Is Obama the criminal and chief or just the president that has let his people ( campaign workers ) too much room to operate? The mysterious case of Robert Roche, an Obama bundler, who, for some time, owned the website Obama.com. That site redirects its traffic, 68 percent of which comes from foreign sources, to the official Obama campaign website.
Roche is an American now based in Shanghai, China. His infomercial production company, Acorn International, is the largest TV direct sales operator in China and is closely tied to the Chinese government.
Our business depends on our access to TV media time to market our products and services in China….PRC law is vague and is subject to discretionary interpretation and enforcement by PRC authorities…Loss of these preferential tax treatments and subsidies could have material and adverse effects on our results of operations and financial conditions.
What makes this suspect. Is the campaign laws and how Robert Roche fits in to this story as a pieces of the puzzle. Abuse of the law? Or just finding a previously unknown avenue to take advantage of the high-tech world we live in now days?
According to the law. No foreign citizen may contribute to any campaign. In defining who is considered to be foreign national or citizen. The law is quite clear. ” If an American lives or resides overseas. It is assumed that he / she is a foreign national, untill they prove other wise. The burden of proof is on the person in question.
Mr. Roche and his website which redirects traffic towards the presidents site. Where contributions are solicited and taken. Makes the money contributed to the reelection, suspect to at least questioning. What if the law is being circumvented for a monetary advantage, and used for the purposes to gain reelection? This weakens the process. empowered foreign adversaries, and makes it possible to buy an election with deep pockets of cash. Can an America election be purchase? Is that the kind of picture we would want to project to our enemy’s, by projecting just these kind of view across the globe?
By October 2, 2008, Obama.com began redirecting all visitors to specific content on my.barackobama.com. Upon arrival to my.barackobama.com, visitors were asked for their name, email, and zip code and presumably were sent solicitation letters, like every other visitor who provides that information to the campaign.
Following President Obama’s campaign victory in November 2008, Obama.com redirected visitors to a page selling inauguration merchandise and taking donations for the inauguration celebration. Throughout 2009, the website redirected to pages on the campaign website advocating various presidential initiatives. Starting in late January 2010, Obama.com redirected to a page gathering email addresses and continued to do so through 2011. Sometime during 2012, the webpage began sending visitors to a donation page on the Obama campaign’s website.
People who are openly working for the purposes to get citizens of the world to contribute to an American presidential election. Are indeed acting out in a fraudulent way, and should then be dealt with! To preserve the integrity of our election process. Closing down outside influences from our elections should be job one for every elected government official. Making darn sure that only Americans, and only legal Americans have their voices heard as to what kind of government they will have representing them. Not the interests of foreign money given by individuals, company’s, or even governments! Our representatives job one happens to be…. ” Serve and protect America from all foreign and domestic enemy’s.” No excuses!!
If Obama had some integrity, and deep respect of the office of the presidency. Upon learning about this, he could have taken steps to eliminate the problem. But we’re all still waiting for what seem all to familiar of a response from the president or his people doing his biding.
In an explosive report set to send shockwaves through official Washington, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) released a 108-page GAI investigation into the threat of foreign and fraudulent Internet campaign donations in U.S. federal elections (visit campaignfundingrisks.com to download the full report).
White House Visitor Logs list the name Robert Roche at least 19 times, despite the fact Mr. Roche’s primary residence is in China. Should we have some concerns with the potential of a mole or spy so close to the White House, or potential buddy, buddy relationships of the president and the inner circles in the government?
Truth is Mr Roche has a somewhat close relationship with Obama, and his cabinet. Mr. Roche, who is originally from Chicago, is a co-chair of the Technology Initiative for the Obama campaign.
This kind of information by its self, tells a story that there is at least a small chance to make an attempt by the party’s involved, with a working knowledge, of the all to familiar facts. That money runs DC! This opens the door for politics as usual, the Chicago way, rotten to the core corruption!
At any rate President Obama could have, and still yet has the chance, to correct the problem. Making up grades to modernize their website with the latest security systems. Along with making sure of where the money is coming from. Insisting on the use of present day technology’s to be placed in play. Shouldn’t we modernize the election process in the country? Maybe even posting any and all contributions, and the contributors who gave to the campaign just for clarity. BUT, up till now we hear crickets.
In addition to the Obama.com redirect revelation, the Government Accountability Institute report—America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign And Fraudulent Online Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections?—exposes myriad gaping online security holes that stand to threaten the integrity of House, Senate, and presidential elections.
Government has to modernize and eliminate any and all threats to the integrity of the VOTE, and the process that runs FREEDOM!
With all the known facts. Doesn’t the government then have a responsibility to protect the American election process, seem to be the repeating question? Displaying a renewed integrity for itself, a moral value of honoring the oath of office? They can start with calling for a congressional investigation into this. Maybe even presenting a prison sentences if found guilty of foreign solicitation for campaign funds, and anyone involved with it. Just because! There is no ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT YET!