? Because certainly, even in the Mad Max movie–a world that ran out of oil, would have thought of $59 per gallon as too high a price to pay for fuel?

Shouldn’t government be spending money on inventing the “Back to the future Delorean   car”, at least that ran on garbage, and think of it as just as green energy worthy in saving the planet. If you don think so, you need to spend some more time at a land fill. Just saying the Delorean is better then the Mad Max world.

But then using this movie example, look to what kind of life we all have to look forward to in the future, if green energy sponsored by the retarded idiots of government has their way? If this is the cost of green energy today, what will the cost of a ripe red strawberry be in February? Because we know they’re out of growing season and flown in from some distant land on a jet today?

It seems government choices are never in favor of doing something good for 100% of the people 100% of the time? That would require too much common sense, something that was outlawed several sequesters ago.

Despite sequester, DOD signs contract for $59/gallon green jet fuel http://bit.ly/ZC5n9L#.UYPJp9Lu9OI.twitter via @DCExaminer

Too mooch, or not to mooch! (Obama-nomics; chief designer of “Pimp my pantry”)

Wrenching a world apart with failed political policies, leaving people pointing finger at each other calling names, “Well you’re a taker, and I’m a maker.” one side calls out.

The other side responds, “No you’re a greedy rich person, and we are the people in need!”

This is where the people of this once great nation have ended up after Obama-nomics?  Once people came to this nation only wanting an equal opportunity. Now they come hoping for an un-equaled amount of handouts, while taking their time to find some personal footing. Can you blame the people? I blame the politicians! After all we the America people, have come to know this America, through the eyes of the rest of the poor world, now flooding into this nation looking for charity, if not demanding it.

At least through the distorted view of the liberal government official, that also sees the world differently out of their own guilt, paints a picture of national guilt, accusing the nation of not wanting to help people in need as their guilty manipulation. A means to grab even more power for themselves by brow beating people into feeling guilty of their accomplishments, or just being guilty for having been born an American.

What is the point of having lines on paper representing boarders, If the politicians of the day (the gate keepers) selectively choose wether or not to enforce the laws, or even locking the gates?

There used to be a requirement in order to be able to enter the country as a permanent immigrant. Today to use the term “Illegal alien” is cruel, inhuman. The progressives and the proper political correctness have created terms to be used with people who break the law in coming to America. The proper term now is “Illegal immigrant”. To lessen the personal pain of the criminal immigrant for breaking the law, or to cause guilty feelings of the rest of the American people, because of their immigrant heritage? Immigrants of the past used to come here offering skills and looking to exchange those skills for equal free opportunity’s. Today a good portion of immigrants are offering little skill other than a potential democratic vote, for all of the free stuff they can haul away in those hands of opportunity.

I mean, what would you do if you came home from work and found 20 people in your living room and you didn’t know where they came from despite the law of the land? When you complained about the problem, you only discovered that those laws on the books were only selectively enforced. When you complained some more about the added costs you were experiencing, you were deemed as a greedy bastard. The political correct view, of you, Joe Blow Citizen seems to be, a hater of poor people.

Under Obama life isn’t too far from that. Speaking to power and telling them that we are broke, out of money and adding too much debt to the national balance sheet. Just goes un-heard, or worse ignored? They (The powerful in government) respond with. “What? We are the richest nation on earth, because of that  we need to help the poor!”

In fact I have never known a single so-called rich person, or a nation, past or present, that has also given away their riches faster and faster than their incomes, then borrowed even more money and they still some how remained the status of being “Rich”, nor have they no matter how well-intentioned ever reduced the needs of the poor.

Since 1963, the year the policy “The war on poverty” was conceived, American politicians have spent 16 trillion dollars on helping the poor, hoping to reduce poverty in America. Today we have a national debt of the same, with an even larger segment of the population needing help from the government. It is clear, government policies create dependency. This in a nation that celebrates on the 4th of July–“Independence”! Go figure.

What is more upsetting then poor people’s needs, legal or illegal, is the politicization of misconstrued facts. I’m trying to be nicer and kinder these days so I used “Misconstrued” instead of “flat-out liars about the facts”! Mr. Obama closed down the White house tours, and blamed the sequester, then followed up with delay’s of air traffic. Making sure that comfortable delays would be realized by the traveler as a gift of the furloughed air traffic controllers in major cities. Totally leaving the Washington DC air traffic unhampered, unaffected, controllers un-furloughed. who’d a thought? It shows that this president is willing to hurt the American people and the economy, for political points, for the sake of winning unreasonable, unpopular, manipulated political arguments.

After all it is only the rich who travel, and they can afford some pain to help the poor, right?

With all of this going around the various news agencies, where is the news on the “Food stamp recruiters” trying to give away the last bit of money left in the treasury before the American people truly realize that government is truly the enemy of the people and any of the people’s wealth? Yes that’s right, food stamp recruiters trying to get people to sign up for what is termed— as their benefits that their entitled to. So these stamp recruiters have been seen around the golf courses in Florida recruiting retired people. Honestly people who play golf don’t need food stamps!  With the sequester in place, where are these programs getting their money from, not only for the food give aways but also to pay the recruiters, when we supposedly can’t even pay air traffic controllers?

Yep! You get the picture all right. Mr. Obama couldn’t manage himself out of a wet paper bag, facts are, in truth he is the mismanage-er-in-chief. He and he alone is the chief designer of “Pimp my pantry” with all of the free food giveaway’s. Why are these well-intentioned programs also being abused by people? Why can they use their benefits at their local strip clubs/bars, casinos, or even selling their stamps on-line so they could use the money on who knows what? Why is it a cruel abuse, to denied a poor person the ability’s of seeing a nude women, when that money should have bought food and diapers for their kids? Why can they do this without prosecutions? Call it, the Obama bucks give away! Much like the Obama phones of yesterday. Now who’s guilty of being “Greedy”?

But the richest nation on earth isn’t out of money, until the redistribution of the term “rich” is complete? Of course there will still be rich people here in the good old USA, in fact more than the rest of the world? It is just re-applying the term rich to people who will have a lot less wealth after Obama is through. So what happens to the poor people of the world? Will the term “Poor” be massaged into a new term less demeaning? Will poor people go the way of the dinosaur? Will poor people still be making their demands of the socialists of the world until wealth is totally destroyed, and misery is the new equally?

It seems when the value of money is destroyed, political clout, such as food stamps, will become the new unit of exchange to be used?

When the American people realize that they can vote into office people that will benefit themselves without having to make a reasonable effort for themselves; that is when the spark of freedom will have been extinguished, and mob rule will replace rule of law.

“The fastest way to destroy your enemy in a modern world, with less cost then fighting a war, is controlling the food supply! Every nation will fall when the people demand more food then supply’s exist.” paraphrased from a speech that Henry Kissinger gave at the end of the Vietnam war. The same applies to when a government gives food away; who’s going to receive that benefits and then vote to end that policy? Do these people realize that they are selling their freedoms of tomorrow?

Moocher Nation: Paid Food Stamp Recruiters – 620 WTMJ … http://www.620wtmj.com/blogs/charliesykes/204649971

Florida, other states, hires recruiters to sign up food stamps – UPI.com http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2013/04/25/Florida-other-states-hire-recruiters-to-sign-up-food-stamps/UPI-30891366869297/

Fla. bill would ban using food stamps for stripper, casino tabs … http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/03/16/fla-bill-would-ban-using-food-stamps-for-stripper-casino-tabs-55875

Safety hostage takers! Presidential thievery! And the sequester.

Presidential thievery through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices of policies within the sequester is coming to you soon! We must be prepared to act as informed voters to these subject matters. Because acting like A.D.D. voters of the low informed kind, is of no good to the defence of the nations liberty’s.

With the negatives to the sequester looming, how will it affect the economy, seems to be the only debate among politicians? No one is interested in making a real effort in discovering how best to avoid the negatives within the sequester, just the magnification of them. Mr. Obama solution to his created problem seems to be, emphasizing the problems and presenting the other political party in the most negative lime light, through the use of red meat rhetoric as the weapon of choice and practices. Mr. Obama, who would rather choose to party, celebrate, or vacation, then in finding solutions himself. His offerings, presented to the economic Gods of socialism, inflict maximum pain on the population while common sense is being quickly swept under the rug, hoping that no one will noticed.

Under the flag of procrastination our government governs one crisis into many more. In a blink-of-an-eye Mr. Obama is just now realizing that we have to do something. like a kid who is realizing that he has a science project do in days,  and has wasted almost all of his time, finely decides to do something. His reaction; Chooses to blame others for his own procrastination.

A look at the cuts and the chilling impact the administration says they would have on the economy goes like this. Find the most uncomfortable services that the public will most likely complain about and cut them relentlessly….

-Defense: Troops at war would be protected, but there’d be fewer Air Force flying hours, less training for some Army units and cuts in naval forces.

-Health: The National Institutes of Health would lose $1.6 billion, trimming cancer

-Food and agriculture: About 600,000 low-income pregnant women and new mothers would lose food aid and nutrition education

-Homeland Security: Fewer border agents

transportation: Most of the Federal Aviation Administration’s 47,000 employees would face furloughs, including air traffic controllers,

-Environment: Diminished Environmental Protection Agency monitoring of oil spills,

-Labor: More than 3.8 million people jobless for six months or longer could see their unemployment benefits reduced by as much as 9.4 percent.

-Housing: The Department of Housing and Urban Development said about 125,000 poor households could lose benefits from the agency’s Housing Choice Voucher program and risk becoming homeless.

-Not to mention other idle threats made to the citizens of this nation, like Joe Biden who said (paraphrased), “An increase of rape and violent crimes may be on the rise without increased spending on police officers and other public safety services.” As the justification for more uncontrolled, unwise, wasteful spending.

Just a good reason to have control of your God-given rights, and not the government taking them away, like their attempts with the second amendment.

But then we have hostage takers in office, where they would rather take some needed services, placing them in a so to speak head-lock, and placing a gun to those services heads, demand more of the same reckless spending on your children’s credit card issued by the bank of China, or else say good-by to these services!

What kind of politicians uses these kinds of tactics against the people of his or her’s own nation? It isn’t any good long-term policies or of any good for the people. But more bad policies piled up against or upon past bad policies, all the while risking the people’s safety, by the same people, sworn to protect and up hold their safety. In other words, these politicians are threatening the safety because they refuse to do the job of, cutting waste from the government’s budget, in so doing they threaten, instead of protecting the growth of the economy. Cutting the waste out of government or shrinking the size of the same would be limiting to the tax burden on the people, and pro-growth.

There is no differences to our modern-day politicians, and modern-day mugger’s on the streets of Chicago. Everyone knows that mugger’s are breaking the law and acting without human decency, the other uses the power over the people justifying their own actions of theft, through making laws that destroys human dignity, good will, and trust.

Mr. Obama created the sequester, rather than now excepting the blame for a bad policy and idea, as well as acting like an adult person in finding solutions. His actions are that of just implementing political leverage. As the head of the Democratic party, the commander and chief of thug politics, and political thievery, Mr. Obama has shown his true colors of Chicago politics, and corruption of the political proses. Policies like this will only cause the people to make every effort in protecting themselves from the long arm of the government, causing a farther slow-down in the economy at worse, or more of the same at best.

With Obama in office, the people shouldn’t expecting the government to protect the people from the barbarians at the gates, it will be more like….. Pay your toll (higher taxes) for more of the same wasteful spending, or be thrown to the mercies of those barbarians within our gates.

Greener lawns, re-adjusting the greed factor.

When is a decision made for what is in your, or your family best interest, then is publicly perceived as being greedy? Don’t we all make decisions in life with our personal best interest in mind? Where are the best price for bread, clothes, our homes and schools for our kids, what represents the best values in entertainments or even vacations? All of these decisions and others made in order to stretch the all mighty dollar in our budgets. After all, we aren’t all fat cats, millionaires or even billionaires who make some $250,000.00 per year, as defined by the government. So stretching the dollar is a must if we are to save, and invest our way into that group.

But when we become wealthy, or plain God gifted by some….. I don’t know… Talent to play a sport, and receive unreal amounts of payola, should we be looking to stretch the mighty dollar? Or should society force you into a passion by pier-pressure, to spend the money you have or make without ever deciding where the value is for yourself?

Fed up with the spike in federal and state tax hikes, Phil Mickelson hinted at “drastic changes” that would possibly involve moving his family out of his native California or toward some form of semi-retirement.

Phil Mickelson, according to Sports Illustrated, makes over $60M in 2012 and is  the country’s second highest-paid athlete.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more-sports/phil-rants-recants-tax-raise-article-1.1244850#ixzz2IouvShYu

It is because of California’s progressive stance on taxing and spending uncontrolled that is. That’s why they are looking at this statement by Phil Mickelson, which is considered to be a very rich resident, or at least greedy. How dare he look to save money by not paying his fair share? Isn’t he just looking to personally take from the Californian community and economy all for himself?

Later in the week Phil Mickelson said.

“I’m not going to jump the gun, but there are going to be some (changes),” he said Sunday. “There are going to be some drastic changes for me because I happen to be in that zone that has been targeted both federally and by the state and . . . it doesn’t work for me right now.”

Isn’t that what it is all about? Government sets some rules and regulations on how to play this game of life within a social community. All the while leaving you with personal choices on the how’s, and where’s, you decide to live, or what degree your life style will be. Phil recognizes the changes in the political atmosphere, and the tax revenues required to run this attitude by governments both state and federal. He has become a target just because of his unusual high income based on his talent to play golf, and his attitude of trying to save money by not wanting to pay so high taxes. So why shouldn’t he be able to save himself some money, by deciding what product to use or buy?

Moving from state to state is just that! Indeed, a decision of style of government and the way states govern compared state to state, and what fits best for Phil, or every citizen for that matter. In the field of competition that Phil is well aware, because he competes professionally in golf.  He knows that the best products, or atmosphere, should receive the business, or the title of being the best, the champion. So why is making a statement that the tax environment isn’t working anymore for his family, a greedy stance requiring an apology? Isn’t it more an observation of what states have done to their market place, and done so with somewhat an irresponsible governance of state resources?

Phil’s apology as offered was like this….

On Monday, telling FoxNews in a statement, “Finances and taxes are a personal matter and I should not have made my opinions on them public.”

“I certainly don’t have a definitive plan at this time, but like everyone else I want to make decisions that are best for my future and my family,” Mickelson added.

Why would Phil feel, he had to offer an apology? Isn’t his words exactly what everyone is doing for themselves, trying to figure out the least amount of taxes needed to be paid. How is that not doing what is best for everyone? Did he receive some kind of threats from the state government putting him on the targeted list of making your life a miserable hell if you speak ill of the state’s situation? Or was this just a ploy by Phil to remove attention from his personal decisions, while preserving his future income from endorsements, even should he leave at some point. Either way, it seem that Phil found it necessary to offer an apology to remove a target and the public negative image of his statement that could also lead to some financial impact to his family.

But really, have we just become a society where speaking the truth needs to be apologized for?

Perhaps that’s why other high-profile mega rich people tend to give huge amounts of money to charity in a publicly announced way. Purchasing the best public insurance against negative public opinion’s, over how they chose to live life, or over what they choose to do in life for themselves. Because every decision by the rich, is considered extravagant, and therefore greedy.

So why isn’t trying to stretch your money in no different of ways, the same actions of the average citizen just as greedy? Could it be in the sure numbers of perceived income compared to your own? Is this the new definition of greed applied through changing standards? Is the public just becoming upset with the rich because of the ability of more choices in life do to their wealth? Or is it that rich people have more of everything and therefore need to share with the average person’s in order to lift all standards, or suffer being targeted as the “GREEDY RICH”!

It seem the greed exists, in looking over the fence and seeing that your neighbor has a greener lawn, and then demanding of him to apply fertilizer to your lawn….. Just because!

Greed has also changes the standards of being rich as well. Society considers being rich today, isn’t your fathers rich of being a millionaire any more, but simply having more money than I do, frequently adjusted downward in the name of being fairly compared, and maintaining “Greener lawns, and re-adjusting the greed factor“.

Image was provided by; Andrew Redington/Getty Images, and the following web page.

Information & photo provided by this web page, to read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more-sports/phil-rants-recants-tax-raise-article-1.1244850#ixzz2IoaVtwjq

Debt limits slavery. A Hope for a change.

Friends, politically independent, or Republican’s a like, we are faced with even bigger problems politically speaking then arguing with our political opposition, over policies, and the preserved impact on society.

How can we wake-up our fellow country-men from the very things that threaten our country independence? Like uncontrolled spending, unlimited debt, unwilling attitudes to overhauling the tax code, overlooking the need to remodel our social net, and no new bold policies that will promote growth without also adding to the cost of overhead within the economy. Just to name a few. All of which threaten future job creation and economical growth.

Sadly. We can shout from our soap-boxes on every street corner, on a daily basis, and will we ever get through to people? Until the average American receives pain personally within their lives, they will continue to close their eyes and just vote, hopefully continuing to receiving some crumbs from the political table. Our government-run by the opposition party (the Democrats) will abuse this mind-set to its full extent, to satisfy their lust for total power, while also destroying the GOP at the same time.

As long as our neighbors continue to see the sun rise, and their groceries stores…. with full shelves of every kind of products, gas-stations… with gas at some reasonable price on every corner, and the common belief that government will save them if they lose their jobs or choose not to work at all. They will never entertain the need to change for what they have come to see and believe as nothing but working for them?

Unfortunately America has become fat, dumb, and spoiled, as well undisciplined crybabies!

America does have addictions, and those who are mostly addicted to an extravagant life style of debt will continue to believe that they are writing the script of how life will be for them in the future. Refusing to see the need to save, and control what they have saved, all to be able to retire comfortably or to buy materialistic things at some point free from the fear of the repo-man. They just continue putting it all on credit. Their foolish foolishness has sown the seeds of false impressions, believing that they are wealthy. But they are NOT!

Democrats often refer to America as the wealthiest nation on earth, promoting the policies that only will continue to barrow money without end. Giving the impression that we can barrow endlessly. But this is nothing short of being unrealistic, using words as an addict would as they play mental gymnastics on themselves justifying irresponsible actions, having yet accepted that there are any problems.

So when will this country have to withstand the perils of insolvency, riddled with debt, paralyzed with political stupidity, and everyday life becoming an unrecognizable pain to endure? If not in our lifetimes, in our children’s then? When will we see a need to change present course of actions?

Perhaps when insolvency creates the first bit of unrecognizable pain in our lives, there will be a ground swell of public outcry, telling our politicians….. “STOP SELLING OUR SOVEREIGNTY TOO FOREIGN BANKS, ON OUR WAY DOWN THAT SLIPPERY SLOPE TOWARDS LIBERTY’S PERIL?”

When will we all be united with crystal clear knowledge, lessons learned from our own stupidly mistakes or the graduates course  from the college of hard knocks; “That the borrower is SLAVE to the lender?”

Perpetual Crisis’s of necessity

When the angels of darkness gather together blotting out the bright nature of our future yet to come. What powers of the common citizen can then be deployed in returning sanity to the governing power to be? With every dollar borrowed on the citizens behalf by a corrupt politician, unopposed by that citizen, the citizenry excerpts the chains of debt that bind them to a life of slavery.

Freedom of speech allows us to make an attempt at wakening the sleeping giant of the American people. The question that remains, are we asleep, or have we been poisoned?

It wasn’t all that long ago that Rahm Emanuel said; You never want a serious crisis to go to waste: http://youtu.be/1yeA_kHHLow via @youtube. Governing by allowing the country to go from one crisis to another, allows the forces within government to manipulate power, and, the publics emotions, using emotional terror, in order to manage the crises. There never seem to be any governmental Politian with political back bone enough, to then choosing to use it, while presenting policies of some new bold ideas in avoiding future serious crises. Even the presentations of late of policies or legislation in solving one crisis only seems to lead to a renewed crisis’s of the future. The follies of such policies are never fully recognized, or are they, they are never argued persuasively as why they are follies? If this is the case, shouldn’t we then collectively be questioning our politician’s motives?

The fiscal cliff was one such crisis that was nothing more than one side saying that we need more revenues to help with our out of control budgets. The other side stated that we have a spending problem not a taxing one.

What was solved? We raised taxes on some rich guys which amounts to being able to run the government for some nine days worth in new in revenues. Wow Crisis averted! But what about the spending side of things? Nothing but empty promises for future cuts. The next crisis is already put on the calendar. The government will run out of money in two or three months if we don’t raise the debt limit. Allowing government to barrow even more money. Wasn’t that what the cliff was about in short….. allowing ourselves to borrowing and spending more than we were going to tax people in the first place?

A simple analogy on the governments way to solving problems is….. You have just come home from vacation and discovered a sewage pipe burst and filled your home to the roof with sewage. Solution…. Raise the roof!

Hitting the debt ceiling time and time again. Only demonstrates there is a spending problem. Using the manufactured crisis of a potential debt down grade, we shouldn’t have the attitude, that if we don’t barrow more money and fast the crisis will get bigger. This only magnifies the future uncomfortable condition the nation will have to endure when no one is willing to lend and there is nothing left to tax in order to repay the debt.

Moving from one crisis to another, a self-imposed crisis created wholly by government actions or inaction, is a form of mental and emotional terror of the public. An abusive manipulation of the public’s trust. An incompetent form of leadership whose definitions of success would only lead to rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Over that of making an attempt at avoiding sure disaster….. Or the next crisis.

If our Politian’s of today are only seeking to manage the decay with their political actions? Then they are also admitting by their actions along with a lack of intestinal fortitude, that there is nothing to gain by doing something positive. Only admitting through their actions to everyone, the rot cannot be stopped! A defeatist attitude at best, an attitude of applying a mismanagement within a managed decay, then presenting it to society as a job well done, rather than actively searching to stopping the decay. These modern Politian’s are only offering a slowing of the impending rot to the core doom of our society, while presenting distortions of it as a brighter future yet to be realized.

If these modern politicians, visionaries of doom, disciples of destruction, had to be measured by their worth to society as a governmental official in the same way as they would have to measure themselves in the privet sector, working in a for profit business. The public would see real fast that the government and the career politician, are promoters of failure, instead of being the protectors of innovation and success.

What ever happened to that bright shiny city on the hill kind of presentations by any Politian’s? Truly positive presentations given to all of us as a future to look towards to, is what seem to be missing? Or have we accepted those pale pastel colors of failed ideas as being more comfortable than accepting those vividly bolder colors of new ideas, as well as the efforts needed to realize them?

The problem isn’t within our Politian’s presentations of a brighter future. It is in the understanding of it. For they all a spouse to a futuristic dream of better times, while pointing towards the boogie-man of any present crises, as to what is keeping us from getting there. But then our Politian’s are working only in attaining, and maintaining, their positions of power. A politicians life is a more comfortable life, a life of ease different from that of the average citizen. It is this kind of bright future they have sold themselves to. Having to resort to the use of manipulation through crisis’s to insure their futures will be filled with a brighter shining light on that hilltop were they live. While manipulating the general masses in sell their human potential, and their God-given bright futures, along with their, freedoms, and rights, for some mythical dirty pieces of silver.

If our Politian’s were to make an honest attempt at cleaning house, and providing some bold new ideas for a collective brighter future. They may be in favor of term limits, a balanced budget, paying down the debt, simplifying the tax code, and returning some of the governing powers back to individual states to manage for themselves. (Example; the department of education just to name one). All the while recognizing these types of changes also would have the federal government excepting some short-term pain, as well some diminished powers over the people. But then isn’t this why a crisis is never a good thing to waste? Government is always at war with the people in expanding its powers over the people. Who are the people to trust if their politicians are misrepresenting themselves as being something other than, evilly corrupt, manipulative. Left to their own devices with no term limits they distort government’s job through mental gymnastics of sorts and a clever creation of crisis after crisis and solutions that amount to nothing more than buying some voter blocks, and their votes.

A government that creates a solution to any present crisis, refusing to use critical thinking in finding that more perfect solution, so as not to add to any future crises. Has adopted the policies of crisis as the acid to eroding our constitutional freedoms and rights, in favor of a more perfect manipulative power of tyranny.

The only crisis that deserves swift response is the one of this nation being under attack by outside forces.

Perpetual crisis of necessity is the mother’s milk of maintaining power of corruption through greedy intent delivered by the politician like a venomous snake. Through its bite it applies the policies of “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste” Yet setting the stage for the next. Applying this kind of political solution, the venomous intoxicants only contributes to more of the same in the future while patronizing society from turning away from it. It is the angles of hell that applies the secret temptations of greed all the same to politician, and citizen alike. The politician uses these intoxicants to hide their irresponsible actions, or greedy intent. A crisis only seems to give an unforgivable insult to the oath of office; for it is the love of the crisis that applies this kind of action within the individual’s inspiration to works harder, in allowing tyranny to creep into their seat of political power, for the porpoises of maintaining that power.  Affecting their thoughts secretly at first, then convincing them to action, because they believe these political policies will never affect their lives in the same way. At the same time, they are knowingly selling their country men’s freedoms to the lowest bidder. Favoring corrupt power over preserving the ideas for all to have the same equal pursuit of happiness.

The greedy politician is more vicious, and more corrupt than that of any rich man hiding behind his money. For a rich man knows he cannot take his money with him in the end. So may then turn to use his wealth in helping others. But the politician understands the power of the office is the simplest form of immortality, never having to give back any newly acquired powers of the government represented by the laws passed, that will affect generations.

Supporting the upwardly mobile poverty line

Supporting the upwardly mobile poverty line

According to the government, “the Senate Budget Committee ” recently reported its own assessments, which totaled up the true cost of supporting welfare recipients, along with projections of the 2013 costs of them….

It’s official. Taxpayers are no longer simply helping the poor; they’re subsidizing the lives of welfare recipients at a better rate than their own. The Senate Budget Committee has released a report showing households living below the poverty line and receiving welfare payments are raking in the equivalent of $168 per day in benefits which come in the form of food stamps, housing, childcare, healthcare and more. The median household income in 2011 was $50,054, totaling $137.13 per day. The worst part? Welfare payments are equivalent to making $30 per hour for 40 hours a week. The median wage for non-welfare recipients is $25 per hour but because they pay taxes, unlike welfare recipients, the wage is bumped down to $21 per hour. From the report:

For fiscal year 2011, CRS identified roughly 80 overlapping federal means-tested welfare programs that together represented the single largest budget item in 2011—more than the nation spends on Social Security, Medicare, or national defense. The total amount spent on these federal programs, when taken together with approximately $280 billion in state contributions, amounted to roughly $1 trillion. Nearly 95 percent of these costs come from four categories of spending: medical assistance, cash assistance, food assistance, and social / housing assistance. Under the President’s FY13 budget proposal, means-tested spending would increase an additional 30 percent over the next four years.

( governments own report pictured as reported)  http://wp.me/a2DfMt-qi

If people are going to look to government for their answers to every problem they face in life. The uncertain problems as well as the self-created problems. Why can’t government then also find answers to lift all people up with positive solutions and policies to their problems, in an effort to build a positive society over that of just slowly eroding society away?

So often the media points out that people need training to have a chance at a better paying jobs to support their families.  So with any welfare program why can’t these people who need a helping hand, also get the true help they need to become a more productive part of society? Giving them some new training in doing government maintenance jobs of buildings, grounds, and parks, building low-income housing….. ect, where at this time the welfare program provides no hands on training other than offering some limited schooling! The program itself promotes a life of getting help, without making much an effort on ones own. The welfare program promotes ready-made guilt through the common belief of entitlement in asking for help, without also providing or offering to do something in exchange for help received.

We have become an entitlement society where by we are entitled to get help without ever having to take any responsibilities for our own actions. There are plenty of jobs that “We the people” could do with government help and money’s spend on national, state, and local levels. Why can’t welfare recipients get those jobs in exchange for the support they are getting? By getting the chance to do those jobs they will also get hands on training to a skill, to then market these skills into the economy, with time, be able then support themselves on their own.

We also could have programs in place to have people take jobs at any wage (like Minim wage), the government then to provide any differences between the wage received by work, and that of what the welfare program provides to them currently.  A savings to the tax payers and a helping hand to people who need it in a way that empowers them to  believe in themselves, while inspiring a can-do attitude, and a up-lifting experience to they’re true potential as a contributing part in society.

Today we only want a pain-free way to house people through government charity. Reserving the right to complained about the charitable work of the government as inefficient, ineffective, socially insulting, personality eroding, supporting a life of irresponsibility’s rewarded. All the while convincing ourselves that government is the best answer, most effective way to administer the work of society’s feel good charity’s, through emotional taxation of its citizenry.

In trying to avoid the total wasted human efforts in society, by wasting human working hours. Government could give a bigger role to those who also work in the economy, who are trying to provide a living for their families. By encouraging them through a tax deduction for contributing to charity, and supporting in a positive way their fellow-man, a positive government policy in finding solutions while preserving liberty and freedoms of choice.

On the other hand, a forced taxation collected in an inefficient government program of redistribution, rewarding irresponsible choices along the way. Is nothing but escalating the costs of society’s managed decay, farther reducing any response to any future emergency that may also arise unexpected.

It seem today the populations view of just what is an emergency, and therefore what government needs to do for them is asking the question—– “Where is my Obama phone?”

What ever happened to; “Ask not what your country can do for you. But ask what you  can do for your country?” JFK

It seems that government is taking the easy way out of doing a supportive job of supporting society positively. It is much easier to buy the upwardly mobile poverty lines vote, to remain in power by engineering the social decay!

UPDATE: The report does not say that every household receiving welfare benefits totals $168 but specifically refers to those receiving benefits and living below the poverty line. Also, it should be pointed out the $168 includes all costs incurred by the federal government to deliver benefits, including administrative costs.

Information provided by; The Senate Budget Committee own released report on this subject.